Official thread- TDF Stage 7 Barcelone - Andorre Arcalis 224km

Page 25 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
A

Anonymous

Guest
Wheels Go Round and Round said:
Agreed
as I said before the guy is a cat 4 at best

And you are a super pro who has ridden with armstrong and knows just sooooo much more about cycling than anyone ever in the history of the universe.
 
Mar 10, 2009
491
0
9,280
Mellow Velo said:
Over the 3rd cat. Lead now 11 minutes.
53 agrees with me!:)

Only on this one, MV. Don't get cocky. Interesting (or not) that the group that passed me at 26k to go was largely intact at 3k to go.

I do not subscribe to the vast conspiracy theory of yours!! :)
 
Mar 10, 2009
7,268
1
0
I am wondering, both Armstrong and Bruyneel admit that attacking wasn't the plan.

Contador attacked, and now, after the fact, we know it wasn't the plan

Why would first the other captain of the team as well as the DS admit that Contador's attack wasn't planned out, while the attack clearly improved AST position re other contenders. Contador put 20s on other contenders who didn't make up any time, while they were behind. On first sight, that looks like a victory to the team (assuming Contador didn't waste too much energy in the last 2k, so that it'll affect his performance over 3 weeks).

Bruyneel and Armstrong know a bit about PR and dealing with the press.

'Not planned, excellent outcome'. However, we did not know that the former.

Given the continuous reports about infighting, why wouldn't they want to defuse it and state that it had been the plan. In other words, why would they have stated that Contador did not act in accordance with supposed team tactics, while they could have used it to their advantage and spin the perception that everything was swell within the team...

Why not protect Contador, who is on your team as one of the team captains?
 
Jun 26, 2009
276
1
0
Mellow Velo said:
Bruyneel: The modern day definition of hogwash.

Yes . . . you are sooo much more informed than a team director that has led a team to 8 Tour victories. They should just turn team tactics over to you right? Since your knowledge is so superior of course . . . .
 
Apr 24, 2009
206
0
0
Bala Verde said:
I am wondering, both Armstrong and Bruyneel admit that attacking wasn't the plan.

Contador attacked, and now, after the fact, we know it wasn't the plan

Why would first the other captain of the team as well as the DS admit that Contador's attack wasn't planned out, while the attack clearly improved AST position re other contenders. Contador put 20s on other contenders who didn't make up any time, while they were behind. On first sight, that looks like a victory to the team (assuming Contador didn't waste too much energy in the last 2k, so that it'll affect his performance over 3 weeks).

Bruyneel and Armstrong know a bit about PR and dealing with the press.

'Not planned, excellent outcome'. However, we did not know that the former.

Given the continuous reports about infighting, why wouldn't they want to defuse it and state that it had been the plan. In other words, why would they have stated that Contador did not act in accordance with supposed team tactics, while they could have used it to their advantage and spin the perception that everything was swell within the team...

Why not protect Contador, who is on your team as one of the team captains?

Has there actually been a quote from Bruyneel? Everything I have read seems to have come from the post-race interview from Armstrong. I would imagine that being in the media crowd after 6+ hours of riding and a mountaintop finish, maybe setting up a PR strategy wasn't the first priority at the time, and Armstrong was just speaking his mind.
 
May 13, 2009
653
0
0
With only 2 seconds separating LA/AC, LA will have to try to follow AC if he attacks again. He wont be able to afford to lose anymore time to AC if wants to win. That's the big question, will AC attack again before the Alps?

Is AC making a mistake by attacking to soon?
 
Jun 22, 2009
23
0
0
thoughtforyou

Wheels Go Round and Round said:
I remember you saying Lance would be exposed today?:rolleyes:

TFF is a forum hero who is always right and we should just all think like him so the positive energy will flow into his hero's aura.

along the lines of "lance blows - that hyper-doped maggot doesn't deserve to lick the great TFF's sweaty shorts"

;)
 
Jul 7, 2009
189
0
0
frizzlefry said:
With only 2 seconds separating LA/AC, LA will have to try to follow AC if he attacks again. He wont be able to afford to lose anymore time to AC if wants to win. That's the big question, will AC attack again before the Alps?

Is AC making a mistake by attacking to soon?

Why attack it's all down hill finishes. Unless you fall apart on one of the climbs and lose 3-4 minutes anyone dropped has a chance to come back to the leaders on the downhill and it would be just a waste of energy to attack unless you want to go for a stage win. Which is more likely for the riders that are 8-10 minutes off the lead and have no chance in getting even a top 30.
 
Jul 7, 2009
311
0
0
Thoughtforfood said:
And you are a super pro who has ridden with armstrong and knows just sooooo much more about cycling than anyone ever in the history of the universe.

No but I am sure I have raced at a higher level than you but then again we have established that you are indeed an Internet douchebag
 
Jun 22, 2009
23
0
0
Greisty said:
How is repeatedly calling people who always support Armstrong "fanboy" any different than categorically trashing Armstrong, no matter what he does?

I reiterate: your opinion is of no greater value than anyone else's here. You have yet to demonstrate your qualifications other than a truncated understanding of rudimentary bike racing tactics.

