I can imagine Peter riding tomorrow's stage in a jersey with the rainbow bands, yellow above it and green below it.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
HelloDolly said:Love this from Sagan
Sagan when asked how long he can keep yellow: "I don't care. If I don't have yellow, I have green. If I don't have green, I have rainbow"
Squirbos_19 said:I can imagine Peter riding tomorrow's stage in a jersey with the rainbow bands, yellow above it and green below it.
Ramon Koran said:If he continues like this only sky will be able to afford him. Imagine kwiatowski, sagan and moscon destroying the classics for years to come, what a sight that would be...
Not only that.Also singing Sagan you losing another three riders spots for (Baska,Kolar,J.Sagan).So no Sky :twisted:PremierAndrew said:Ramon Koran said:If he continues like this only sky will be able to afford him. Imagine kwiatowski, sagan and moscon destroying the classics for years to come, what a sight that would be...
Sky would have to get rid of a fair amount of Froome's domestiques before being able to afford Sagan. They're not budgetless, and when you're paying people like Thomas and Landa similar amounts to Cav's wages at DD, you run out of money very quickly
One year later and they are best friends(in front cameras).Oleg's best investment toy in his pro cycling adventure game. :razz:SeriousSam said:At last, Tinkoff capture the yellow jersey of the Tour de France.
Oleg was probably desperate to claim that coveted trophy. It is the most difficult jersey to get a hold of, takes an exceptional rider at the peak of his powers to do it. Well done to Sagan!
No doubt!KGB said:One year later and they are best friends(in front cameras).Oleg's best investment toy in his pro cycling adventure game. :razz:SeriousSam said:At last, Tinkoff capture the yellow jersey of the Tour de France.
Oleg was probably desperate to claim that coveted trophy. It is the most difficult jersey to get a hold of, takes an exceptional rider at the peak of his powers to do it. Well done to Sagan!
KGB said:One year later and they are best friends(in front cameras).Oleg's best investment toy in his pro cycling adventure game. :razz:SeriousSam said:At last, Tinkoff capture the yellow jersey of the Tour de France.
Oleg was probably desperate to claim that coveted trophy. It is the most difficult jersey to get a hold of, takes an exceptional rider at the peak of his powers to do it. Well done to Sagan!
Tonton said:Competitive at what? ITT for starters. He didn't prepare for months for his attempt, a la Wiggo, just showed up, and on a conventional bike, he's still with the best. Doing this in the fall after one of the greatest years ever recorded. Descending. He was every bit as good as the best descenders ever. I could go on and on.MacBAir said:To a point, yes. You can use them as a much more viable indication to compare cyclists from different eras than you can use number of wins in the sixties and seventies.Brullnux said:Seriously, MacBAir, do you really believe that you can take climbing data/average speeds and compare it with modern times?
It just confuses me that for some irrational reason, someone believes that Merckx would be competitive today. For starters, competitive at what?
About my previous posts go and watch the top 20 on MSR, Roubaix, LBL, Giro, Tour, Worlds during the older eras... Most of them are everywhere. And all of them are considered the best compared with recent riders by some of you.
Like I said, cycling was far from specialized and professional, compared to today.
If someone wants to answer, don't focus on grotesque exceptions to the rule.
I couldn't help but notice that you bring doping to the discussion. It's a no-no. Be aware .
There were many greats during Merckx tenure, legends of the monuments like Van Springel and De Vlaeminck, great GT riders, Poulidor of course, Gimondi, Van Impe, Zoetemelk, Agostinho, Ocana, Thevenet, et caetera.
And at the time, there were a lot of clubs, cycling was much more popular than it is today. The best athletes would not choose bogus sports like they do today, or sports that at the time were expensive like tennis for example. It was not as "pro", but the guys were much tougher. No weather protocol, no 3 km rule, when you see the whiners of today, how many of today's pros would have survived having to race 120 days per year, in all weather, not have Dave on the earpiece, therefore have to be smart, on roads that were nowhere in the shape they are today, on an 11 kg bike with no STI and only five cogs. If you compare eras, try to imagine today's guys back then. Interesting proposition. But pointless.
You don't know about those times, so why try to make a point, defend a position that's not holding water? Sorry but comparing Sagan to Merckx is a bit tough to swallow for those here who actually know about the sport . Respectfully, you're making a fool of yourself. Sorry
It doesn't take away the fact that Sagan has won two big races in his life and a lot of smaller ones. And his career is far from over. I'm a fan of his. He'll win more.
