D-Queued said:With respect to the CIRC Report, however, it would seem that Armstrong could still add some not-yet-disclosed insight into the unique role and unique partnership that he obtained with the UCI to further his ongoing deception.
Thus, if it were only about his ban, wouldn't it make sense for him to sing like a canary?
If the point of the report were to actually address issues? Yes. But, as others have summarized, the entire report seems to exist to put some pressure on Verbruggen to abdicate.
In particular, the CIRC authors retell the "anti-doping is now independent" lie and expect it to stick. It also is strategically misinforms on anti-doping authority role WADA standard elsewhere.