I always had a soft spot for GB because I felt Rodgers was a perfect example of how the team is responsible for a teams success and not just the qb. I mean even something as simple as a coin toss. 2 years in a row Rodgers was eliminated from the playoffs when GB was a big threat because the other team won the coin toss for overtime and scored. He could do nothing. In 2014 it was even worse because, well in every alternative universe GB win that game.
I'm going to argue 2011 was worse, simply because of the way it ended. They started the season 13-0. Then, after an upset loss to the Chiefs, decided to coast into the playoffs, resting many players,
mostly on offense. Rodgers had not played for over three weeks when they faced the Giants in the divisional game, a team they had beaten in New York a month earlier. The Giants were playing well, and the Packers fell completely flat. Their defense looked tired, and their highly prolific offense looked completely out of sync and rusty, with receivers dropping a season high 9 passes from Rodgers, thus ending a season where they went 15-1.
I agree with you on them this year. There's talk of Seattle eeking out games and how they could be a .500 team at this point, but I'd say the same about the Packers. The difference is that several of Seattle's wins have been impressive, gut it out, clutch wins. Green Bay? Not really.
I'll say as I did before, in the playoffs, in every overtime each team should be able to get the ball once. The NFL first implemented this OT rule when they changed OT rules, the coup de gras was that 2009 playoff game where the Peyton Manning led Colts lost a playoff game in OT to the Chargers, and Manning was seen on the sidelines, helpless, as the Colts never saw the ball in OT. The following season the rule was changed to how it should be in the playoffs, with both teams offense getting the ball once (unless there's a defensive score that wins the game). Two years later they changed it to where if the first team in OT gets a TD, the game is over. I'm fine with that in the regular season, but not in the playoffs.
GM John Dorsey is crediting Kitchens with Mayfield's 2nd half success in his rookie season...
As an offensive coordinator, with Gregg Williams (more "business" and disciplinary) as HC. I'm not implying Gregg should be their HC, only that Freddie greatly benefited from that, and has been promoted in a classic Peter Principle manner to his level of incompetence. He's not terrible, but he was a great RB/assistant coach and good OC, not a good HC, not for this team, and not for Baker as a HC. My gut tells me as well when Lincoln Riley said he wasn't interested in coaching in the NFL last year, Cleveland's top choice vanished, giving Freddie the job.
Let me be clear, I don't see Cleveland up and canning Freddie on black Monday unless they know they can get Riley next season. League rules prevent them from any kind of business talk about that, but nothing can prevent them from speaking, and this has happened many times in the past. Pete Caroll to Seattle, Jon Gruden back in Oakland, etc. If Riley really wants to coach in the NFL, and he Dorsey and Jimmy Haslam and the Johnson's talk and get along, I can see it happening quickly. If Riley isn't interested, then Freddie has a chance of sticking around. It may require a lot of conversations about what went wrong, and how to fix it, but they could keep him.
A similar situation could happen with Urban Meyer in Washington. Haskins played under him at OSU, and played very well. Plus, Alex Smith played under him in Utah, and Alex has future QB coach written all over him.
As to Baker, he definitely needs work, I do not dispute that at all. He makes way too many mistakes. I just wouldn't completely close the book on him just yet.
Good points on Allen. Buffalo has turned it around big time in just Allen's 2nd yr. This is exactly what owners want to see when they invest so much in a 1st round high draft pick franchise QB. (7th).
I'm going to dig my post up in about 5 years. I believe when we get to the year 2025 the one QB from this draft who will be the closest thing to a star at that time will be Allen. I wasn't one of the ones who said Cleveland should take him first in that draft, but early into his first season, heck even the pre-season, you could see his potential, it was most apparent in a big win over the Vikings. Not just the rocket launcher arm, but able to look across the field, move around well, and run if necessary. He was only making too many errant decisions and throws, but he's slowly but surly cut that down quite a bit. Josh is playing well now, and still has a great deal of upside, and he's just 23 years old.
When people say it's not about wins with QBs, it is in this situation throwing out a 1st rd, high draft pick QB that you trade up to get after just one season for reasons other than non-football related matters. I've never heard of anything like this before. Even Paxton Lynch, as terrible as he was, got 2 yrs at Denver. The Cardinals spent almost $33 mil on 3 QBs in 2018 - Bradford, Rosen, Glennon - who are no longer on the roster!
Yes, crazy!
I don't think Miami will take Tua. I think he's going to fall in the draft further than the 4th or 5th pick (where Miami is likely to pick). But Justin Herbert looks like a pro QB, and I could easily see Miami taking him then, dumping Rosen, and keeping Fitz around, with the expectation that if Herbert doesn't start week 1, it doesn't take long before Fitz is benched and the team belongs to Herbert. But it's still just December, so who knows?
It is however super obvious that Burrow is going #1 to Cincinnati. I'm not going to say he'll be a star there, or even have a great rookie season, but he will most definitely give them a fresh start, and yes, start from week 1 next season, with Dalton gone.