but then you would have van aert in P-N and potentially the exact same outcomeI just wish Roglic would have been in Tirreno with the rest of the big boys. It likely would have made both races better.
but then you would have van aert in P-N and potentially the exact same outcomeI just wish Roglic would have been in Tirreno with the rest of the big boys. It likely would have made both races better.
What's Roglic supposed to learn? Never underestimate Pogacar again? What else?My dislike of Roglic is nearing the dislike I had for peak Froome. Yeah its a sport, no gifts or mercy is to be expected, I get it. But there is something called good taste. It seems clear to me that he could have caught Mäder whenever he liked, but just toyed with everyone else. In two weeks he will have forgotten all about this minor victory, whereas Mäder would most likely treasure it for the rest of his life.
Emotions aside: While there is an argument that last year's Tour supposedly taught Roglic a lesson, I fail to see that lesson applied. He is riding the exact same way that lost him the Tour last year - temporiding by super-domestiques (which unlike SKY doesn't shed the peloton, but merely discourage attacking) and attacking 1½ km from the finish to gain 10-20 seconds. Lucky for him, he has no equal at this race. But against more serious competition he is only a midrange (not even long-range is necessary) attack by another S-tier rider from losing another Tour.
Nah.but then you would have van aert in P-N and potentially the exact same outcome
I just wish Roglic would have been in Tirreno with the rest of the big boys. It likely would have made both races even better.
Help you, wtf? Haven't you ever watch cycling race? You win a race if you have legs for it (also Tour), and not if you have blabla team and so on.
Ya, I remember Tiralongo helping Contador at Fuente De. I remember Win van Huffel, Garate and Ardila winning Savoldelli the Giro on the Finestre Sestriere stage.
It's good to have friends in the peleton on other teams. If it comes to the Tour and Pogacar has attacked Roglic and the Jumbo team have disappeared but Mader and Landa are there for Bahrain, I can't see them being too interested in helping Roglic if there's nothing in it for them on the day.
At least people won't complain next time that he won solely beause of some Mader from the other team helped him
I mean no matter what Roglic do or don't do there's always bunch of people complaining.
My dislike of Roglic is nearing the dislike I had for peak Froome. Yeah its a sport, no gifts or mercy is to be expected, I get it. But there is something called good taste. It seems clear to me that he could have caught Mäder whenever he liked, but just toyed with everyone else. In two weeks he will have forgotten all about this minor victory, whereas Mäder would most likely treasure it for the rest of his life.
Emotions aside: While there is an argument that last year's Tour supposedly taught Roglic a lesson, I fail to see that lesson applied. He is riding the exact same way that lost him the Tour last year - temporiding by super-domestiques (which unlike SKY doesn't shed the peloton, but merely discourage attacking) and attacking 1½ km from the finish to gain 10-20 seconds. Lucky for him, he has no equal at this race. But against more serious competition he is only a midrange (not even long-range is necessary) attack by another S-tier rider from losing another Tour.
On the other side, there was no deal between Roglic and Mader...It's useful to have allies, you never know when you might need them. Gifting Tiralongo that win at Macugnaga was very useful for Contador in the long run, for example. Valverde practically stopped to honour his deal with Sylwester Szmyd on Ventoux, because the deal was that if they had enough time for Valverde to get the jersey he'd give Szmyd the stage - and in the end his lead wasn't that big and it could have cost him on the Saint-François-Longchamp stage, but he would rather risk that than become known within the péloton as somebody who won't honour a deal. And I can't tell you anything about most of Jalabert's stage wins at the '95 Vuelta, but I can tell you all about the Bert Dietz stage.
True, but those guys aren't the level of what we've got at TA. It would have been fun to see him mixing it up for the win in all the stages we've seen already (except maybe stage 1).Well when the race started there was Porte and Gagenhart, etc. It's not as if there wasn't some class riders around, they just crashed out.
True, but those guys aren't the level of what we've got at TA. It would have been fun to see him mixing it up for the win in all the stages we've seen already (except maybe stage 1).
Agreed.I get no gifts, the team worked and so on, but that was an easy chance to gain favor with Bahrain. Who knows if their help could be useful when there would bigger things at play than a Paris-Nice stage win.
Some people complained for days that Movistar pulled for 30s on Covatilla even though they also had Mas to pull through. Guess what, they are the same people who complain today. You wouldn't see them complain if it was Schachmann at the end.At least people won't complain next time that he won solely beause of some Mader from the other team helped him
I mean no matter what Roglic do or don't do there's always bunch of people complaining.
Why, what did they do
I seriously doubt that Roglic knows the first thing about cycling's unwritten rules.Breaking the unwritten rules of cycling (or at least taking them rather lightly).
Maybe so. But then his rivals shouldn't wait for him if he has a puncture 10 kilometers from the finish line in the Tour de France.I seriously doubt that Roglic knows the first thing about cycling's unwritten rules.
Agreed. That shouldn't be a thing in any case.Maybe so. But then his rivals shouldn't wait for him if he has a puncture 10 kilometers from the finish line in the Tour de France.
I guess he didn't read the imaginary book where the rules are in!I seriously doubt that Roglic knows the first thing about cycling's unwritten rules.
He looks better than last year? He was 2nd in Algarve and won PN.Actually impressed by Schachmanns climbing level. He looked far better than last year and it's only his first race of the season. Even being the only one to go with one of those Roglsstomps for a while. His good base level helps him but I thought he might lose some time against the pure climbers like Vlasov, Hamilton or Martin.
Good to see him back at his best after the crash at Lombardia basically destroyed his goals last year.
Yes, but that didn't mean he had no objectives 5 months later, with all three GTs and many other races still to come.He looks better than last year? He was 2nd in Algarve and won PN.
I thought his climbing level today looked better than last years, yes. Wasn't talking results.He looks better than last year? He was 2nd in Algarve and won PN.