Nibali : i'm a symbol of a clean sport

Page 9 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Apr 20, 2012
6,320
0
0
Re:

JackRabbitSlims said:
i hate to rain
on your parade

however

these lovely romantic ideas of these amazing specimens of cycling humanity
not performing up to expectations

because of lack of training, feeling a little off, the wrong build up, outside stress & pressure

are imho
complete bollocks

these men are professional athletes paid a lot of money to race their bikes and win
they do it year in year out

the idea that they got something wrong this time around is again
bollocks
they are surrounded by many experts, consultants and advisors to make sure they are performing optimally for the biggest cycling event of the year

they got the mix wrong
they got what goes into the mix wrong

and they are mixing in the wrong circles to get away with their mix

do yah feel me

uci don't like vino
uci don't like oleg
uci like rupert, david, froome walsh

do yah feel me
sounds plausible
 
Nov 23, 2013
366
0
0
Indeed it does seem plausible. UCI has decided to let everyone have all the other races, but when TDF comes, their boys are protected and behold, they have the 3 best cyclists on the planet on the same team.
 
Aug 11, 2012
2,621
24
11,530
Re:

JackRabbitSlims said:
astana are in the last chance saloon remember

for the second time this year

very lucky just to be riding the tour

vino been pulled into line

That's UCI's fault then IMO.....the ENTIRE TEAM should've been given the boot when half the team was busted.

UCI/Cookson are a complete joke.
 
Jul 20, 2015
653
0
0
Am I the only person, who has looked at Nibali's performances this year, read that testing was much more stringent on Mt Teide this year as it was apparently woefully below par last year, saw how dominant Nibali was last year even when Froome & Contador were there, and thought this is little bit suspicious.

Should Nibali be facing tougher questions potential doping in 2014, similar to the questions Froome is facing?
 
Oct 4, 2014
769
18
10,010
gazr99 said:
Am I the only person, who has looked at Nibali's performances this year, read that testing was much more stringent on Mt Teide this year as it was apparently woefully below par last year, saw how dominant Nibali was last year even when Froome & Contador were there, and thought this is little bit suspicious.

Should Nibali be facing tougher questions potential doping in 2014, similar to the questions Froome is facing?
It seems very plausible. Nonetheless, Astana’s performances at the Giro were very suspicious.
 
Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
gazr99 said:
Am I the only person, who has looked at Nibali's performances this year, read that testing was much more stringent on Mt Teide this year as it was apparently woefully below par last year, saw how dominant Nibali was last year even when Froome & Contador were there, and thought this is little bit suspicious.

Should Nibali be facing tougher questions potential doping in 2014, similar to the questions Froome is facing?

All the top guys should face tougher questions. In order to have a clean sport, suspicious performances must be questioned in great detail.
 
Mar 13, 2015
949
0
0
gazr99 said:
Am I the only person, who has looked at Nibali's performances this year, read that testing was much more stringent on Mt Teide this year as it was apparently woefully below par last year, saw how dominant Nibali was last year even when Froome & Contador were there, and thought this is little bit suspicious.

Should Nibali be facing tougher questions potential doping in 2014, similar to the questions Froome is facing?
The thing about Astana is they were almost kicked out of the sport earlier this year. Nobody that is anti-doping thinks they should be anywhere near the race. What sort of questions do you ask these guys?
 
Jul 20, 2015
653
0
0
Eagle said:
gazr99 said:
Am I the only person, who has looked at Nibali's performances this year, read that testing was much more stringent on Mt Teide this year as it was apparently woefully below par last year, saw how dominant Nibali was last year even when Froome & Contador were there, and thought this is little bit suspicious.

Should Nibali be facing tougher questions potential doping in 2014, similar to the questions Froome is facing?
The thing about Astana is they were almost kicked out of the sport earlier this year. Nobody that is anti-doping thinks they should be anywhere near the race. What sort of questions do you ask these guys?

I would start with why are the results from the tests you took during the tour taking so long?

Followed by how do you explain you're form this year, considering you followed last year's blueprint, where obviously you were dominant?
 
Feb 14, 2014
1,687
375
11,180
Eagle said:
The thing about Astana is they were almost kicked out of the sport earlier this year. Nobody that is anti-doping thinks they should be anywhere near the race. What sort of questions do you ask these guys?
"Why are you still here?"
 
May 19, 2015
229
0
0
gazr99 said:
Am I the only person, who has looked at Nibali's performances this year, read that testing was much more stringent on Mt Teide this year as it was apparently woefully below par last year, saw how dominant Nibali was last year even when Froome & Contador were there, and thought this is little bit suspicious.

Should Nibali be facing tougher questions potential doping in 2014, similar to the questions Froome is facing?
I'll grill Vino instead. The fact that he is allowed in the sport is a disgrace.

And he continues to create miracle riders such as Aru and Landa. Even Cataldo looked like one of the strongest riders early in the Giro.
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Re:

SkyTears said:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/night-time-doping-tests-blocked-by-french-law-at-tour-de-france

expecting some of the bad performers of the 2nd week to shine in 3rd week
Not sure I understand? There haven't been any night tests since they entered France so it has got nothing to do with their performance.
 
Mar 27, 2015
444
0
0
i don't think they were aware that they can't be tested, still living in fear. now that the green light is out, free for all.
 
Apr 15, 2014
4,254
2,341
18,680
He means that: teams/riders thought night-time testing was going to happen this Tour but *now* it seems it's not legal to do so.
 
Mar 27, 2015
444
0
0
do you have any link to such an article?
still trying to figure why so many people sucked so hard in 2nd week
 
Jul 17, 2015
774
0
0
Nibali taking 2 minutes out of the best climbers iin the world.

Shock and awe, Kimmy boy, shock and awe.
 
Oct 4, 2014
769
18
10,010
Re:

SeriousSam said:
You make it seem like he was the strongest climber today. He wasn't.
Still very impressive (strange?superhuman?) though. it took him 45:36 to complete La Toussuire after having been alone for about 50km...
 
Aug 31, 2012
7,550
3
0
Re: Re:

franic said:
SeriousSam said:
You make it seem like he was the strongest climber today. He wasn't.
Still very impressive (strange?superhuman?) though. it took him 45:36 to complete La Toussuire after having been alone for about 50km...
You're quite right.. hm. I do wonder know where he would've ended up had he not gone by himself.

Perhaps one of the power experts can estimate this for us, like they did with Froome and Gesink.
 
Oct 4, 2014
769
18
10,010
Re: Re:

SeriousSam said:
franic said:
SeriousSam said:
You make it seem like he was the strongest climber today. He wasn't.
Still very impressive (strange?superhuman?) though. it took him 45:36 to complete La Toussuire after having been alone for about 50km...
You're quite right.. hm. I do wonder know where he would've ended up had he not gone by himself.

Perhaps one of the power experts can estimate this for us, like they did with Froome and Gesink.
My impression is that he would have ended third after Nairo and Froome or second with Froome. Just using an eyeballing metric he looks stronger than Valverde and Contador and weaker than Quintana.
 
May 29, 2011
3,549
1,651
16,680
Re:

SeriousSam said:
You make it seem like he was the strongest climber today. He wasn't.
he was quite clearly the strongest rider today. this does not necessarily mean that he could have destroyed quintana or froome on the final climb had he not attacked early on, ie been the strongest climber. probably not, in the end.

but for better or worse nibali is not your standard leave it to the last climb dragster, but appears to benefit from having the hard part of the race last more than an hour, ie distribute near to full gas intensity over a longer period. and he was insane on this stage.