dlwssonic said:The title is really deceiving. I actually thought he got banned![]()
As soon as he's has the yellow jersey, WADA will issue a press release saying they are accusing Contador for Blooddoping.
dlwssonic said:The title is really deceiving. I actually thought he got banned![]()
Parrulo said:are we talking about 39 year old chris horner getting the best results of his life at an age 99% of cyclists are already retired?
chris horner is the imagine of clean cycling. . . .
p.s. contador was found innocent, like it or not. he has all the right in the world to ride. the uci appealed but just because the uci appealed it doesn't make him guilty. what if just because the uci appealed he wasn't able to ride all year and then was found innocent again?
I'm curious to know how ASO would lose a lot of money if Contador did not ride at this stage. I guess their income comes mainly from the payments that towns make to host the start or end of stages, and for television rights (although I've no idea how that works in terms of contracts between the purchasing media and ASO or France2 (who supply the video feed)). I would have thought that many media contracts were already in place by this stage. But I'm only guessing.Siriuscat said:Christian Prudhomme and his cronies including the UCI would have cried if Alberto had not been racing, they would have lost a fortune. It's all about the money.
Johnnyg said:http://www.bicycling.com/tour-de-france/tour-features/pushing-40-and-getting-faster?page=0,2
Chris Horners quote
"Well, first off, I don’t think he should have won the Tour de France for that year (2010). Because I believe if you did test positive for a performance-enhancing substance like clenbuterol, then you’re out of the race."
He is not the only pro with this view. Not they are anti AC, so much as they are frustrated with how one rider can be treated so differently than another, and the rules flip flop. All other riders that have been caught with Clenb. in their system were banned.......so why is AC being treated with kid gloves.
Money and politics.......that is why. They go hand and hand.
gustienordic said:But if AC has a hearing with CAS, what do you think his chances are? CAS is notorious for ruling against people. I don't think Contador has a chance against CAS. They are very strict.
sniper said:PReudhomme and ASO must have properly informed themselves of AC's chances against CAS before they decided to let him ride.
So I'm rather assuming that his chances aren't all that bad.
gustienordic said:But if AC has a hearing with CAS, what do you think his chances are? CAS is notorious for ruling against people. I don't think Contador has a chance against CAS. They are very strict.
JRTinMA said:In the team presser Contador just said he was the most tested rider in the sport. Classic stuff.
Siriuscat said:From Armstrong this was his typical BS but in the last year I wouldn't want to bet against that being the truth about Alberto
JRTinMA said:I wouldn't doubt he is the most tested either, seems fair as a rider who tested positive in the 2010 tour. The statement is BS because it implies he is clean because of the testing. Its the typical BS...
roundabout said:In terms of in-competition testing I would have probably picked someone like Greipel for 2010, but then again I'm not a Contador fanboy.
As for other testing one can only guess.
JRTinMA said:In the team presser Contador just said he was the most tested rider in the sport. Classic stuff.
Weapons of @ss Destruction said:You must be confusing quotes and statements from different TdF winning riders, because what Contador was quoted as saying, according to the CN article, is;
"I’ve undergone a lot of (anti-doping) controls and during my career because I’ve won a lot."
Glad to be able to clear that up for you.
bianchigirl said:Riis is actually correct - as the system stands, Contador is free to ride - due process and all that.
The scapegoating of one rider achieves nothing - that way we get more Pantanis and the Festinas (most recently the Lotto/BMC scandal) are conveniently swept under the carpet. Until the sport acknowledges once and for all that doping is not about bad apples but the whole f*cking barrel then there's no hope for it
So yes, blame the system, not the rider
Kender said:havn't seen this mentioned anywhere else sorry if it has been...
Alberto Contador booed at Tour launch
Albuterol Clentador might need to watch himself at the top of the mountains
Andynonomous said:"Luxembourg's Andy Shleck, runner-up to Contador in 2009 and last year, earned the loudest cheers,"
I agree that Contador should be booed, but to cheer Shleck, who is almost certainly a doper too, is more than a bit hypocritical.
Most fans aren't Clinic regulars and they don't even know about Fränk and Fuentes. It's not a matter of hypocrisy but of lack of information.Andynonomous said:"Luxembourg's Andy Shleck, runner-up to Contador in 2009 and last year, earned the loudest cheers,"
I agree that Contador should be booed, but to cheer Shleck, who is almost certainly a doper too, is more than a bit hypocritical.
D-Queued said:This is the ABC's of cycling.
Anything But Contador (aka latest notorious doper).
Dave.
