• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession)

Page 104 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Race Radio said:

Actually the movie gets panned.

http://m.hollywoodreporter.com/review/armstrong-lie-venice-review-619294

One of Gibney’s key questions -- why stage a comeback that would prove fatal and, in the long run, reveal and ruin everything? -- is never forcefully addressed and there’s no satisfactory, in-depth answer that explains why Armstrong chose to use the performance-enhancing drugs and lie about it until very recently, when federal investigations were ongoing. The filmmaker does hint at the possibility that the cyclist -- who continues to claim he was “clean” during the 2009 Tour (in which he placed third) and its disastrous 2010 follow-up (23rd place) -- is trying to influence his own narrative even in front of Oprah and Gibney’s cameras. It can't be a good sign if your subject seems to have the last word.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
thehog said:

Opinions are like.....well you know, everyone has one

More from the Variety review

Technical assembly is outstanding. One of the film’s chief pleasures is the ample coverage it affords the act of cycling itself via the scenic and well-edited Tour de France footage, a reminder that this sport, however compromised, remains a remarkable human undertaking. In a personal touch that befits a documentary in which he became more personally invested than usual, Gibney handles the narration duties himself.

Sounds like a film fans of the sport would enjoy. No surprise, Alex has won the Oscar for best documentary and it has been said he "is becoming the most important documentarian of our time" Talented guy
 
Jun 19, 2009
5,220
0
0
Race Radio said:
Opinions are like.....well you know, everyone has one

More from the Variety review



Sounds like a film fans of the sport would enjoy. No surprise, Alex has won the Oscar for best documentary and it has been said he "is becoming the most important documentarian of our time" Talented guy

Perhaps he could film a postscript interview with Armstrong. "How does it feel to see a clean Chris Horner leading the Vuelta?"
I do believe that vein in Lance's head would finally explode...
 
Race Radio said:
Opinions are like.....well you know, everyone has one

More from the Variety review



Sounds like a film fans of the sport would enjoy. No surprise, Alex has won the Oscar for best documentary and it has been said he "is becoming the most important documentarian of our time" Talented guy

Cinema is subjective. One mans gold is another mans rotten tomato.

Let the punters decide. They don't need to be told.

I'll go see the movie. I think it will be interesting. But I don't want Lance controlling the narrative.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Oldman said:
Perhaps he could film a postscript interview with Armstrong. "How does it feel to see a clean Chris Horner leading the Vuelta?"
I do believe that vein in Lance's head would finally explode...

Maybe he will launch another comeback? Oh, wait. Nope. That is not possible anymore.
 
thehog said:
http://m.hollywoodreporter.com/review/armstrong-lie-venice-review-619294
...One of Gibney’s key questions -- why stage a comeback that would prove fatal and, in the long run, reveal and ruin everything?...
This assumes that the occasion of Pharmstrong's "comeback," and not his snub of FLandis, was the proximate cause of his ruination.
 
StyrbjornSterki said:
This assumes that the occasion of Pharmstrong's "comeback," and not his snub of FLandis, was the proximate cause of his ruination.

Because the film began at the comeback when LA was full of beans it will be interesting to contrast to his demise.

But agree. Breaking the Bro code on Floyd was his biggest downfall.

Landis took a bullet for that guy over and over and over again.

But it just proves what Lance was. A piece of sh!t. Gutter mud.

The worst part is he probably still doesn't get it.
 
Nov 8, 2012
12,104
0
0
thehog said:
Because the film began at the comeback when LA was full of beans it will be interesting to contrast to his demise.

But agree. Breaking the Bro code on Floyd was his biggest downfall.

Landis took a bullet for that guy over and over and over again.

But it just proves what Lance was. A piece of sh!t. Gutter mud.

The worst part is he probably still doesn't get it.

Oh, he gets it.

He just still thinks he can manipulate the outcome.
 
Race Radio said:
Maybe he will launch another comeback? Oh, wait. Nope. That is not possible anymore.

Lance%2BArmstrong%2BPodium%2B2005.jpg




I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles.
 
I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles.
Yeah, that Lance quote is now a "sorry" classic. Can you believe it's already been a year since his world started collapsing? What an epic tale. Anyone know if he will doing a triathlon in the near future, or competing in anything for that matter?
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
More positive reviews for Gibney's movie

http://blog.screenweek.it/2013/09/v...e=swblog&utm_campaign=wordtwit&utm_medium=web

Gibney makes a good movie that looks him straight in the eyes, a man who has always lied in the eyes of others, and it manages to tell the system cycling with competence and without technicalities, revealing the relationships between colleagues and superiors as those of a peculiar Mafia. Even away from the chilling stories of war or economic Gibney knows the secret narrative to address the myths and mitolgie and take them apart, without giving in to cynicism. Hats off.

http://www.rfi.fr/europe/20130903-t...venise?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

a stunning documentary by Alex Gibney.
 
