Did anyone since the days of Bordeaux-Paris?He did in 2020.
Did Sagan won a sprint after 300km?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Did anyone since the days of Bordeaux-Paris?He did in 2020.
Did Sagan won a sprint after 300km?
Two of his WCH titles were won in the sprint after 260 km or so, and from there it´s pretty close to 300 km.He did in 2020.
Did Sagan won a sprint after 300km?
Its more about how hard the overall day was and how recent the last hard effort. Sagan has really underperformed in sprints a lot in Sanremo, Roubaix and RvV in cases when he was the only real sprinter in a group or had the best recent sprint pedigree.Two of his WCH titles were won in the sprint after 260 km or so, and from there it´s pretty close to 300 km.
Yes, I've said the same thing. In 2021, TA ruined his spring classics and in the fall Tour of Britain ruined his World Championship and Paris Roubaix. This spring, his maximum efforts to secure the win for Primoz in Paris Nice took the snap from his legs for MSR. If these guys truly want to win the Monuments, they need to skip the preceding stage races and just focus on the appropriate training/recovery.Has anybody noticed for Wout that he tends to underperform about a week after the end of a stage race? Even though he didn't try to tear this year's PN apart, he still had to show up every day and put in the miles, and he really had to put in massive efforts on the Sunday.
Without looking at previous results and going purely by memory, I can think of last year's worlds, and the races that followed last year's TA.
I'm curious what others have seen here, because if it's obvious to us, the fact that he and his team have not figured us out is strange.
MVDP and WVA have sprinted plenty of times (at least 10) head to head for the win (between CX and road) and MVDP has a big advantage. I will give you that Wout's clearly the more accomplished of the two when it comes to big bunch sprints.In 10 sprints against those guys he'll win more sprints then he loses.. He has beaten both Pogacar (sprint for Olympic medail) and Alaphilippe (MSR) and lost to MVP (RVV). So I think it's logical he goes for his biggest weapon.
Btw, it's not like he never attacks. He has won classic races ending solo like Omloop and Strade.
I'm not sure if you remember Tom Boonen correctly. I can hardly imagine any real attacks on final climbs like the Muur, Paterberg or Kwaremont... he usually just tried to follow to finish in the sprint.
tbh, I only remember his first RVV where he finished solo. The roubaix he won solo he dropped his team mate Terpstra, hardly a real attack.
PS I'm a Boonen fan to, there's nothing wrong with wanting to win a classic in a sprint!
As good as WvA his positioning is in bunch sprints and just before (and on) the crucial climbs, I hate to say I am often thinking he should just go 3-4 positions more to the back when he is in 2nd or 3rd position, wearing that hi-viz Belgian championship jersey. In MSR he countered allmost all Pogacar attacks, and in and after the descent, he was taking more than 50% of the initiative to chase Mohoric.
It seems he feels obliged (and others expect him) to do the burden of the work in those situations, and he dutifully does it but he'll not win in this way.
And the fact that Tadej, or MVDP or whoever finished in front of Wout after it was clear they were not sprinting for the win, who cares really?
I honestly think it's quite arrogant to sit up in a sprint for the top placings in a monument. As soon as he saw that he would be beaten by Mathieu, he just didn't try anymore and probably lost three placings. I don't get it, how hard is it to ride to the finish? If he had lost a cross race because he had been dropped by Mathieu, he wouldn't suddenly go to a nearby café and take a break.
I strongly disagree with the arrogance argument. If you´re Wout then you don´t care about other places like second, third and so on. At that very moment, I suppose he was just dissapointed that he couldn´t capitalize another chance as a huge favourite. That saying, it means he was probably emotional and kinda pissed so no wonder that he resigned to fight for other positions.I honestly think it's quite arrogant to sit up in a sprint for the top placings in a monument. As soon as he saw that he would be beaten by Mathieu, he just didn't try anymore and probably lost three placings. I don't get it, how hard is it to ride to the finish? If he had lost a cross race because he had been dropped by Mathieu, he wouldn't suddenly go to a nearby café and take a break.
It does matter a lot for my Sporza cyclingmanager team - competition!If not top 3 then what does it matter if you're 4th or 8th? I actually understand.
Easy. More monument or championship victories. Van Aert is a fantastic and unique rider in many ways. His versaility is tremendous. He can sprint, time trial, ride cobbles, attack in short hills and ride long mountains like no one else in modern cycling history. And his performances in many races are convincing. Both GC in one-week races, single stages in stage races, time trialing and the tier 2 one-day races like GW, Amstel and Omloop. But he hasn't won or even sprinted for victory in a monument (or worlds/olympics) since he was beaten by VdP in the Ronde in 2020.I really wonder what people in here actually expect from Wout...
