France2 Report
I see/read a lot of excitement in this thread around that famous France 2 report. I must admit, I watched it twice, and to me it looks much much less damning towards Armstrong than their reports, say, 7 years ago, after Walsh, police, etc investigations. They emit opinions, predictions on what USADA might/will have, but no proven facts. While on the hand the report sounds negative towards Armstrong, it also is manna for his PR, "see? it's all hearsay, hypothesis, frustrated testimonies,..." The public, who do not know the details, might think the same.
About the retested samples, in what degree is it possible that France2 is simply interpreting the contents of USADA's charging letter?
I find it weird, they would mention this in only one sentence, when actually it was considered as "the revelation of the year" here...
Maybe I'm missing something here, but feel free to contradict me.