- May 5, 2010
- 51,687
- 30,234
- 28,180
For Vingegaard, I think Jumbo may overstate his recovery and high altitude components a bit in that it completely ignores how brutally strong he was on Plateau de Solaison in the Dauphine, as well as that he was already matching Pogacar on Planche de Belles Filles on low altitude. Secondly, when Vingegaard dropped Pogacar on the Ventoux, it was the 2nd week and Ventoux is moderate altitude. He got beaten on the Portet which is higher and 3rd week, and he got dropped on Tignes which is also 2000m+.
You're not on high altitude for a long time even during high altitude stages. And watts at while chill pacing in the peloton are not the same as watts on the final MTF going full throttle.Overstating it how?
It doesn't have to be a big difference to have an impact.
A 0,5 % advantage over a 5 hour effort, is still 1 minute 30 seconds.
That Vingegaard can follow Pogacar at lower altitude or in week 2, doesn't really tell us much, except that they are both world class climbers and very close to each other in terms of capability, .. it's just that Vingegaard generally has a small advantage week 3 and at high altitude... according to Jumbo.
![]()
Good thing no one crashed….
![]()
Good thing no one crashed….
and always following wheels only, to finish 10th in the endSchultz with his typical good last stage of a stage race, sadly always being an hour behind in GC.
