CBS making me laugh again. Some guy who (allegedly) watches tons of games means Glennon is wayyy better than RG3. He can judge this by what? Actually what is he watching? Questions of questions?
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24257294/cosell-glennon-far-more-advanced-than-rg3-playing-nfl-qb
Anyway, I did not see much of TB or WAS (who would, outside of hardcore fans or coaches?), but I have some numbers (I know QBs are only as good as talent around them, but I
just make the case that RG3 is not worse than Glennon, plus both have miserable teams, so then again they are comparable a little):
RG3 7.3 Y/A, 12.2 Y/C, 5.6 Sack-Pct.;
Glennon 6.2 Y/A (one fu..ing yard per attempt less, that´s night and day in the NFL), 10.0 Y/C (I guess every QB looks good when completing only dink & dunk stuff, I can "make difficult anticipation throws" if I have to complete dump-offs to a RB), 6.4 Sack-Pct.
From only the numbers I see, even on one leg RG3 is actually better than this Glennon guy.
RG3 gets the $hi.tstorm b/c of his INT (I mean what should he have done? It was desperation time trou-out 2nd half, mistakes happen then), but no one mentions the throw a couple of plays before, so I do (watch at 3.33 mins):
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2013111706/2013/REG11/redskins@eagles#menu=highlights&tab=recap
RG3 didn´t really step into that throw (b/c of his knee I guess), and it still traveled 30 yds on a line hitting the receiver in stride.
I suspect Glennon will never be able to do that on two legs, especially not on 3rd and a mile...