Cycling Weekly (UK) put 19 questions to the UCIincluding Armstrong's alleged financing of the Sysmex machine. No reply was received.
Note question 3 where Cycling Weekly date the $100,000 to have been received by the UCI in May 2006 - one month after the dubious and controversial pro LA Vrijman Report was released.
And why would the UCI be transporting a laboratory type machine around the tour course when they have contracted a professional WADA accredited lab to analyze riders' samples?
Note question 3 where Cycling Weekly date the $100,000 to have been received by the UCI in May 2006 - one month after the dubious and controversial pro LA Vrijman Report was released.
And why would the UCI be transporting a laboratory type machine around the tour course when they have contracted a professional WADA accredited lab to analyze riders' samples?
19 KEY QUESTIONS FOR THE UCI
1. Pat McQuaid said the donation from Mr Armstrong was pledged in 2002 after he and Johan Bruyneel visited UCI headquarters in Aigle. Mr McQuaid said the pledge was made in 2002 but the money did not come in until 2005 when 'a phone call was made'. Why was there the delay?
2. Who telephoned who to chase up the money?
3. Mr McQuaid said the payment was made in 2005 but at the Play the Game conference in October 2007, Mr McQuaid said the money came in 'about 15 months ago', which would make it around May 2006. So when exactly did the money arrive in the UCI bank account? Was it made by bank transfer by Mr Armstrong or by a company?
