Re: Re:
Koronin said:
Simurgh said:
Koronin said:
He wasted the efforts of his team today is the only thing I saw.
I don't know - he did well considering the question marks regarding his form and that steep walls like the end aren't his strong suit. The Landa attack was as much tactics as it was him getting an opportunity. Valverde in domestique duty, he would perhaps do better if not, but since the stage win was all but sure to be decided by the breakaway, a top 10 placing doesn't matter for Valverde. Whatever energy expended today by Movistar, it won't affect them in the rest of the Tour, I'm sure.
In my opinion, we again saw terrible tactics by Movistar and again saw Quintana unable to do anything with what was set up. The only thing they did was show that Ineos isn't invulnerable this year with their train. However, I also think that means we're going to see at lot more breaks win stages. As for Valverde, he looks like he doesn't really want to be there.
Yesterday's tactics can be questioned, but I think that it also depends on what their objective was. If it was expose the fragility of the train, I think it partly worked. It isn't as strong as the SKY-trains of previous years. Now I have read, that Nairo said that today's goal was not to lose time, and so I do understand the dissatisfaction. Why then take the lead and put on pressure on the peloton, especially in a climb that doesn't really suit him? If it was to put out a statement, that they won't repeat last years failure and that they will actually risk podium placings and the team classification for a chance for victory, I think it had an impact.
Either way I strongly disagree with the notion, that the energy expended today by Movistar will be paid dearly later in the race - there are 2 flat stages and 2 hilly stages (which will with great probability be contested by the breakaway) before the rest day on Tuesday, and the first mountain stage is on Thursday. I dare say, that they will be fine!