Boonen and Cancellara were more intelligent riders than Van aert (Belgian Pozzato) and Matheiu VanderPol
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Boonen and Cancellara were more intelligent riders than Van aert (Belgian Pozzato) and Matheiu VanderPol
As crazy as the Spilak and Evenepoel comparison is, this is even worse.Boonen and Cancellara were more intelligent riders than Van aert (Belgian Pozzato) and Matheiu VanderPol
As crazy as the Spilak and Evenepoel comparison is, this is even worse.
Roglic was definitely dissapointing. If I was Van Aert i would be a bit annoyed. Roglic seems bad on +250km.Wout had to answer the four attacks by Tadej and it took the strength out for the sprint. It would have been ideal if either Roglic or Laporte had been around to do some of those chases. Jumbo Visma should look into this...no?
Van Aert is a Belgian Pozzato. Win Sanremo and some semi classics, primadonna, race defensively, not use his attack. Will never be world champion like BallanYup , Pozzato was close to a one trick pony while Van Aert is the most versatile rider of this generation capable of winning big classics, Tour sprints, TTs and mountain stage
Van Aert is a Belgian Pozzato. Win Sanremo and some semi classics, primadonna, race defensively, not use his attack. Will never be world champion like Ballan
You do know that @Ilmaestro99 is trolling, yes?I am not even a big Van Aert supporter (prefer MVDP) but let me remind you that he has 6 Tour stage wins and 4 silver medals in big Championships and that is without talking about his CX career.
Plus, Amstel and Strade are not semi-classics.
No.Wout had to answer the four attacks by Tadej and it took the strength out for the sprint. It would have been ideal if either Roglic or Laporte had been around to do some of those chases. Jumbo Visma should look into this...no?
Wout had to answer the four attacks by Tadej and it took the strength out for the sprint. It would have been ideal if either Roglic or Laporte had been around to do some of those chases. Jumbo Visma should look into this...no?
Spot on!Van Aert is a Belgian Pozzato. Win Sanremo and some semi classics, primadonna, race defensively, not use his attack. Will never be world champion like Ballan
Haven't they? Wasn't that a reason why he softpedalled those 2 stages during P-N?I'm curious what others have seen here, because if it's obvious to us, the fact that he and his team have not figured us out is strange.
Van Aert is a Belgian Pozzato. Win Sanremo and some semi classics, primadonna, race defensively, not use his attack. Will never be world champion like Ballan
You lack clarity when it comes to WVA.
Obviously WVA rides defensivly because his sprint is his main weapon. A second reason, that is just as important, is that he is one the tightest marked riders in the final together with MVP and Pogacar. Guys like Mohoric yesterday or Ballan in the WC just aren't as marked as the real big riders.
Pogacar en WVA both did a good ride. Poggy tried to get away, Wout tried to follow Pogacar. It ended up al coming together and if it comes together after the top of the pogio there's always an oudsider that wins like Mohoric, Stuyven, Ciolek, Demare.
Both points applied more so to Boonen (and to some degree Sagan), yet he took more initiative in the biggest races. Wout has the skill set to race offensively and to take more initiative, but he probably lacks a bit of explosivity. I think he's caught a bit between two positions, not quite cynical enough to race defensively and not desperate enough to race offensively. Then there's the whole self-image that is nearing the Spartacus mythos that basically begs others to lean on him.Obviously WVA rides defensivly because his sprint is his main weapon. A second reason, that is just as important, is that he is one the tightest marked riders in the final together with MVP and Pogacar.
His sprint capabilities seem better in stage races where he still has some team mates than attritional one day classics.
Also the likes of Pogacar, Alaphillipe and MvdP have pretty decent sprints but that doesn't stop them attacking in big races..
Both points applied more so to Boonen, yet he took more initiative in the biggest races. Wout has the skill set to race offensively and to take more initiative, but he probably lacks a bit of explosivity. I think he's caught a bit between two positions, not quite cynical/cunning enough to race defensively and not desperate enough to race offensively. Then there's the whole self-image that is nearing the Spartacus mythos that basically begs others to lean on him.
I'm talking from the perspective of sprinting after 300km. Did Van Aert win the sprint out of the group he was in?So Sagan and Kwiatkowski are better sprinters then Van Aert? In which year are you right now?
I disagree. They just had less opposition. I remember one of first times Boonen and Cancellara went clear together at RVV, it was frickin Karsten Kroon who was closests to them. With all due respect. But Karsten Kroon is no Kasper Asgreen, or Julian Alaphilippe, etc..Boonen and Cancellara were more intelligent riders than Van aert (Belgian Pozzato) and Matheiu VanderPol
He did in 2020.I'm talking from the perspective of sprinting after 300km. Did Van Aert win the sprint out of the group he was in?