issoisso said:At least if he's convicted he'll have plenty of time to stay home doing the macarena
*rimshot*
Now, I wait to see how many got my incredibly lame joke![]()
JA.Tri said:CN today "...The CAS decision will be the last chapter in the long story of whether or not the Tour de France winner should be banned for having returned a positive sample for clenbuterol. ..."
substitute "lastest and hopefully last chapter"...
RownhamHill said:I noticed that as well - does that suggest that Contador has got off and WADA has briefed off the record that it won't take any appeal's further?
(Or probably, more likely, someone at CN copy and pasted off a CAS press-release!)
jilbiker said:My analysis of this charade is that Contador was given not guilty. If he was found guilty, this verdict would have been out so quick, speed records will be broken. It appears UCI, WADA really bungled this. The case (or no case) of ClenB for several sportsmen in the last few months has made this case a joke. The problem is how does CAS present this so that everyone appears to be winner. I think that is the complexity of this case. It will be a very interesting verdict to read.
issoisso said:At least if he's convicted he'll have plenty of time to stay home doing the macarena
*rimshot*
Now, I wait to see how many got my incredibly lame joke![]()
Siriuscat said:No need to drag his wife into things......YES VERY LAME!! but thought one of us better respond
Havetts said:Who betted that $5? Not bad![]()
sniper said:My take on things is that Barak has already made up his mind long ago, but is having problems convincing the other two.
The other two are most likely negotiating a deal with Barak as we speak, urging him to give them a fair share of the deal he made with Riis.
jilbiker said:My analysis of this charade is that Contador was given not guilty. If he was found guilty, this verdict would have been out so quick, speed records will be broken. It appears UCI, WADA really bungled this. The case (or no case) of ClenB for several sportsmen in the last few months has made this case a joke. The problem is how does CAS present this so that everyone appears to be winner. I think that is the complexity of this case. It will be a very interesting verdict to read.
bridgeman said:This is my thinking as well. It was easy to give Contador a pass, but they are struggling with the difficulty of explaining it.
LaFlorecita said:Blablabla, are you still on that bribery thing? Get over it, you're no longer a child, right?
LOL.palmerq said:I dont think this will ever be solved, just permanently delayed... contardor for the giro again!
Escarabajo said:LOL.
Whatever the outcome is, I'll have mix feelings about it. If he is banned then I'll feel a little bad because I enjoy watching him racing. At the same time it seems to be a lot of natural talent in him. Putting legal stuff aside, It looks like he doped, but so did most of the other GC contenders.
thehog said:That’s the world we live in. A little bit of doping is ok. Out of control full-scale systematic team-wide doping maybe a thing of the past but a bloodbag here and there along with some Clen to drop some weight is ok.
We get the races the UCI wants us to see - they accept with a little bit of doping as being ok. That’s what the passport is. Its not a anti-doping tool but a dope control controlling tool so doping doesn’t become like Puerto again.
I’m with you. I’d hate to see him banned. He’s adds so much to the races with his style. Alas the rules are the rules. Yes most are leveling themselves and aiding their recovery with some form of medication so it’s hard to come down are Contador alone.
For me it’s one part emotional and one part applying the rules.
LaFlorecita said:That could be it.![]()
LaFlorecita said:This is how I think as well. If they find him guilty, the only thing they have to refer to is strict liability, so the writing of the resolution would not take as long as it is doing now.
sniper said:Anyway, you like AC alot, I sort of dislike the guy.
Since opposites attract, maybe we should hang out together one time?
this time nointended
![]()
Nilsson said:Strict liability would (almost certainly) not do the trick. With letting go Ovtcharov, Nielsen, Van Hout and all the soccer players WADA itself already took care of that..