I strongly disagree with the arrogance argument. If you´re Wout then you don´t care about other places like second, third and so on. At that very moment, I suppose he was just dissapointed that he couldn´t capitalize another chance as a huge favourite. That saying, it means he was probably emotional and kinda pissed so no wonder that he resigned to fight for other positions.
Easy. More monument or championship victories. Van Aert is a fantastic and unique rider in many ways. His versaility is tremendous. He can sprint, time trial, ride cobbles, attack in short hills and ride long mountains like no one else in modern cycling history. And his performances in many races are convincing. Both GC in one-week races, single stages in stage races, time trialing and the tier 2 one-day races like GW, Amstel and Omloop. But he hasn't won or even sprinted for victory in a monument (or worlds/olympics) since he was beaten by VdP in the Ronde in 2020.
That makes 6 of the biggest one day races without a win or sprinting for the win. Given his amazing level in so many other races, that is certainly a bit disappointing. Last year one could argue that he spent too much energy on competing in about every race he started, and that his hampered his performance in the very biggest races, but I can't see that this is the case this season. So unless something happens in the coming weeks, I certainly expect him winning or being real close to a victory in RVV and/or PR.
I'm glad Boonen didn't sprint for 2nd in the 2014 Roubaix, instead finishing last in the chase group. Then again, he had the palmarès to back such an attitude (and a teammate in front).I honestly think it's quite arrogant to sit up in a sprint for the top placings in a monument. As soon as he saw that he would be beaten by Mathieu, he just didn't try anymore and probably lost three placings. I don't get it, how hard is it to ride to the finish? If he had lost a cross race because he had been dropped by Mathieu, he wouldn't suddenly go to a nearby café and take a break.
in small sprints it's more about who has more energy left or who has the bigger acceleration.MVDP and WVA have sprinted plenty of times (at least 10) head to head for the win (between CX and road) and MVDP has a big advantage. I will give you that Wout's clearly the more accomplished of the two when it comes to big bunch sprints.
I'm glad Boonen didn't sprint for 2nd in the 2014 Roubaix, instead finishing last in the chase group. Then again, he had the palmarès to back such an attitude (and a teammate in front).
Because racing is about crossing the line first.Why on Earth were you glad about that? Just because Cancellara was collecting a huge amount of podium placings at the time and you needed an argument to support the notion that it wasn't impressive because real champions don't care about secondary placings?
Road cycling (one day races particularly) is all about winning and basically all the other positions aren't that meaningful. Cycling is I'd say quite unique on this matter among other sports and this confuses many people who come from other disciplines and sometimes wonder "why they don't fight for every single positions?! ". Fans' perspective is quite different than the riders' themselves, especially if you're a guy like WvA. If you'd ask him, he'd probably say there's no difference if he finishes 2nd or 10th in a race like this and I totally agree with that. Then of course the situation looks slightly different if you're let's say Turgis or even MvdP this year, where this was his first race this season, he wasn't the top favorite and he had something to prove for himself and by sprinting for 3rd gain confidence before the upcoming races. Van Aert had none of these motivations and I can't see anything what could triggered him in his mind to sprint for that 5th place.I honestly think it's quite arrogant to sit up in a sprint for the top placings in a monument. As soon as he saw that he would be beaten by Mathieu, he just didn't try anymore and probably lost three placings. I don't get it, how hard is it to ride to the finish? If he had lost a cross race because he had been dropped by Mathieu, he wouldn't suddenly go to a nearby café and take a break.
Road cycling (one day races particularly) is all about winning and basically all the other positions aren't that meaningful. Cycling is I'd say quite unique among other sports and this confuses many people who come from other disciplines and sometimes wonder "why they don't fight for every single positions?! ". Fans' perspective is quite different than the riders' themselves, especially if you're a guy like WvA. If you'd ask him, he'd probably say there's no difference if he finishes 2nd or 10th in a race like this and I totally agree with that. Then of course the situation looks slightly different if you're let's say Turgis or even MvdP this year, where this was his first race this season, he wasn't the top favorite and he had something to prove for himself and by sprinting for 3rd gain confidence before the upcoming races. Van Aert had none of these motivations and I can't see anything what could triggered him in his mind to sprint for that 5th place.
Van Aert sat up after he knew he was beat. So it was an 8th instead of a 5th place. That is nearly the same thing.How often do you see people not sprint for a monument podium? Apparently two times in a decade. It is arrogant to put yourself above that, and no, a 2nd and a 10th spot is not the same thing.
Your question should rather sound like "How often do you see people with the pedigree and ambitions of van Aert's not sprint for a monument podium", cause I think that's a key detail here.How often do you see people not sprint for a monument podium? Apparently two times in a decade. It is arrogant to put yourself above that, and no, a 2nd and a 10th spot is not the same thing.