Bonimenier
BANNED
You should do better research before making false statements.you remember that not a single team was interested in Asgreen and QS just gave him a chance bc they really needed another rider?
Last edited:
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
You should do better research before making false statements.you remember that not a single team was interested in Asgreen and QS just gave him a chance bc they really needed another rider?
Well, frankly, you can never be too suspicious when it comes to Patrick's wolf cubs... It's just way too obvious and happens way too often to go unnoticed.They signed Asgreen when he was 21, and he had already proven that he was good TT'er among some other things.
They signed Sénéchal when he was 23, and he already had some decent results in the classics before that.
If a rider is dominant at a young age, you're suspicious of them. If a rider gets better when they get a bit older, you're suspicious. Stop being ridiculous.
Sure, but that doesn't make what FCance said any less bullcrap.Well, frankly, you can never be too suspicious when it comes to Patrick's wolf cubs... It's just way too obvious and happens way too often to go unnoticed.
This post doesn't help your "cause" at all. I think you know cycling better than this. But yes.... The whole lefevere system is suspiciousThis is so ridiculous. Senechal was an average domestique when they signed him, Asgreen an absolute nobody. Then this guy is going solo for 40km giving everything and still fresh enough to attack again for the win? Team didn't start as strong as expected last month, but now they definitely upped their game again.
I suppose that is how every team would/should do it, if possible.Okay, conspiracy theory, but do you think it's possible that QS dope their riders without their knowledge, or at least, that the riders do not know what exactly they are getting?
So all those riders denying doping are telling the truth. This is good. Keep it coming.I suppose that is how every team would/should do it, if possible.
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that's probably how you would want to do it, if possible.So all those riders denying doping are telling the truth. This is good. Keep it coming.
Not possible and not legal. But it's an interesting thought.That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that's probably how you would want to do it, if possible.
Okay, conspiracy theory, but do you think it's possible that QS dope their riders without their knowledge, or at least, that the riders do not know what exactly they are getting?
Seems unlikely. I can imagine that most riders are very careful with whatever medicines, food, drinks they take and really want to know what's what before taking it.
There are numerous good examples, but I don't think Terpstra is the greatest one. The guy really has known a lot of bad luck with hard crashes since he left Quickstep.terpstra and viviani are prime examples of guys who made a name for themselves, left for a bigger contract and then mysteriously ehm ehm "couldnt find their previous form" , but then you have guys like cancellara or cavendish who left and became leaders
that being said i fully expect bob jungels to never do anything for like 2 years over at ag2r
But also not like it never happened before in sports.Not possible and not legal. But it's an interesting thought.