Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession)

Page 145 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Nov 7, 2013
146
0
0
Bosco10 said:
Hi gooner. I've read Wheelmen, and am familiar with what the authors described. My first impression: USADA told Levinstein about the "5 tours & 6 months" deal. However, upon reading again, it seems USADA had this deal in mind, but they didn't verbalize it to Lance's legal team. So I'm a bit confused as to what the authors were actually saying.

I think that 6 months is what they would have given him if he confessed. Lance not knowing what the penalty would be just went into attack mode. I am willing to bet that many of the other rider who got 6 month bans did not know what their penalty would be exactly prior to their confession. It would be silly for USADA to state what the penalty would be before a confession due to the fact that it may remove all incentive for truthfulness and full disclosure. His teammates likely got very short bans due to all the information they gave was consistent with what they already knew.
 
MonkeyFace said:
I think that 6 months is what they would have given him if he confessed. Lance not knowing what the penalty would be just went into attack mode. I am willing to bet that many of the other rider who got 6 month bans did not know what their penalty would be exactly prior to their confession. It would be silly for USADA to state what the penalty would be before a confession due to the fact that it may remove all incentive for truthfulness and full disclosure. His teammates likely got very short bans due to all the information they gave was consistent with what they already knew.

Don't agree. I think it was a carefully negotiated deal, in particularly the part which involved Garmin related personnel. The rest of the confessors hitched onto the bandwagon.

Note: viewpoint is only related to the USADA "confessions".
 
Nov 7, 2013
146
0
0
Dazed and Confused said:
Don't agree. I think it was a carefully negotiated deal, in particularly the part which involved Garmin related personnel. The rest of the confessors hitched onto the bandwagon.

Note: viewpoint is only related to the USADA "confessions".

Even at that, there is no point to giving the same deal to everyone. Deals are given first come, first served. There is no incentive for any cooperation if everyone thinks they can hold out for the same deal.
 
MonkeyFace said:
Even at that, there is no point to giving the same deal to everyone. Deals are given first come, first served. There is no incentive for any cooperation if everyone thinks they can hold out for the same deal.

Depends on the objective. If the objective was solely nailing Armstrong then efficiency and consistency would be key.
 
Nov 7, 2013
146
0
0
Dazed and Confused said:
Depends on the objective. If the objective was solely nailing Armstrong then efficiency and consistency would be key.

I don't know what you are talking about. Tygart got what he wanted and the only people who got burned were the people who didn't participate. Armstrong could have had it just as easy.
 
MonkeyFace said:
I don't know what you are talking about. Tygart got what he wanted and the only people who got burned were the people who didn't participate. Armstrong could have had it just as easy.

Don't agree. Armstrong was the target. in just about everybody eyes hes much more than doper. No way he would have gotten a 6 months deal.
 
Nov 7, 2013
146
0
0
Dazed and Confused said:
Don't agree. Armstrong was the target. in just about everybody eyes hes much more than doper. No way he would have gotten a 6 months deal.

Well, maybe you should write a book. You seem to know more than the authors of Wheelmen who put in the leg work to talk with almost everyone involved in this affair.
 
86TDFWinner said:

Excellent news. The Boss has spoken. Cookson is now can dismiss Wiesel and Plant. It seems like Cookson has little to no relationship with Bach, so you won't have quite the ridiculous displays of corruption like you had with Verbruggen's pal.

IF Armstrong gets his victory lap then it will look ridiculous and Cookson will really be in a good place to appear as shocked as Captain Renault.
 
Dazed and Confused said:
Don't agree. I think it was a carefully negotiated deal, in particularly the part which involved Garmin related personnel. The rest of the confessors hitched onto the bandwagon.

Note: viewpoint is only related to the USADA "confessions".

The whole thing on USADA's side was not likely to happen without letting some stuff pass.

For me, none of the people behind the scenes totally deserving lifetime bans have had their walk of shame. But, I think you have to acknowledge the good that did come out and how unlikely that outcome was.
 
DirtyWorks said:
The whole thing on USADA's side was not likely to happen without letting some stuff pass.

For me, none of the people behind the scenes totally deserving lifetime bans have had their walk of shame. But, I think you have to acknowledge the good that did come out and how unlikely that outcome was.