Where can I buy that shirt? I want itSeriousSam said:At last, Tinkoff capture the yellow jersey of the Tour de France.
Oleg was probably desperate to claim that coveted trophy. It is the most difficult jersey to get a hold of, takes an exceptional rider at the peak of his powers to do it. Well done to Sagan!
Do this and all the other stuff he has done in cycling then he pinches a girl's bottom… :Neutral:mr. tibbs said:HelloDolly said:Love this from Sagan
Sagan when asked how long he can keep yellow: "I don't care. If I don't have yellow, I have green. If I don't have green, I have rainbow"
Let's hope he shows all three at once:
Squirbos_19 said:I can imagine Peter riding tomorrow's stage in a jersey with the rainbow bands, yellow above it and green below it.
If there's any cyclist the ASO/UCI would allow to do this, surely it's Sagan. (Aka, The Peloton's Official Mascot)
sienna said:Do this and all the other stuff he has done in cycling then he pinches a girl's bottom… :Neutral:
Neither dude. There's people who'd have him drummed out of the sport…not me.Pippo_San said:sienna said:Do this and all the other stuff he has done in cycling then he pinches a girl's bottom… :Neutral:
My guess is that he would be similar to PS. No way he would win a GT. But comparing generations is difficult at best. Who knows how EM would develop himself in the 2000s.saunaking said:Tonton said:Competitive at what? ITT for starters. He didn't prepare for months for his attempt, a la Wiggo, just showed up, and on a conventional bike, he's still with the best. Doing this in the fall after one of the greatest years ever recorded. Descending. He was every bit as good as the best descenders ever. I could go on and on.MacBAir said:To a point, yes. You can use them as a much more viable indication to compare cyclists from different eras than you can use number of wins in the sixties and seventies.Brullnux said:Seriously, MacBAir, do you really believe that you can take climbing data/average speeds and compare it with modern times?
It just confuses me that for some irrational reason, someone believes that Merckx would be competitive today. For starters, competitive at what?
About my previous posts go and watch the top 20 on MSR, Roubaix, LBL, Giro, Tour, Worlds during the older eras... Most of them are everywhere. And all of them are considered the best compared with recent riders by some of you.
Like I said, cycling was far from specialized and professional, compared to today.
If someone wants to answer, don't focus on grotesque exceptions to the rule.
I couldn't help but notice that you bring doping to the discussion. It's a no-no. Be aware .
There were many greats during Merckx tenure, legends of the monuments like Van Springel and De Vlaeminck, great GT riders, Poulidor of course, Gimondi, Van Impe, Zoetemelk, Agostinho, Ocana, Thevenet, et caetera.
And at the time, there were a lot of clubs, cycling was much more popular than it is today. The best athletes would not choose bogus sports like they do today, or sports that at the time were expensive like tennis for example. It was not as "pro", but the guys were much tougher. No weather protocol, no 3 km rule, when you see the whiners of today, how many of today's pros would have survived having to race 120 days per year, in all weather, not have Dave on the earpiece, therefore have to be smart, on roads that were nowhere in the shape they are today, on an 11 kg bike with no STI and only five cogs. If you compare eras, try to imagine today's guys back then. Interesting proposition. But pointless.
You don't know about those times, so why try to make a point, defend a position that's not holding water? Sorry but comparing Sagan to Merckx is a bit tough to swallow for those here who actually know about the sport . Respectfully, you're making a fool of yourself. Sorry
It doesn't take away the fact that Sagan has won two big races in his life and a lot of smaller ones. And his career is far from over. I'm a fan of his. He'll win more.
Just curious. If Merckx was born in say 1993 or so do you think he would be a better version of Sagan or a freak winning classics and GTs every year?
jmdirt said:PS not too happy with his platoon mates:
http://velonews.competitor.com/2016/07/tour-de-france/scathing-sagan-blasts-brainless-peloton_412691
Merckx's apparent abilities were inflated by the low quality of his opposition.Ramon Koran said:As good as Sagan is comparing him to merckx is ludicrous. People say merckx would be to heavy to climb with the best in the modern peleton are misinformed. If you compare his ventoux ascent time in 70 it's not much slower than today despite all the technology evolution. Sure Sagan is a great talent but he's comparable to the likes of kelly, valverde or Jalabert talent wise, not merckx.