BroDeal said:Yup. Hincapie comes across as a lot more credible than Andreu here.
Funny enough, so does Armstrong.
I wouldn't believe a word Armstrong said about Frankie or anyone with whom he'd had a beef.
Hincapie doesn't usually say much. Interesting to have all that commentary on the record from him. Does come off somewhat credible, and is frankly more believable than the story from Frankie.
I don't doubt Frankie tired of the whole program at Postal, doping, Armstrong, Bruyneel, and what appeared to be a rather toxic environment of all Lance all the time. I would not be surprised however if Frankie has under-reported the extent of his doping.
Makes no difference to me with regard to the real reason Armstrong is slamming him again, that he told the truth about Armstrong's BS.
But what about Hincapie's extensive comments, the bulk of that article?