The part I agree with is going after the big boy. Thats was the right way and perhaps lack of resources meant the objective needed to be very focused. So with Armstrong gone, I'm still waiting for the follow up. Perhaps Cookson's T&R will get us somewhere.
 
Nov 7, 2013
146
0
0
Dazed and Confused said:
No need to ask around, they could have used their brains instead.

Well, maybe you should write a book. You seem to know more than the authors of Wheelmen who put in the leg work to talk with almost everyone involved in this affair.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
MonkeyFace said:
I don't know what you are talking about. Tygart got what he wanted and the only people who got burned were the people who didn't participate. Armstrong could have had it just as easy.

Armstrong was never going to throw Ferrari, Bruyneel, UCI and others under the bus.

It is too late now for Armstrong. He may, if he gives a lot of info about UCI collaboration, Ferrari and others, get his lifetime reduced to 12-year ban.

That for me is letting him off the hook. Armstrong should never be allowed compete again.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Benotti69 said:
Armstrong was never going to throw Ferrari, Bruyneel, UCI and others under the bus.

It is too late now for Armstrong. He may, if he gives a lot of info about UCI collaboration, Ferrari and others, get his lifetime reduced to 12-year ban.

That for me is letting him off the hook. Armstrong should never be allowed compete again.
But what if that's a precondition for Lance to engage in busthrowundery?
If he brings down Verbruggen tomorrow in exchange for sentence reduction, i'd be all for that.
On the other hand, i'm not sure if Armwrong has enough ammunition to really harm Heinous.
Hein is like garden weed. Useless, but keeps growing back.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
sniper said:
But what if that's a precondition for Lance to engage in busthrowundery?
If he brings down Verbruggen tomorrow in exchange for sentence reduction, i'd be all for that.
On the other hand, i'm not sure if Armwrong has enough ammunition to really harm Heinous.
Hein is like garden weed. Useless, but keeps growing back.

I think that if Armstrong should throw everyone under the bus then let us reappraise as to whether he is repentant and wants to truly help the sport.

I am happy for Armstrong to have the 'death penalty'. What he did to people is worse than just receiving a lifetime ban.

We must not forget that Armstrong was not just another doper. He destroyed careers and took the sport deeper into doping and the levels of manipulation were massive.

Hein is another IOC mafioso. There are many. Expecting IOC to clean up is crazy.
 
Benotti69 said:
...
We must not forget that Armstrong was not just another doper. He destroyed careers and took the sport deeper into doping and the levels of manipulation were massive.

Hein is another IOC mafioso. There are many. Expecting IOC to clean up is crazy.

All true. The problems with Armstrong actually going straight are:

#1 He's no longer a legend in his own mind. He'd have to be another person entirely. The lies have changed, but other than that he's not changed a single bit. We still don't know if he can tell truth from fiction.

#2 It gives some life to the scale of corruption at the IOC sport federation level. Fundamentally, that's a big part of what still goes on at least in cycling. Bach will not like the IOC image of sport tarnished regardless of how many viewers cycling delivers.

He can rewrite some stuff for Cookson's show and it should look as ridiculous as his latest round of promotional interviews if it goes public. Fight Wonderboy! Fight!
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
MonkeyMouth said:
Man, I can't wait for that T and R **** to start.... Sorry - gotta go play golf now....it's sooooo self-policing..

Armstrong thinks T&R is a get out of jail free card. If it proves to be it will mean that nothing will change in sport. I think Cookson will let Armstrong go free!
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
DirtyWorks said:
All true. The problems with Armstrong actually going straight are:

#1 He's no longer a legend in his own mind. He'd have to be another person entirely. The lies have changed, but other than that he's not changed a single bit. We still don't know if he can tell truth from fiction.

#2 It gives some life to the scale of corruption at the IOC sport federation level. Fundamentally, that's a big part of what still goes on at least in cycling. Bach will not like the IOC image of sport tarnished regardless of how many viewers cycling delivers.

He can rewrite some stuff for Cookson's show and it should look as ridiculous as his latest round of promotional interviews if it goes public. Fight Wonderboy! Fight!
sure, but it's not all about lance telling the truth. what if he can showthe truth? what if he has actual documents/emails, etc. implicating heinous? not that i think he does, but he might and then it might be worth hearing lance sing.