Aug 7, 2010
1,247
0
0
Bosco10 said:
Yeah, that Lance quote is now a "sorry" classic. Can you believe it's already been a year since his world started collapsing? What an epic tale. Anyone know if he will doing a triathlon in the near future, or competing in anything for that matter?

He now 'plays' (big stretch) drums for a band at non-sanctioned events.
 
thehog said:
Cinema is subjective. One mans gold is another mans rotten tomato.

Let the punters decide. They don't need to be told.

I'll go see the movie. I think it will be interesting. But I don't want Lance controlling the narrative.

Cinema is subjective to a point. A film maker cannot spend time spinning the narrative so it can be all things to all people. Gibney's track record of making quality documentaries makes me comfortable saying that at the very least it will be interesting and provocative.

That's pretty much anyone can ask for, whether you agree with the subject matter and how it's presented or not.

As for Lance controlling the narrative, he can say and do what he wants. The evidence is out there, his reaction to it is part of the public record, and he no longer matters in the cycling world, the cancer community or the world of commercial product endorsement.

He is going to get sued by a few wronged parties and will have to pay for his years of lying, bullying and intimidation the only way it will hurt him-his wallet.

Whatever Armstrong does or doesn't do or say going forward, that is good enough for me.
 
thehog said:
Cinema is subjective. One mans gold is another mans rotten tomato.

Let the punters decide. They don't need to be told.

I'll go see the movie. I think it will be interesting. But I don't want Lance controlling the narrative.

Sony is hoping you'll see and spread the word just as Universal/Comcast hoped the muppets would with "We Steal Secrets. . .". I think you'll be pleasantly surprised that former Indy film maker turned corporate fair haired boy will not disappoint you and your type. The transparency will be as clear as the water that runs down your drain.
 
hektoren said:
Whoa! Great news! Seems like it wasn't going to die quietly after all!

Acceptance Insurance is trying to prove a yearslong conspiracy and cover-up by Armstrong to commit fraud. It wants to know when several of Armstrong's personal and business associates — including ex-wife Kristin Armstrong, team officials, the cyclist's lawyers and International Cycling Union President Pat McQuaid — first learned of his doping

even the rats on the Titanic met their fate

Lets hope "team officials" includes Hog and Weisel, maybe even Johnston

Yay! JV gets a gong:
Postal rider Jonathan Vaughters testified that she handed riders cortisone pills wrapped in foil.

And the best news:
The Acceptance lawsuit is just one of several pending against Armstrong.

Federal prosecutors have joined a whistle-blower lawsuit that seeks to recover more than $30 million in sponsorship money paid to Armstrong by the U.S. Postal Service. SCA Promotions, a Dallas-based insurance company, has sued for $12 million it paid him in performance bonuses. And in California, a federal judge is considering a class-action lawsuit against Armstrong by readers of his book "It's Not About the Bike" that claims fraud and false advertising.

Phil Liggett won't be flying in Lances private jet for much longer
 
Jul 19, 2010
741
1
0
I got a ticket to see the world premiere of "The Armstrong Lie" at the Toronto International Film Festival. Depends on how the filmmakers portray Cancer Boy, I'll be asking them questions at the Q&A afterwards. If you have any question you want me to relay to the filmmakers, let me know.

Will report back after the screening.
 
sittingbison said:
even the rats on the Titanic met their fate

Lets hope "team officials" includes Hog and Weisel, maybe even Johnston

Yay! JV gets a gong:


And the best news:


Phil Liggett won't be flying in Lances private jet for much longer

I'm thinking, if Lance doesn't want to testify, couldn't he just pay the 3 million and be done with it?
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
hektoren said:
This is pretty big news. He is in a right fix.

I got a laugh from the opening paragraph:
AUSTIN, Texas -- A Texas judge is pushing Lance Armstrong closer to his first sworn testimony on details of his performance-enhancing drug use, ordering the cyclist to answer questions about who knew what and when about his doping, including possibly his ex-wife and his attorneys.

It of course will be his second time - perhaps we can call it 'Sworn Testimony 2.0".


Bosco10 said:
I'm thinking, if Lance doesn't want to testify, couldn't he just pay the 3 million and be done with it?
But that would only lead him open to all the other lawsuits that are pending, which would extract a lot more than $3 million.

His only option appears to be trying to avoid trial and settle at a reduced fee. Thats would still be expensive.