- Dec 7, 2010
- 5,507
- 0
- 0
hrotha said:It's looks like some lame *** generic Decathlon kit.![]()
Better than OPQS? Haha. Well, yeah, it's also better than AIDS and oil spills.scullster46 said:I really don't think they are that bad. They do seem to be very red, but that could also be the lighting used in taking the pictures. Seems better than OPQS and Lotto personally.
FF'Wilco said:
I think that's because the jerseys actually glow.Ney the Viking said:Look at how extremely red they are in the faces on the Cofedis shot. Out in the races it might look way less bright.
hrotha said:Better than OPQS? Haha. Well, yeah, it's also better than AIDS and oil spills.
What I find weird about the Cofidis kit is that the white stripe across the top of the chest draws the eye away from the sponsor's logo, which is kinda defeating the purpose.Cyclingmodel said:Well, I like the FDJ one. Regarding the Cofidis it my looks darker because the logo is not the same as previous years. The 2012 kit will use the Cofidis for mobile specific logo
http://www.cofidis-mobile.fr/
Libertine Seguros said:Looks the same as the mock-up which we all derided as possibly the dullest kit they could probably have created, and after all the negative reaction the team were keen to assuage doubts by saying it was just a prototype and the finished product would not resemble it. I know they're a nice little corporate team, but the other super-corporate teams were at least a little bit more stylish.
I'm getting more pessimistic by the day. I'd rather wear the OPQS kit. At least that is ugly and kind of funny with it. If that is the GreenEdge kit, it is perfect for them - corporate, bland, a bit second tier and inestimably boring.