Re: Re:
Lol, pretty obvious baiting.
gazr99 said:red_flanders said:gazr99 said:Poursuivant said:bigcog said:http://www.chronoswatts.com/watts/19/
Alpe D'huez
37 Nairo Quintana Colombie Tour de France 2013 (#18) 39'50 6.25 w/kg 426
Why hasn't this ET performance been mentioned ? lol
Wait, wait, wait: Quintana put out more w/kg, in the third week of his tour in 2013, than Froome did on his 'mutant' stage 10 this year,the one that broke the internet, Even Froomes biggest estimates was 6.09 w/kg, and that was the first mountain stage of the tour, and it was after a rest day! That is brilliant![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
He's never been in the yellow jersey, makes a big difference to the level of scrutiny.
Bingo. While he has won a GT, has he made one boring through domination? Has his team declared him clean and smarter than everyone about training in the english-speaking media? Has he repeatedly insulted the intelligence of cycling fans? Does he have legions of fans defending his cleanliness despite all evidence to the contrary?
Nope. Pretty much everyone who understands the sport assumes him to be as doped as everyone else. Not terribly controversial, so not much chatter.
Well he did win the Giro.
He has much evidence as critics have on Froome, some estimates on w/kg he produces, almost beating Froome & Sky in his first tour at 23, people not sure what he does or if he is tested in Colombia, then you mix it all together to have little evidence but if you believe in your theory long enough, you will find a way to make it work. Some people just have a gut feeling on who's doping and who isn't
Lol, pretty obvious baiting.