One thing I don't quite understand, how do Bennett and Kruijswijk get burned off on a 90km stage with 20km to go?
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
As much as I think crashes and mechanicals are part of cycling and waiting is silly - even as a Schleck fan, I wasn’t mad at Contador - you can hardly tell stories about this win to your grandchildren. He beat a weak field by taking advantage of a fallen rider when he wasn’t even the strongest rider. I don’t have an issue with not waiting as I said, but it is an important part of the story.
Whomever wins Tirreno Adriatico this week has a far more impressive week.
One thing I don't quite understand, how do Bennet and Kruijswijk get burned off on a 90km stage with 20km to go?
schachmann said in interview he had to make a big effort to get back, so what now?
Same thing happened in the Vuelta last October when there was a rain jacket incident which caused Roglic to breach a gap by himself.
Schachmann was 80 km out, no one deliberately pulled to drop him (until proven otherwise, that's just idle fantastical speculation) & the race was (as is always the case) chaotic at such a point until a breakaway group is formed.
Meanwhile when the yellow jersey falls & the peloton pulls to drop him... yeah, no comment required. To do so for a little warm-up race like Paris-Nice is also pretty "interesting" as well. Jumbo won't forget this one, neither will Roglic.
And we all know what happens when something bad happens to him, i.e. he comes back stronger. This will be no different.
The same as you.Not true. Quite a few dropped guys gave him a wheel. What race did you watch?
They should though, otherwise the circle will just continue.
Same thing happened in the Vuelta last October when there was a rain jacket incident which caused Roglic to breach a gap by himself.
Schachmann was 80 km out, no one deliberately pulled to drop him (until proven otherwise, that's just idle fantastical speculation) & the race was (as is always the case) chaotic at such a point until a breakaway group is formed.
Meanwhile when the yellow jersey falls & the peloton pulls to drop him... yeah, no comment required. To do so for a little warm-up race like Paris-Nice is also pretty "interesting" as well. Jumbo won't forget this one, neither will Roglic.
And we all know what happens when something bad happens to him, i.e. he comes back stronger. This will be no different.
The same as you.
yeah but now that you have written it,its no longer unwritten ruleMaybe the new unwritten rule is that you can only crash once, and the second time is free for all.
To me the real question is why did Roglic not have any team-mates left to help him? It seems to me some of Roglic's bad luck or the consequences can be attributed to not-so-great tactical stuff from Jumbo. The more I see, the more I'm not convinced by them. Also, Roglic did not have the strongest support here... because they try to give everyone of their amazing team their own chances these days. That's a good thing for the atmosphere in the team, but it can have consequences.
RaboFail. They have the whole team immediately with him, instead of leaving half of them up the road able to drop back later in the chase.One thing I don't quite understand, how do Bennett and Kruijswijk get burned off on a 90km stage with 20km to go?
Every time something like this happens I find myself amazed by how many fans assume sports should be played abiding by some sort of ethical code they believe in.
Every time something like this happens I find myself amazed by how many fans assume sports should be played abiding by some sort of ethical code they believe in.
Yeah, if it turned out that someone from Bora purposedly crashed Roglic the second time, then it's a different matter. Coz, honestly; not crashing your oponents on purpose should really be the only ethical code in cycling.
Nobody is obligated to give wins to rivals. However, sometimes riders do, when there has been an asgreement during the stage, which wasn't the case yesterday.
Nobody is obligated to wait for rivals. However, sometimes riders do, when the race is far from the finish, which wasn't the case today.
I truly hope crashing an opponent is forbidden by the written rules and you don't need an ethical code for that.Yeah, if it turned out that someone from Bora purposedly crashed Roglic the second time, then it's a different matter. Coz, honestly; not crashing your oponents on purpose should really be the only ethical code in cycling.
Yes, the reason is to favour the already dominant teams.Those unwritten rules existed for a reason
To me the real question is why did Roglic not have any team-mates left to help him? It seems to me some of Roglic's bad luck or the consequences can be attributed to not-so-great tactical stuff from Jumbo. The more I see, the more I'm not convinced by them. Also, Roglic did not have the strongest support here... because they try to give everyone of their amazing team their own chances these days. That's a good thing for the atmosphere in the team, but it can have consequences.
To me the real question is why did Roglic not have any team-mates left to help him? It seems to me some of Roglic's bad luck or the consequences can be attributed to not-so-great tactical stuff from Jumbo. The more I see, the more I'm not convinced by them. Also, Roglic did not have the strongest support here... because they try to give everyone of their amazing team their own chances these days. That's a good thing for the atmosphere in the team, but it can have consequences.
And yes, I know about Kuss, Harper, Bennett, Harper, Kruijswijk, Harper Vingegaard, Harper and Harper.
Honestly, is their team so amazing? Roglic and Van Aert, sure, but their depth is definitely more shallow than last year. They only have 27 riders and a lot of them are not somebody you would think could be a captain in their own right on another team like Ineos.
And yes, I know about Kuss, Harper, Bennett, Harper, Kruijswijk, Harper Vingegaard, Harper and Harper.