- Aug 4, 2009
- 286
- 0
- 0
In my opinion, nothing after the worlds should be taken seriously. It reminds me of people hunting down late season races to get a licence upgrade after everyone else has packed it in for the winter.
riobonito92 said:In my opinion, nothing after the worlds should be taken seriously. It reminds me of people hunting down late season races to get a licence upgrade after everyone else has packed it in for the winter.
AngusW said:Historically, there was no such thing as a monument or a semi-classic. All the one day races were known as classics. However, the eight original orthodox classics (back in Rik Van Looy's day anyway) were:
Milan - San Remo
Tour of Flanders
Paris - Roubaix
Fleche Wallonne
Liege Bastogne Liege
Paris - Brussels
Paris - Tours
Giro di Lombardia
The unorthodox classics (both now no longer run):
Bordeaux - Paris (run for part of the distance behind Derny pacers)
Grand Prix des Nations (described as the only classic to be run as a time trial)
Rik Van Looy is so far the only cyclist to win all the original orthodox classics.
But that's history. Things change. Paris Brussels was originally run during the spring, I believe, but disappeared during the late 60s and early 70s and reappeared as an Autumn classic and gradually lost its status. Fleche Wallonne was originally run on the same weekend as L-B-L as part of the "Weekend Ardennais"; there was a separate prize for the rider with the best combination of placings in both races. It got moved to a mid-week place in the calendar and so was not included in the World Cup competition of the 90s and early 2000s and its status also suffered.
Paris Tours is one of the oldest races on the calendar and despite several name changes during the 70s and 80s did actually make it onto the World Cup competition. For some, it is the sixth monument. But like I said, things change. 20 years from now, the list of monuments may be less or more than five, depending mostly on who "owns" them and their commercial viability.
I still think of Paris Tours as a classic race and despite being known as a sprinters' classic, it has produced some unexpected winners over the past 15 years. If it does end in a sprint this year, I hope that Cavendish wins it. If nothing else, it will make for a good rainbow jersey photograph.
Michielveedeebee said:Volk's a semi too... Imo you have the 5 Monuments, then you have Paris-Tours, Scheldeprijs, Fleche, Amstel, San Sebastian, Emilia and Piemonte or so as classics... I'm prolly forgetting some though...
EDIT: Libertine has put it quite well imo![]()
Michielveedeebee said:It is, just a boring one
El Pistolero said:It's never been part of any season long competition like the World Cup or World Tour and it's not viewed as prestigious even in Belgium.
It doesn't have anything special which makes it impossible to be called a classic. MSR has its Poggio and Cipressa(and used to have a great finish at the Via Roma), Ronde van Vlaanderen has cobbled hills(and used to have the Muur), LBL has famous hills like the Saint Nicholas and La Redoute(Roche aux Faucons will take some more time to get really famous), FW has an uphill finish at the famous Mur de Huy, Paris-Roubaix has famous cobbled sectors like Carrefour de l'Arbre and Lombardia has the Madonna del Ghisallo. All of them are longer than 200km and were at one point part of a season long cometition like the World Cup.
El Pistolero said:It's never been part of any season long competition like the World Cup or World Tour and it's not viewed as prestigious even in Belgium.
It doesn't have anything special which makes it impossible to be called a classic. MSR has its Poggio and Cipressa(and used to have a great finish at the Via Roma), Ronde van Vlaanderen has cobbled hills(and used to have the Muur), LBL has famous hills like the Saint Nicholas and La Redoute(Roche aux Faucons will take some more time to get really famous), FW has an uphill finish at the famous Mur de Huy, Paris-Roubaix has famous cobbled sectors like Carrefour de l'Arbre and Lombardia has the Madonna del Ghisallo. All of them are longer than 200km and were at one point part of a season long cometition like the World Cup.
WillemS said:I don't really care what distinctions are made, as long as a demoting UCI-status does not lead to the financial extermination of a race. I know what races I like, whether it has the label of monument, classic, semi-classic or even criterium. I'm a fan of spring and autumn one-day races, especially when there are obstacles involved (hills, cobbles) and preferably distance. A race shattered in groups with favorites or a, fantasy-like, hero that smashes the competition on an impossible course (Gilbert this year).
I don't care if a race is old, although I like the mythical stories and know that a race's mythical status attracts good riders like a neodymium magnet. I care about a good race. About the new stories that one day will turn into myths, as I am sure Gilbert's victories will if he has another few strong years (or even without the latter). I would love to be there as he claims the worlds on the Cauberg next year.
Great races are great races. Titles are just titles.
Armchair cyclist said:Well if the amount of excitement and anticipation on this board is anything to go by, this race is less noteworthy than pretty much anything on the WT and a lot mor eraces besides. Less than 24 hours before the start and we have had one anticipation, one enquiry about the date, and that is it in terms of looking forward to tomorrow.
auscyclefan94 said:Would like Gossy to get a win after him missing out at the Worlds though I think Cav will survive the climbs especially with his form at the moment.
Kvinto said:imo this time Cav doesn't have a team to control the race like it was at Worlds
CAVENDISH Mark, BAK Lars Ytting, DEGENKOLB John, EISEL Bernhard, GOSS Matthew Harley, RABON Frantisek, VELITS Martin
it doesn't equal one Wigging (not talking about Millar or Thomas). So it will be definitely a lot harder for him regardless of his really great form
Waterloo Sunrise said:I'm not sure what immense team is required - the climbs on that profile have a vertical climb of 40m and 20m respectively - it's almost embarassing to name them.
The hills are no doubt hard enough to make a selection especially after a long race. There is often plenty of crossinwds and you get some attacking racing as well right up to the finish. Riders can get away and stay away to the finish in this race.Waterloo Sunrise said:I'm not sure what immense team is required - the climbs on that profile have a vertical climb of 40m and 20m respectively - it's almost embarassing to name them.