You and I both!Think last year was perfect for them... and Van Aert had bad luck, puncturing twice. Degenkolb crashed. Pedersen also had mechanicals.
Jasper had to change his bike once, but other than that they had a perfect race with few problems.
Big favorites but a lot can happen. I would like to believe so and that it will be an entertaining race, no matter who wins.
I share your interest in following Tarling and Milan today; either one or both of them seem capable of a really big day out today. That's just another of the many things I love about Roubaix; seemingly more than any other race it's the stories that play out within the race, victory or disaster alike, that are as interesting to me as who actually wins.Good Roubaix, everyone.
What a shame that Van Baarle won't start. My picks for today will then have to be Bettiol and Rex. The big beasts Tarling and Milan will also be interesting to follow.
Visma is that the same team so many have complained about their dominance?Visma-LAB reduced to breakaway fodder.
Seriously, you and I both on this one. I can't stand these two; reminds me WAAAAAAYYYYYYYY too much of the bad old days when they had their noses so far up 'someone who's ass shall not be named' they couldn't see straight. Going to hang with the Tiz feed for as long as it works today instead; D and D are a last resort.I'll have to listen to dumb and dumber, for the rest of this race. Ugh...
He has 81 wins, but ok.EBH finally going to live up to his potential!
Visma is that the same team so many have complained about their dominance?
This is sad...but true. I know they are a hated juggernaut, but that team really needs someone to get a good result today, for team morale.Visma-LAB reduced to breakaway fodder.
Yes, but there was a point where he was lauded as possibly becoming a dominant force in the peloton, so let's not go overboard here on his success.He has 81 wins, but ok.
...and I'm a fan...it was just a pithy statement, not meant to offend...save your ire for when I write something really snotty...He has 81 wins, but ok.
He has had a great career and was very much a big part of the Sky dominance in the Tour. One of the best domestics we have seen in the GTs. You dont see that on his palmares, you just had to watch it to know how good he was.Yes, but there was a point where he was lauded as possibly becoming a dominant force in the peloton, so let's not go overboard here on his success.
Now my memory lacks too, can't remember exact years, but happened plenty times before.I've seen this a few times, and its not been an issue. It seems like one time they just stayed low, and out of the way, and another, they actually stalled a little before entering. As I'm typing this, I can't remember the years, nor the racers though.
...but he never turned into Tom Boonen...and there was a point where he was hyped as thst being possible. Something I would have loved to see. But go ahead, take offense...He has had a great career and was very much a big part of the Sky dominance in the Tour. One of the best domestics we have seen in the GTs. You dont see that on his palmares, you just had to watch it to know how good he was.
He still got 81 wins of his own, as mentioned.
I appreciated the joke.Yes, but there was a point where he was lauded as possibly becoming a dominant force in the peloton, so let's not go overboard here on his success.