Siriuscat said:
As a Berto fan I'm obviously a bit disappointed that he's been caught and burned but in the grand scheme of things I think the year is a reasonable compromise....IF he accepts it. If he argues he'll lose and get the two years, might still happen anyway.
To me there are enough questions in parts of this whole case that could have it thrown on technicalities, the UCI messing about andsitting on the thing, a lab that doesn't have to report the AAF because it's below the WADA reporting limits, etc etc etc.
Do I think he dopes, yes probably, him and all the rest. Only rider I think is doing it right is Tommy Voeckler, however, I been a fan of Berto for years now, that won't change so don't bother lambasting me for that. I hope someone REALLY steps up to the mark in july otherwise baby chops Schleck will win....oh whoopee!!
It doesn't matter if Contador accepts it or not, he's getting 2 years. WADA and the UCI will appeal and get it increased to 2 years.
Do you people even follow the sport or past doping cases? Because if you did, you would know that WADA and the UCI will file a joint appeal. Guaranteed.
And given the pathetic logic used by the correct Spanish federation ("nobody can prove how it got into his system") he will definitely get 2 years. It's not up to WADA or the UCI to prove HOW it got into his body. It's like the Spanish federation thinks this is the first time an athlete said "Gee, I don't know how it got in my body."
The burden to prove that it was contaminated meat falls on Contador's legal team.
They clearly failed to prove it was contaminated meat.
2 years will be given by CAS. No doubt about this whatsoever. The only people who don't seem to know this is an inevitable outcome are:
- Alberto Contador (dopers all think they will be exonerated even though WADA has a 99.999% conviction rate)
- Contador's entire legal team, who only cares about billable hours
- Bjarne Riis
- 90% of the people who post in here