- Aug 10, 2010
- 6,285
- 2
- 17,485
Oldman said:I was baiting slightly on the Tebow thing but you got the gist of Lance's character analysis. He felt entitled to grab anything, possibly because of his upbringing....but some character seems ingrained.
As for Mark's assertion the USAC "groomed" him: he was among the willing to step up and take dope. Period. That character was imitated by Tyler, George, Christian, Levi and others. Some were less successful and still others showed character and refused. The riders that refused were left on the outside because the details of the LIE need to involve all that benefitted. Lance, Thom Weisel, Gorski all knew that because they were all cheaters in most phases of their professional life. Lance gravitated to it and lent authority to that attitude.
It is unfair to throw Tebow into that mix other than to shed light on the shallowness that some athletes will go to expand marketability. Tebow only had a limited act, so let's find another comparison for that.
Mark's wrong, though. Lance was a sociopath looking for a venue. Why else would he struggle to get back to Tri sports?
I agree with a lot of what you say. Do you agree with this: From the very beginning, and from the perspective of all the participants (and not necessarily from a wholesome or even realistic perspective), Lance, USAC (and later the UCI) were a perfect dream of a match. They thought they were a match made in heaven.
I'm not arguing that Lance's moral outlook was shaped by USAC/UCI. I'm arguing that USAC saw Lance exactly for what he was and created the environment needed to make him a champion. In other words, USAC was Lance's first "gang." That gang taught him, supported him, and promoted him. Without that gang, he would have been a nothing.
