• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Philippe Gilbert Discussion Thread

Page 18 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re: Re:

shalgo said:
shalgo said:
Amazingly—especially considering how good Quickstep has been this year—this injury means that Gilbert will not get a victory this year. The last time he didn’t get a win in a season was 2002, when he was only a trainee in the autumn.
Well, Gilbert managed to get a win in his first race back from injury and thus keep his 16-year streak of getting at least one win per season alive.

Such an impressive comeback. Great rider.
 
His palmares is just insane.

The Olympics, MSR, GW and E3 are the only major one-day races he hasn't won.

Checks at Worlds, RVV, PR, LBL, Lombardia, Strade, Omloop, Amstel, Flèche, San Sebastián and Paris-Tours.

Plus he has won De Brabantse Pijl, Québec and Belgian Championships (RR and ITT).

Stages in all Grand Tours as well.
 
Re: Re:

Valv.Piti said:
Asero831 said:
Did he surpass Tom Boonen's one day palmares already?
In my opinion, yes. Consistency means something - Ardennes triple, Roubaix, Flanders, Lombardia, Strade Bianche, San Sebastian etc.

Insane ride today. Chapeau!

There’s no question. Gilbert’s one day palmares are now clearly better than those of both Boonen and Cancellara. The only one who is still in the argument with him in the modern sport is Bettini.

You have to go back to the era of the Titans, before mortal men pedaled this earth, to find riders with clearly better one day palmares, Kelly, De Vlaeminck etc.
 
Re:

Red Rick said:
Congrats to the old man. Was very surprised to hear it's only the 3rd time he's started this race.

Unfortunately for him the best time to win Sanremo was 8 years ago.

Side note, it's kinda shocking to me Sean Kelly was never a WC :eek:

I have been thinking the same this past week. Also that he never won Flanders. You'd think that 49 out of 50 times, a rider of his skillset in that time period would be WC at least once.
 
Re: Re:

tobydawq said:
Red Rick said:
Congrats to the old man. Was very surprised to hear it's only the 3rd time he's started this race.

Unfortunately for him the best time to win Sanremo was 8 years ago.

Side note, it's kinda shocking to me Sean Kelly was never a WC :eek:

I have been thinking the same this past week. Also that he never won Flanders. You'd think that 49 out of 50 times, a rider of his skillset in that time period would be WC at least once.

He was always at a disadvantage in the WCRR because of its wildly unfair team structure. Of course the same could be said of Sagan and Roche won a WC when covering a move for Kelly, so that wasn’t an insurmountable disadvantage, but the Ronde is a more surprising gap in his palmares. He was the perfect rider for the Ronde and he would have swapped two of his other Monuments for one Ronde.
 
Re: Re:

tobydawq said:
Red Rick said:
Congrats to the old man. Was very surprised to hear it's only the 3rd time he's started this race.

Unfortunately for him the best time to win Sanremo was 8 years ago.

Side note, it's kinda shocking to me Sean Kelly was never a WC :eek:

I have been thinking the same this past week. Also that he never won Flanders. You'd think that 49 out of 50 times, a rider of his skillset in that time period would be WC at least once.
Worlds are a fickle thing. I'm sure being Irish didn't help
 
The comparison with one day racers such as Boonen, Cancellara and Bettini is quite interesting, especially the one with Boonen as I feel they stand on completely different ends of the spectrum of classics specialists. Boonen with the excption of his worlds triumph has only ever really won cobbles classics and although these races are among the most prestigious ones and he has been quite dominant and won even more big races than Gilbert has, it doesn't really come as a surprise that a rider is dominant in a "discipline" if all the races in that discipline are very similar. Gilbert never felt like the classics force, Boonen has been as he has never been dominant (with the big exception of 2011) yet the spectrum of races he has won is absolutely unheard of in todays era. After today I'd probably put him on the top spot of 21st century classics specialists, but it's close. Just one more big win would make it quite clear though.
 
Gigs_98 said:
The comparison with one day racers such as Boonen, Cancellara and Bettini is quite interesting, especially the one with Boonen as I feel they stand on completely different ends of the spectrum of classics specialists. Boonen with the excption of his worlds triumph has only ever really won cobbles classics and although these races are among the most prestigious ones and he has been quite dominant and won even more big races than Gilbert has, it doesn't really come as a surprise that a rider is dominant in a "discipline" if all the races in that discipline are very similar. Gilbert never felt like the classics force, Boonen has been as he has never been dominant (with the big exception of 2011) yet the spectrum of races he has won is absolutely unheard of in todays era. After today I'd probably put him on the top spot of 21st century classics specialists, but it's close. Just one more big win would make it quite clear though.
No way, Gilbert is right in the middle of the Classic spectrum of modern greats. Boonen on one end, Valverde on the other. Gilbert sits in that perfect niche where he can win them all (except probably current Lombardia) in the right circumstances.

And he's also played it smartly. Took on Lombardia when it suited him, then switched his focus fully on the cobbles only after joining by far the strongest cobbled team.
 
Re:

Red Rick said:
I guess a lot depends on how you rate certain races/distributions. For me Bettini is still clearly ahead

How?

I can see that there’s an argument, but I can only understand putting Bettini “clearly” ahead if you think that the Olympic RR is more important than the Monuments. And anyone who thinks that hates cycling and is operating on the assumption that it’s a trivial sport with no fan base or traditions of its own.
 

TRENDING THREADS