- Apr 20, 2012
- 6,320
- 0
- 0
I know your point stands, Armstrong also labelled dottore Ferrari as 'a good man'.LaFlorecita said:Well. I don't know.
Anyway my point still stands.
Just saying.
I know your point stands, Armstrong also labelled dottore Ferrari as 'a good man'.LaFlorecita said:Well. I don't know.
Anyway my point still stands.
will10 said:Everyone is in CYA mode Flo. AC is no exception.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:I know your point stands, Armstrong also labelled dottore Ferrari as 'a good man'.
Just saying.
why don't you get out of your world of hatred and read some articles on the internet. Maybe you can find out why they are so close![]()
LaFlorecita said:why don't you get out of your world of hatred and read some articles on the internet. Maybe you can find out why they are so close![]()
Now you are being silly.LaFlorecita said:This is for you as well
except maybe the first part because you haven't shown intense, irrational hatred towards Alberto
airstream said:Like probably all people on this forum section, I don't believe in official version from Contador and Saiz.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:Now you are being silly.
Manolo Saiz is responsible for one of the most sophisticated doping networks of all times. Poisoning young men, poisoning the noble sport cycling is. With the money of blind people. He is a cancer to cycling, turning sprinters into Grand Tour winners. And, do note the number of his former team docs still active in cycling.
No, tell me, should Contador be on his defence?
And, please stop labelling people as haters who genuinely have good reasons to doubt as why Alberto should be on Saiz's defence.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:Now you are being silly.
Manolo Saiz is responsible for one of the most sophisticated doping networks of all times. Poisoning young men, poisoning the noble sport cycling is. With the money of blind people. He is a cancer to cycling, turning sprinters into Grand Tour winners. And, do note the number of his former team docs still active in cycling.
No, tell me, should Contador be on his defence?
Smell the coffee la Florecita.
And, please stop labelling people as haters who genuinely have good reasons to doubt as why Alberto should be on Saiz's defence.
coinneach said:Hmmm....I think Contador is a bit more 3 dimensional than some posts would have him be.
He is very loyal (as are Spanish cyclist as a whole, compared to others)
He COULD make a very good witness...to most people in Spain he is among the top 3 sporting idols (despite his doping ban). He really believes his own lies and can convince others.
But that's surely the problem...it COULD turn out to be his "Oprah moment", if the prosecutor is any good at phrasing questions to establish the quality of his evidence.
I think he'll think better of it, now he can't give evidence by video link.
coinneach said:Hmmm....I think Contador is a bit more 3 dimensional than some posts would have him be.
He is very loyal (as are Spanish cyclist as a whole, compared to others)
He COULD make a very good witness...to most people in Spain he is among the top 3 sporting idols (despite his doping ban). He really believes his own lies and can convince others.
But that's surely the problem...it COULD turn out to be his "Oprah moment", if the prosecutor is any good at phrasing questions to establish the quality of his evidence.
I think he'll think better of it, now he can't give evidence by video link.
LaFlorecita said:So what's your theory? That they're actually not close at all?
Vino is just one of many lucky guys. There were about 100-120 guys, however only 25-30 names were revealed. So God knows why Gazzetta decided to write about Cipollini, apparently having much evidence on different non-spanish cyclists.Gregga said:Gregga]By the way, where is Vino in Fuentes' files ?
According to Hamilton he was a client (he saw him in a café near Fuentes office), he was supposed to share the expensive 'Siberia' fridge with Basso, Hamilton and Ullrich... But Vino doesn't appear anywhere neither is his nickname revealed.
airstream said:My theory is that Contador's disclosure will be accompanied with no lesser curses than Armstrong's one. Yes, I won't argue just because it can't be effective.
airstream said:Vino is just one of many lucky guys. There were about 100-120 guys, however only 25-30 names were revealed.
Yes, very likely.Gregga said:Sure, but the top cyclists (+the runner Marta Dominiguez) had clearly their blood bags in the main freezer and a nickname. Vino isn't identified among them. Maybe he was one of the unidentified nicknames : Rosa or Goku ?
airstream said:So God knows why Gazzetta decided to write about Cipollini, apparently having much evidence on different non-spanish cyclists.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:Now you are being silly.
Manolo Saiz is responsible for one of the most sophisticated doping networks of all times. Poisoning young men, poisoning the noble sport cycling is. With the money of blind people. He is a cancer to cycling, turning sprinters into Grand Tour winners. And, do note the number of his former team docs still active in cycling.
No, tell me, should Contador be on his defence?
Smell the coffee la Florecita.
And, please stop labelling people as haters who genuinely have good reasons to doubt as why Alberto should be on Saiz's defence.
I think you meant what's convenient for him, right?LaFlorecita said:Yes, if he [Contador] thinks that's the right thing to do.
hrotha said:Nozal and Beloki.![]()
cineteq said:I think you meant what's convenient for him, right?
Beloki accuses the UCI for putting his health at risk during the Tour as he almost fainted when they [vampires] sucked his blood.hrotha said:Nozal and Beloki.![]()
Descender said:The Dr that certified Manzano had health problems related to his doping, and who was going to testify as a witness tomorrow, has just died of a heart attack.
http://ciclismo.as.com/ciclismo/2013/02/12/mas_ciclismo/1360676360_075577.html