The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
We never know if Froomey is good or bad, a Quintana fan like me can expect a hammering ride from him Friday or Sunday. IMO Froome can be better than Quintana in the Pyrenees, it's even my 1st bet.sir fly said:He's serious as a heart attack about this Tour.
Looked better than Froome today.
Wait, what? He gave it a go over the top, kept pushing on a flatish run-in, and -gasp- saved his legs in a reduced bunch kick. I think ripping the legs off every single rider but your leader in a medium mountain route, one stage away from the Pyrenees would've been a huge mistake, but YMMV, obviously.roundabout said:looked quite telling that the team was unwilling to use Valverde beyond the basic minimum despite all the declarations that he is racing in support
carton said:Wait, what? He gave it a go over the top, kept pushing on a flatish run-in, and -gasp- saved his legs in a reduced bunch kick. I think ripping the legs off every single rider but your leader in a medium mountain route, one stage away from the Pyrenees would've been a huge mistake, but YMMV, obviously.roundabout said:looked quite telling that the team was unwilling to use Valverde beyond the basic minimum despite all the declarations that he is racing in support
I think they just wanted to give both Froome and Quintana a workout. Nairo may or may not be better than Froome after a long slog, but Froome is the best int the world if you give him an easy run-in.roundabout said:If they had a plan to make the stage hard (which they looked like doing on the Peyrol) they should have followed it through.
As it was, they didn't really drop any important GC rider.
roundabout said:That's true.
Where we disagree is that you think that the team doesn't want to use Valverde any more than necessary while I think that he is still keeping an eye on his own GC.
PremierAndrew said:Looking at the tours in the last 5 years, the overall winner has had a perfect first week. Wiggins 2012, Froome 2013, Nibali 2014, Froome 2015, all have a great first week in common. And now, Quintana has had a near perfect first week too. One of the main contenders is really struggling and the other would, if anything, have expected to gain time on Quintana in the first week.
PremierAndrew said:Looking at the tours in the last 5 years, the overall winner has had a perfect first week. Wiggins 2012, Froome 2013, Nibali 2014, Froome 2015, all have a great first week in common. And now, Quintana has had a near perfect first week too. One of the main contenders is really struggling and the other would, if anything, have expected to gain time on Quintana in the first week.
hrotha said:Contenders who have lost time in the first week:
Contador (crashes)
Porte (puncture) (if a contender at all)
Pinot (puncheur finish, not really any sort of typical "first-week business")
I don't think Quintana's first week is an indication of anything. Unlike last year, there's hardly been any opportunity to lose time on terrain where he was at a disadvantage.
Why would you expect Froome to gain time in the first week? Froome has said all along he is peaking later in the race.PremierAndrew said:Looking at the tours in the last 5 years, the overall winner has had a perfect first week. Wiggins 2012, Froome 2013, Nibali 2014, Froome 2015, all have a great first week in common. And now, Quintana has had a near perfect first week too. One of the main contenders is really struggling and the other would, if anything, have expected to gain time on Quintana in the first week.
rick james said:Why would you expect Froome to gain time in the first week? Froome has said all along he is peaking later in the race.PremierAndrew said:Looking at the tours in the last 5 years, the overall winner has had a perfect first week. Wiggins 2012, Froome 2013, Nibali 2014, Froome 2015, all have a great first week in common. And now, Quintana has had a near perfect first week too. One of the main contenders is really struggling and the other would, if anything, have expected to gain time on Quintana in the first week.
PremierAndrew said:hrotha said:Contenders who have lost time in the first week:
Contador (crashes)
Porte (puncture) (if a contender at all)
Pinot (puncheur finish, not really any sort of typical "first-week business")
I don't think Quintana's first week is an indication of anything. Unlike last year, there's hardly been any opportunity to lose time on terrain where he was at a disadvantage.
But he hasn't lost Froome's wheel once, so it's definitely been a major improvement