And come to think of it: you do spend an awful lot of time posting. Maybe you should consider going for an actual bike ride yourself. You might learn something.

Smack-down! Thanks!:)
 

whiteboytrash

BANNED
Mar 17, 2009
525
0
0
In other news A.Shleck said he could have caught Contador but Conti was aided by the motorbikes at the start of this attack.... I watched a re-run and he's right. Contador was aided by the bikes for about half a minute. Enough to get a lead.... link to follow...
 
Jul 7, 2009
189
0
0
whiteboytrash said:
In other news A.Shleck said he could have caught Contador but Conti was aided by the motorbikes at the start of this attack.... I watched a re-run and he's right. Contador was aided by the bikes for about half a minute. Enough to get a lead.... link to follow...

Andy didn't see the entire astana team right behind him when he made the attempt?
 
May 23, 2009
1,821
1,025
13,680
whiteboytrash said:
In other news A.Shleck said he could have caught Contador but Conti was aided by the motorbikes at the start of this attack.... I watched a re-run and he's right. Contador was aided by the bikes for about half a minute. Enough to get a lead.... link to follow...
I was thinking that as soon as AC entered that first corner behind the moto.
.
I assume its NOT the riders job avoid motos that are pacing ahead of you...?
.
 

whiteboytrash

BANNED
Mar 17, 2009
525
0
0
dgodave said:
I was thinking that as soon as AC entered that first corner behind the moto.
.
I assume its NOT the riders job avoid motos that are pacing ahead of you...?
.



Shleck said as much. That it wasn't Contador's fault but that of the organisations for having friggin motorbikes all over the road.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Thoughtforfood said:
Mirror mirror on the wall...

Is it your goal to be the biggest douchebag on this site?

If so, you win.

Way to go...
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Bala Verde said:
I am wondering, both Armstrong and Bruyneel admit that attacking wasn't the plan.

Contador attacked, and now, after the fact, we know it wasn't the plan

Why would first the other captain of the team as well as the DS admit that Contador's attack wasn't planned out, while the attack clearly improved AST position re other contenders. Contador put 20s on other contenders who didn't make up any time, while they were behind. On first sight, that looks like a victory to the team (assuming Contador didn't waste too much energy in the last 2k, so that it'll affect his performance over 3 weeks).

Bruyneel and Armstrong know a bit about PR and dealing with the press.

'Not planned, excellent outcome'. However, we did not know that the former.

Given the continuous reports about infighting, why wouldn't they want to defuse it and state that it had been the plan. In other words, why would they have stated that Contador did not act in accordance with supposed team tactics, while they could have used it to their advantage and spin the perception that everything was swell within the team...

Why not protect Contador, who is on your team as one of the team captains?

+1...

The big question is what is JB up to?
If its all about team Astana then what Alberto did tactically is smart - gained time on all GC contenders. Now Astana - with LA & AC- have an envious gap on all the other's.

But it appears that he is not happy with todays move - which suggests that it is all about team Lance.
 
Jul 7, 2009
189
0
0
Dr. Maserati said:
+1...

The big question is what is JB up to?
If its all about team Astana then what Alberto did tactically is smart - gained time on all GC contenders. Now Astana - with LA & AC- have an envious gap on all the other's.

But it appears that he is not happy with todays move - which suggests that it is all about team Lance.

No it's about why make a move like that when it wasn't needed. Unless he rides off on all the contenders on Ventoux this effort really doesn't do anything.
 
May 13, 2009
692
1
0
Bala Verde said:
I am wondering, both Armstrong and Bruyneel admit that attacking wasn't the plan.

Contador attacked, and now, after the fact, we know it wasn't the plan

Why would first the other captain of the team as well as the DS admit that Contador's attack wasn't planned out, while the attack clearly improved AST position re other contenders. Contador put 20s on other contenders who didn't make up any time, while they were behind. On first sight, that looks like a victory to the team (assuming Contador didn't waste too much energy in the last 2k, so that it'll affect his performance over 3 weeks).

Bruyneel and Armstrong know a bit about PR and dealing with the press.

'Not planned, excellent outcome'. However, we did not know that the former.

Given the continuous reports about infighting, why wouldn't they want to defuse it and state that it had been the plan. In other words, why would they have stated that Contador did not act in accordance with supposed team tactics, while they could have used it to their advantage and spin the perception that everything was swell within the team...

Why not protect Contador, who is on your team as one of the team captains?

Because, I believe, JB plans (AST) is not to win the TDF with AC but with LA. And the only way they could do that is sandbagging AC, which is clearly what they tried to do today. If LA could have followed AC he would have done it (like he did with Heras in 2002) but he could not.

I don't buy the wind/tactic BS comments by LA, if AC would have attacked at the bottom he would have arrived with 1 30 - 2 min advantage. This is the same climb where Ulrich gained a minute or two on Pantani and Virenque during the tour 97 by attacking at the hard hairpin section at the bottom.

This tour is BS, AC is by far the strongest guy in the race but he would probably end up losing the race to LA due to internal team orders.
 

TRENDING THREADS