Power Data Estimates for the climbing stages

Page 153 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
PhiLiz

PhiLiz

BANNED
Sep 8, 2015
436
364
9,980
Red Rick said:
Record was only 1615 VAM, which is a lower record VAM than the comparable Turini record which Roglic broke on a 10 minute longer climb while doing all sorts of tactical bs.

I'll wait for the actual climbing time to drop
Click to expand...
EDIT - 26:24 by the looks of it. 1997 was 28:56 but on a far harder stage indeed.
 
Last edited:
roundabout

roundabout

Jun 7, 2010
19,196
3,092
28,180
Seems like wonky data as Thomas lost 3 minutes approximately not 4 and they were together at the start of the climb

Fastest time after 1994/1996 and Armstrong in 2000 either way
 
Devil's Elbow

Devil's Elbow

Sep 20, 2017
12,424
23,488
28,180
So about 20 seconds down on Armstrong and about 40 seconds up on Piepoli who subsequently tested positive on CERA. That would be extremely suspect midway through the Tour on a stage without anything happening before the MTF...
 
PhiLiz

PhiLiz

BANNED
Sep 8, 2015
436
364
9,980
The Armstrong time is not a good comparison, it was an absolutely miserable day. He probably could've gone much faster under different conditions, he destroyed everyone on that day.

SD in 2008 and Nibali in 2014, on the other hand, are.
 
Red Rick

Red Rick

Feb 20, 2012
53,939
44,325
28,180
Devil's Elbow said:
So about 20 seconds down on Armstrong and about 40 seconds up on Piepoli who subsequently tested positive on CERA. That would be extremely suspect midway through the Tour on a stage without anything happening before the MTF...
Click to expand...
It's basically what I would've expected on Alpe d'Huez, to go 40 to 60s faster than the fastest recent times.

This may be a hot take but I think effect of fatigue and previous efforts may be a bit overrated in the freshest riders in a race.
 
roundabout

roundabout

Jun 7, 2010
19,196
3,092
28,180
Red Rick said:
It's basically what I would've expected on Alpe d'Huez, to go 40 to 60s faster than the fastest recent times.

This may be a hot take but I think effect of fatigue and previous efforts may be a bit overrated in the freshest riders in a race.
Click to expand...

<You don't say meme goes here>

And what is your best guess for why it may be so?
 
Red Rick

Red Rick

Feb 20, 2012
53,939
44,325
28,180
roundabout said:
<You don't say meme goes here>

And what is your best guess for why it may be so?
Click to expand...
Physiologically? I think it's partially down to substrate usage and that's actually an area where science and nutrition has improved a lot over the years. Also building up less lactate on 6W/kg for 20 minutes should help a lot.

I just think it's fairly common to see near top climbing performances after a hard day by the best in a race, and it's generally those behind that go much slower. And some of the biggest gaps on near unipuerto stages have happened on stages where they drill a shorter, easier climb super hard before, like Ancares 2014.
 
roundabout

roundabout

Jun 7, 2010
19,196
3,092
28,180
Red Rick said:
Physiologically? I think it's partially down to substrate usage and that's actually an area where science and nutrition has improved a lot over the years. Also building up less lactate on 6W/kg for 20 minutes should help a lot.

I just think it's fairly common to see near top climbing performances after a hard day by the best in a race, and it's generally those behind that go much slower. And some of the biggest gaps on near unipuerto stages have happened on stages where they drill a shorter, easier climb super hard before, like Ancares 2014.
Click to expand...

Ok, but is science and nutrition advance limited to 2/3 teams? The margin of Vingegaard's superiority over the rest was significant today.

Very significant.
 
R

Riek s

Jun 24, 2010
1,679
1,997
13,680
If you look at some of those attacks from Froome, there is nothing natural about it... Honestly, for me Froome is the prove that Cycling body doesn't really want to catch dopers. and if they catch them, its more by accident because they tried to make it appear as if they do something.
 
zlev11

zlev11

BANNED
Jan 23, 2011
2,734
3,146
17,180
roundabout said:
And Thomas riding on the team that dominated that race lost 3 minutes on the last climb today.

That's a lot of gains. And not against some hillbilly anti-science French team.
Click to expand...

what's your point then? Thomas is also 7 years older now than he was then. Froome had the same gap to the field back then as Vingegaard did today. it happens when the strongest rider in the race goes full gas. Pogacar put 4 minutes into everyone on one stage last year too.
 
Mayomaniac

Mayomaniac

Apr 10, 2019
12,081
16,002
23,180
Riek s said:
If you look at some of those attacks from Froome, there is nothing natural about it... Honestly, for me Froome is the prove that Cycling body doesn't really want to catch dopers. and if they catch them, its more by accident because they tried to make it appear as if they do something.
Click to expand...
You know, the fact that the official Covid tests by ASO on the rest days have been total bs (no positive tests and yet one or 2 days after a few riders always test positive on the internal test) made me think. Are they really gonna be more serious with other forms of "testing" that can have much more negative consequences for the sport (and ASO), or will they also just look away?
 
Mayomaniac

Mayomaniac

Apr 10, 2019
12,081
16,002
23,180
PhiLiz said:
The Armstrong time is not a good comparison, it was an absolutely miserable day. He probably could've gone much faster under different conditions, he destroyed everyone on that day.

SD in 2008 and Nibali in 2014, on the other hand, are.
Click to expand...
Nibali went solo with what, over 10kms to go? He probably could have gone a lot faster with Kuss and Wout working for him...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lui98
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom