Omloop Het Nieuwsblad 2014, 1 March, 198km, 1.HC

Page 27 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jan 4, 2011
6,229
241
17,880
trevim said:
95 out of 100 times he won't win riding like he did. Maybe that's why he doesn't have a lot of victories in his career despite his talent.

Why? He probably wouldn't have ridden the way he did if he knew he didn't have anything left for the sprint, don't you think?
 
Apr 17, 2013
6,494
431
18,580
... Van Avermaet once again showing that even though all the odds are in his favour, he has no idea how to win a bike race. Why did he take the first position with 500m to go???!:confused::confused:
 
Aug 16, 2013
7,620
2
0
Vino attacks everyone said:
Stannard is lucky. If he had lost, EBH would prpbably steal Thors hammer from Hushovd and smack him in his face :D

Stannard has everything under control, you saw it:p:D
 
Sep 8, 2009
15,306
3
22,485
do you think greg didn't choose the right gear to go for stannard or what happened?
he was blown away and he reached him too late
 
Jun 3, 2012
418
0
0
Buffalo Soldier said:
Crossed the line at 10km/h faster than Stannard. How is this possible...

Stannard started his sprint early to get the jump and was fading at the end. It was tactically very sharp, like when Gilbert jumped early at Paris-Tours 2009 to beat the superior sprinters Boonen and Bozic.
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,155
28,180
Whatever sprint GVA had earlier in his career is now gone but the strongest rider won today not the quickest. GVA simply should have stayed behind Stannard. Can't understand why he went to the front in the last km when the group behind was a safe distance away.
 
Oct 26, 2010
5,647
261
17,880
Flamin said:
Why? He probably wouldn't have ridden the way he did if he knew he didn't have anything left for the sprint, don't you think?
He pulled way too much. Obviously he has the strength but he's not known for his turn of speed. Van Avermaet is a bit of a loser though so Stannard probably add that up to his math :D
 
Jan 11, 2010
15,617
4,553
28,180
Lol, Greg Van Average... what a rider. Great win by Stannard.

The OPQS dominance is pretty non-existent. Terpstra almost saved the day for his team. It turns out BMC, Belkin, and Sky are all stronger collectively.
 
Oct 23, 2009
5,772
0
17,480
movingtarget said:
Whatever sprint GVA had earlier in his career is now gone but the strongest rider won today not the quickest. GVA simply should have stayed behind Stannard. Can't understand why he went to the front in the last km when the group behind was a safe distance away.
Stannard was the strongest? He got lucky by slipping away just as the group got together.

Vanmarcke was BY FAR the strongest, followed by Terpstra and EBH.
 
Apr 10, 2011
4,818
0
0
ianstannard said:
Was EBH sitting on Boom's and Terpstra's wheel all the time because he doesn't need to chase?

Yes.

There is no point chasing your own rider up the road ( most of the time :p )
 
Apr 12, 2009
2,364
0
0
TourOfTexas said:
Stannard started his sprint early to get the jump and was fading at the end. It was tactically very sharp, like when Gilbert jumped early at Paris-Tours 2009 to beat the superior sprinters Boonen and Bozic.
What I mean, how could a guy in it's 6th year as a pro let this happen as if he's an U23
 
Jan 27, 2012
15,231
2,623
28,180
Top 15:
1 Ian Stannard (Sky)
2 Greg van Avermaet (BMC)
3 Edvald Boasson Hagen (Sky)
4 Sep Vanmarcke (Belkin)
5 Niki Terpstra (Omega Pharma-Quick Step)
6 Jean-Pierre Drucker (Wanty)
7 Taylor Phinney (BMC)
8 Dries Devenyns (Giant-Shimano)
9 Egoitz Garcia (Cofidis)
10 Arnaud Démare (FDJ)
11 Luke Rowe (Sky)
12 Sebastian Langeveld (Garmin-Sharp)
13 Jurgen Roelandts (Lotto Belisol)
14 Stijn Vandenbergh (Omega Pharma-Quick Step)
15 Zico Waeytens (Topsport)


Not a bad ride by Egoitz.
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,155
28,180
maltiv said:
Stannard was the strongest? He got lucky by slipping away just as the group got together.

Vanmarcke was BY FAR the strongest, followed by Terpstra and EBH.

Strongest of the duo at the finish.