Samson777 said:Yes, that was also what made the Chicken consider suicide.
Opalius said:Hrm. Danny Pate is definitely not happy about Armstrong recent accusations towards the UCI and CO. His recent tweet:
"Sick to death of this LA bull****. Either come out with the proof of these cover ups and corruption, or **** off."
Right you are Danny. We want to see LA's evidence too![]()
Opalius said:Hrm. Danny Pate is definitely not happy...
Granville57 said:FFS, this argument has been gaining WAY too much traction lately by people that should, quite frankly, know better. It's not like USADA didn't provide us all with the details behind their decision, ya' know a REASONED DECISION?
It's all right there. There is absolutely no need to employ short-term memory or selective reading when evaluating exactly what actions USADA took against Armstrong and why. IT'S ALL RIGHT THERE!
-----------------
USADA Reasoned Decision
Page 7
II. CHARGES AGAINST LANCE ARMSTRONG
The anti-doping rule violations for which Mr. Armstrong was sanctioned include:
(1) Use and/or attempted use of prohibited substances and/or methods including EPO,
blood transfusions, testosterone, corticosteroids and/or masking agents.
(2) Possession of prohibited substances and/or methods including EPO, blood transfusions and related equipment (such as needles, blood bags, storage containers and other transfusion equipment and blood parameters measuring devices), testosterone, corticosteroids and/or masking agents.15
(3) Trafficking of EPO, testosterone, and/or corticosteroids.
(4) Administration and/or attempted administration to others of EPO, testosterone, and/or cortisone.
(5) Assisting, encouraging, aiding, abetting, covering up and other complicity involving one or more anti-doping rule violations and/or attempted anti-doping rule violations.
(6) Aggravating circumstances (including multiple rule violations and participated in a sophisticated scheme and conspiracy to dope, encourage and assist others to dope and cover up rule violations) justifying a period of ineligibility greater than the standard sanction.
-----------
Further clarification is provided later in the same document:
-----------
Page 146
VI. EVIDENCE OF ARMSTRONG’S EFFORTS TO SUPPRESS THE TRUTH ABOUT HIS ANTI-DOPING RULE VIOLATIONS
Article 2.8 of the World Anti-Doping Code includes as an anti-doping rule violation, “assisting, encouraging, aiding, abetting, covering up or any other type of complicity involving an anti-doping rule violation or any Attempted anti-doping rule violation.”
Additionally, proof that an athlete “engaged in deceptive or obstructing conduct to avoid the detection or adjudication of an anti-doping rule violation” can be grounds for increasing a sanction. Fraudulent concealment or other efforts to subvert the legal process, such as perjury or witness intimidation can also result in suspension or waiver of the statute of limitations.
Accordingly, in this section USADA discusses some of the evidence of efforts by Armstrong and his entourage to cover up rule violations, suppress the truth, obstruct or subvert the legal process and thereby encourage doping.
---------
The USADA document then provides the specifics behind this reasoning. It's all right there for everyone to read. No mystery. No behavior on the part of USADA that they are not fully entitled to. None.
Allow me to reiterate a few important and pertinent points in all of the above:
"Aggravating circumstances...justifying a period of ineligibility greater than the standard sanction."
"Additionally, proof that an athlete “engaged in deceptive or obstructing conduct to avoid the detection or adjudication of an anti-doping rule violation” can be grounds for increasing a sanction. Fraudulent concealment or other efforts to subvert the legal process, such as perjury or witness intimidation can also result in suspension or waiver of the statute of limitations".
"...can be grounds for increasing a sanction."
Granville57 said:Yeah? Well, Pate is doosh. The disrespectful way in which he treats his then-wife (on camera, no less) in the documentery Blood, Sweat + Gears is inexcusable. So f'ck him.
They were seperated by film's end
(It's part of the doc)
Berzin said:I think of all the guys the Federation weren't protecting. The biggest names at the time-Vino, Ullrich, Basso, Landis, etc.
So just as I believe that Ferrari handling The USPS doping program exclusive of any other tour team was a major advantage for many reasons, so was Armstrong's relationship with Hein Verbruggen.
Armstrong could say his doping practices were conservative, they were not if you include all this.
ChrisE said:Yes, they all got busted after he retired except for JU and his partying act.
Don't think to hard about why that is. It might throw a wrench in your narrative.
Opalius said:Hrm. Danny Pate is definitely not happy about Armstrong recent accusations towards the UCI and CO. His recent tweet:
"Sick to death of this LA bull****. Either come out with the proof of these cover ups and corruption, or **** off."
Right you are Danny. We want to see LA's evidence too![]()
D-Queued said:Not arguing with other posters above, but there is some sense in this.
Armstrong the liar has accused Hein of throwing him under the bus.
With a bit of time to reflect on this, it rather looks the other way around. Lance is throwing Hein under the bus.
Not that Hein doesn't deserve it, or that the claim itself is a falsehood. But Lance is driven by Lance, and accusing yet another person or persons with harming him is the consistent narrative.
Once upon a time weren't these guys going to buy the ASO together? I know, that is so 2008.
Dave.
42x16ss said:WTF does Manzano blowing the whistle have to do with Armstrong? Puerto was a police investigation
![]()
MarkvW said:So far, our only evidence that the UCI helped Lance cheat are words out of Lance Armstrong's mouth and the Sysmex money donation.
Hein could almost persuade me that Lance is a big fat Liar . . . right up until the point where Hein took Lance's big fat check.
I still kinda have problems with that. . . ..
MarkvW said:So far, our only evidence that the UCI helped Lance cheat are words out of Lance Armstrong's mouth and the Sysmex money donation.
Hein could almost persuade me that Lance is a big fat Liar . . . right up until the point where Hein took Lance's big fat check.
I still kinda have problems with that. . . ..
martinvickers said:Need to keep up with the story, man ! (I know, i know, I'm only joking as a segue into this)
Verbruggen backtracks on Armstrong claims
Hog, if you're reading - think of a recent conversation - well, the Wermacht have just announced that they won a decisive battle...at Friedrichsfelde...
mattghg said:Hein is not as good a liar as Lance. He can't keep his story straight.
martinvickers said:Need to keep up with the story, man ! (I know, i know, I'm only joking as a segue into this)
Verbruggen backtracks on Armstrong claims
Hog, if you're reading - think of a recent conversation - well, the Wermacht have just announced that they won a decisive battle...at Friedrichsfelde...
thehog said:Hein v Lance will be a mighty battle!
darwin553 said:Only Lance can be the victor. He has lost pretty much all credibility and has nothing to lose while Hein is holding on to the only shreds of credibility and standing he has left.
darwin553 said:Only Lance can be the victor. He has lost pretty much all credibility and has nothing to lose while Hein is holding on to the only shreds of credibility and standing he has left.
mattghg said:Lance has an awful lot of money left to lose, though...
Puckfiend said:So, Armstrong can't remember the bedside confessional with Frankie and Betsy in the room, and he can't remember details surrounding events involving Emma; but he can remember word for word conversations with Verbruggen. How convenient.