Funny but some truth to that. In msr especially why not try to make the race?One again underperformed in the big monuments because he is not a racer like Ballan, Sagan or Nibali
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Funny but some truth to that. In msr especially why not try to make the race?One again underperformed in the big monuments because he is not a racer like Ballan, Sagan or Nibali
That he wasted a lot of strength following Pog. I agree woth that. Also that he and MvdP were the only ones trying to win after Mohoric got away. Also that he knew Mohoric would attack this descent cause Roglic told him Mohoric has had Sanremo on his mind for years.What did he say to Sporza after the race?
Also that he and MvdP were the only ones trying to win after Mohoric got away.
Van der Poel said Pedersen was also chasing hard so I'm a bit surprised by WVA's comment. Basically every rider who had a shot at winning the sprint in that group worked to bring Mohoric back.Turgis.
Yeah, I guess Turgis raced to win but not in the way WVA and MVDP would have preferred. He rightly figured his best chance of winning was not to help the chase and hope he could catch the group off guard and attack and bridge the gap solo.Turgis.
Bling? He definitely had incentive to help and would have been the only other guy there who would want a sprintVan der Poel said Pedersen was also chasing hard so I'm a bit surprised by WVA's comment. Basically every rider who had a shot at winning the sprint in that group worked to bring Mohoric back.
Bling is Bling. If Wout expects him to work in that situation he hasn't watched cycling the past few years.Yeah, I guess Turgis raced to win but not in the way WVA and MVDP would have preferred. He rightly figured his best chance of winning was not to help the chase and hope he could catch the group off guard and attack and bridge the gap solo.
Bling? He definitely had incentive to help and would have been the only other guy there who would want a sprint
Lets be real Cancellara and Boonen have a single Sanremo between them. Sanremo isa different race from the cobbbles entirely.I think we all knew that Wout and Van Der Poel competing head to head would mean that neither would win as many classics as they would have without the other being present. That was obvious. What I’m now staring to realize is that by them marking each other so closely (and rightfully so- this is not a complaint), they will also open the door for others to win big races that would otherwise have gone to Wout or VdP.
Boonen won the Ronde in 2006 and Cancellara got 6th. One week later Cancellara won Roubaix and Boonen gotBoonen basically never beat a grat Cancellara to win de Ronde.
Turgis didn't try to win by co-operating. Turgis tried to win by not contributing anything until a quiet moment in the chase and then go at it alone.Turgis.
Cancellara had 1 top 10 in de Ronde before he won in 2010 and had won none of the Belgian cobbled races before E3 in 2010.Boonen won the Ronde in 2006 and Cancellara got 6th. One week later Cancellara won Roubaix and Boonen got5th2nd. Unfair to say Boonen never got the better of a great Cancellara in the Ronde. There's even something to say for the other way around. Boonen had to fight back from injuries quite a lot more, and that obviously cost him in a few Rondes.
Let's be real, Boonen and Cancellara by the age of 28 already had 6 Monuments and 1 WC combined, Van Aert and Van der Poel have 2 Monuments only and they're approaching that age. I'd say they're quite behind.Lets be real Cancellara and Boonen have a single Sanremo between them. Sanremo isa different race from the cobbbles entirely.
Also Boonen and Cance didnt have that many H2H duels in Vlaanderen and Roubaix. A chunk of their wins was when the other crashes out or were on low form. Boonen basically never beat a grat Cancellara to win de Ronde.
VdP has 4 participations in cobbled monuments and 3 podiums. Van Aert hit his prime like 2 years ago. In their collective best year Roubaix wasnt even held.Let's be real, Boonen and Cancellara by the age of 28 already had 6 Monuments and 1 WC combined, Van Aert and Van der Poel have 2 Monuments only and they're approaching that age. I'd say they're quite behind.
Lets be real Cancellara and Boonen have a single Sanremo between them. Sanremo isa different race from the cobbbles entirely.
Also Boonen and Cance didnt have that many H2H duels in Vlaanderen and Roubaix. A chunk of their wins was when the other crashes out or were on low form. Boonen basically never beat a grat Cancellara to win de Ronde.
The problem for Van Aert and Van der Poel is diluting their road career to date for mtb/cx and for Wout, he is essentially now a domestique for Roglic's GC ambitions and as we saw yesterday, him helping Wout was second priority to training on the cobbles to prepare for Le Tour anyway. Jumbo for some reason then sent Roglic on an attack rather than keep him to tip the balance to a sprint for Wout. Hopefully Roglic simply thought an attack would help Wout, but Wout didn't need a thinner group by then, he was already the best sprinter in the group as soon as Sagan had mechanical and Kwiato caught up behind the crash.
So Sagan and Kwiatkowski are better sprinters then Van Aert? In which year are you right now?The problem for Van Aert and Van der Poel is diluting their road career to date for mtb/cx and for Wout, he is essentially now a domestique for Roglic's GC ambitions and as we saw yesterday, him helping Wout was second priority to training on the cobbles to prepare for Le Tour anyway. Jumbo for some reason then sent Roglic on an attack rather than keep him to tip the balance to a sprint for Wout. Hopefully Roglic simply thought an attack would help Wout, but Wout didn't need a thinner group by then, he was already the best sprinter in the group as soon as Sagan had mechanical and Kwiato caught up behind the crash.
To be fair, WvA´s sprint seems to be slower than last year or two. And that saying, he´s never been top sprinter like Sagan definitely was, at least in Liquigas. I don´t know what Kwiato is doing there, though.So Sagan and Kwiatkowski are better sprinters then Van Aert? In which year are you right now?