It's because Omerta still exists and Chris doesn't want to be called out on his career.
Crazy Stat Shows Just How Common Doping Was In Cycling When Lance Armstrong Was Winning The Tour de France
Lance Armstrong was not alone, he was just better at it.www.google.com
"More importantly for Lance Armstrong during the 7-year window when he won every Tour de France (1999-2005), 87% of the top-10 finishers (61 of 70) were confirmed dopers or suspected of dopers."
This time period was simply the Tour de dope. Lol. The top GC guys were all on gear - and using the same substances. Armstrong was the best placed doper.
-
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I cannot believe I'm writing this, but after what I've witnessed this YEAR from Pog, give Lance back his victories. There is clearly a new King of The Most Sophisticated Doping Program In History (TMSDPIH for short).
Much more prestigious than LTDF, IGDI, and LVAE combined!!
give Ricco his stage wins back too
if Lance wasn't the biggest piece *** in cycling i'd agree but since he is *** him
Couldn’t disagree more: Pogacar could be a fraud in using PEDs but Armstrong was one of the biggest frauds of all time, hoodwinking cancer victims, charitable organizations, U.S. presidents, as well as his sponsors.
What does moral has to do with whether one won tdf or not?
I like reason and logic and try and use them at all times. . . Except when it comes to Armstrong
I find him to be a compelling character. Would I want to be his friend? Not sure about that, but as entertainment goes, he's top notch (for a cyclist)I like reason and logic and try and use them at all times. . . Except when it comes to Armstrong
If you lived in the states when he was on top it was so sad to see otherwise smart people investing their interest and energy into LiveStrong. I had a surgeon who was like the doctor’s doctor—well regarded by everyone, top of his profession, but he was so proud of the Lance autographed yellow jersey he had framed and on the wall of his office.
We can probably agree that was the responsibility of those people to think and behave that way, to their ultimate detriment. So I think my caustic response to Armstrong is not just about him but about what he represents: the stupid need to stupidly idolize media created “heroes” when we have no idea what kind of person they are.
I probably would have been the same if I had been around that time. Nowadays I can't hate on an old haggard alcoholic narcissistic man. I would stay clear of him definitely though. He's a predatorian animal for sure (all humans are but some are more so lol)I like reason and logic and try and use them at all times. . . Except when it comes to Armstrong
The irony is the foundation should have probably stuck with him ... he has a knack for making *** successful and they've failed without him.
Lance had nothing on The Most Smiling Doping Program In History. Even more potent and a few smiles and Remco butt slaps thrown in to make it look too innocent to be questioned.
Agree with this: Lance is like Darth Vader - went to dark side, compelling to watch when at top of his game (even admirable despite clear flaws) - it’s the ‘empire’ behind him that deserves much of the vitriol.
Armstrong still raised enormous amounts of money for cancer research and got a lot of people riding bikes. I don't buy this narrative that he was some super villain, the people that went on to disparage him were complicit and benefited, although not nearly as much and I think that bred a lot of jealously.
I don't think he was unique in how he doped. I do think he was a generational athletic talent.
What he did was of course wrong and he wasn't a nice guy but his horribleness is really overblown. I think he gets a lot of hate from a nationalistic angle. All the doctors that came up with the doping protocols were European, the athletes that pioneered EPO+test+HGH were European and all the drugs came from Europe.
I don't think he was unique in how he doped. I do think he was a generational athletic talent.
What he did was of course wrong and he wasn't a nice guy but his horribleness is really overblown. I think he gets a lot of hate from a nationalistic angle. All the doctors that came up with the doping protocols were European, the athletes that pioneered EPO+test+HGH were European and all the drugs came from Europe.
Don't forget one of the frauds he had to repay: paying his breakaway companion to give him the final win for the triple crown. He got that prize money and a payout from an insurance policy based on the same success. SCA took premiums as a bet for that success. It cost him $10mil in settlement.
That's the most bald cheat of all...
You add this to your consideration: He was cheating as an amateur, a US team member and all the while; not the best talent on those teams that had clean guys. They just realized they didn't want to cheat and live that lie no matter how many others did. Those guys were the top notch cyclists, IMO.
You need to dig deeper. Amgen is a US company. He had facilitators that helped the whole PR to "charitable" foundation planning. There are probably dozens of other sleazy, fraudulent athletes but few scammed a cancer charity as cover. Then lied about everything and impuned the character of anyone that disagreed with him. If it sound similar and acceptable; I could probably guess US politics don't bother you either.
Spoken like a die-hard Pharmstrong sycophant and apologist. You don't have a clue how much he gave to research, which means "enormous amounts" is an invention.
What is known is that only some of the money his scam raised went to research, and only in the early years, then his "foundation" began channeling everything back into his campaign to "raise cancer awareness." Which means Pharmstrong was spending it traveling around the world to tell people, "Cancer is bad, don't get it." There were published figures claiming that his foundation had raised half a billion USD, which is another way of saying he spent most of $500 million on luxury hotels and fuel for his Gulfstream when a legitimate cancer charity might have actually done something with it to advance the cause of curing cancer.
This was the norm in professional cycling until ten years ago.
TRENDING THREADS
-
World Championships 2024: Men's Road Race (September 29)- Started by Devil's Elbow
- Replies: 2K
-
-
Teams & Riders The Remco Evenepoel is the next Eddy Merckx thread- Started by DNP-Old
- Replies: 28K
-
Women’s RR - World Championships 2024 (September 28)- Started by Samu Cuenca
- Replies: 321
-
Teams & Riders The Great Big Cycling Transfers, Extensions, and Rumours Thread- Started by RedheadDane
- Replies: 10K
-
World Championships 2024 - Men’s TT, September 22- Started by Berniece
- Replies: 424
-
Teams & Riders Tadej Pogačar discussion thread- Started by Lequack
- Replies: 21K
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram