How much Jägermeister you need to drink to come to the conclusion of increasing safety by additional danger!?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Philipsen didn't.All the dudes who do Roubaix also did RVV and spent an equal amount of hard labour. I don't think it matters that much a week later, whether you did a 50km solo in front or slogged it out in the groups behind
They can do that 20 times in the parking at the left before the train tracksThe most radical solution would be to use the chicane between the train tracks and the cobbles, forcing the riders to an almost stand-still.
Favourite secteurs for me:
17. Hornain: The iconic views of the water towers at the beginning of the stretch, and the fact it's neverending.
I think it is possible that slowing for the chicane (they will be fighting hard before that to be in front) will be marginally safer than full throttle into a wet section of some of the worst cobbles. At the speeds they are now riding, full throttle into Arenberg is going to be insanely dangerous. In reality, there isn't a good way to minimize the danger of any of the sectors, except for taking them out. Yay everbody, lets do a Paris-Roubaix on tarmac only!!!??? I'm all for rider safety, but if it rains, the only way to ensure that is to stay on the porch.How much Jägermeister you need to drink to come to the conclusion of increasing safety by additional danger!?
Oliver is good this year, top10 at Flanders, also was visible at G-W and got 11th, 4th in Omloop. That's top-level results for him. He just doesn't attack anymore, hiding in the shadows, then striking in the sprintIt'll still be Naesen.
Is Lawrence in the shadow of his brother? Oliver was a fine rider, but I haven't seen much from him for a few years.
Old newsOliver is good this year, top10 at Flanders, also was visible at G-W and got 11th, 4th in Omloop. That's top-level results for him. He just doesn't attack anymore, hiding in the shadows, then striking in the sprint
And I would only trust a Belgian on this.Oliver was 4th in Omloop, 11th in GW and 7th in RVV last Sunday and one of the strongest in his group leading the chase. He should be excellent in Roubaix but it hasn't shown for several reasons. I feel he's more or less back where he lost it (in the corona years). The competition ofcourse has improved but he's still a solid cobbled-classics rider.
I had him twice in my list as I was thinking of separating sub-favourites from favourites (besides the one and only top favourite) and wasn't sure where to place Naesen and some other riders. Every year, you see one or several strong riders having an excellent race in PR, but it's hard to predict who will last the longest.
On behalf of myself, @armchairclimber and @AnotherArmChair, thank you for your supportIt mostly seemed to me, as an armchair fan,
There's a level crossing there! Can you imagine the fighting and pushing while waiting for the train to pass through, and then the maddest 50m sprint ever once they go up?The most radical solution would be to use the chicane between the train tracks and the cobbles, forcing the riders to an almost stand-still.
yes, I can. It's pretty much a cyclocross holeshotThere's a level crossing there! Can you imagine the fighting and pushing while waiting for the train to pass through, and then the maddest 50m sprint ever once they go up?
They should paint the TdF grid there.There's a level crossing there! Can you imagine the fighting and pushing while waiting for the train to pass through, and then the maddest 50m sprint ever once they go up?
There’s also usually agreement on shortening races in the rain and taking unnecessary climbs out of already hard mountain stages, neutralizing certain descents and of course making sure no Giro stages are over 200km.Sounds like there's at least some rider agreement on the chicane idea.
"I wrote to the riders, warning them that there would be greater braking before the Trouée," Gouvenou explained.
"They told me that they preferred to brake hard and risk falling on the tarmac rather than entering the Trouée at 60 km/h."
"The riders are a little on edge and are asking us for a little more security to enter the trouée, that doesn't seem illogical to us," Gouvenou said.
It’s a 180-rider peloton and you heard this “preference” from how many?Sounds like there's at least some rider agreement on the chicane idea.
"I wrote to the riders, warning them that there would be greater braking before the Trouée," Gouvenou explained.
"They told me that they preferred to brake hard and risk falling on the tarmac rather than entering the Trouée at 60 km/h."
"The riders are a little on edge and are asking us for a little more security to enter the trouée, that doesn't seem illogical to us," Gouvenou said.
Yep. I'm just passing along info, not saying I'm excited about it. I am interested in what it might do to the racing, as I think Volderke's points about the speed are good ones.There’s also usually agreement on shortening races in the rain and taking unnecessary climbs out of already hard mountain stages, neutralizing certain descents and of course making sure no Giro stages are over 200km.
"I" didn't hear anything. I quoted an article which I linked. Spoiler: Exactly to your point, they don't say, which is why I said "at least some".It’s a 180-rider peloton and you heard this “preference” from how many?
I'm from the South, porch.couch
So are they talking about some big soft obstructions to make for a thinner (but not much slower) peloton, or divert them off Av Michel Rondet onto one of the parallel roads (Rue de Croy or Rue Lambrecht)? (sorry, couldn't get the screenshot of Google maps to paste)