- Feb 16, 2010
- 15,382
- 6,077
- 28,180
She finished today behind 4-5 American riders that she beat in nearly every race this season. Carrier skipped one of the races last weekend she had been slated to start and was poor in the other. It happens sometimes.Some of those races had fairly weak fields, but this performance is of course far from her actual level.
Why is he not jumping the jumps?
To honour Lars van der Haar in his last WC?
Del Grosso just looks smoother than Nys, he never looks like he's trying to go fast. Nys on the other hand always looks like he's in a hurry to get to his next crash.8th world title for Van der Poel, now he is the undisputed CX GOAT.
Very interesting fight for second, Del Grosso suffered but then in the last lap Nys made another mistake in the steep climb and Del Grosso got a gap to finish second in his debut elite WC.
Great race from Fontana finishing fifth beaten on the line by Niewenhuis for fourth.
Sven Nys was saying live on tv that Thibau was planning to change tires in the final lap. Obviously didn't do it.Some saying that Nys wasn't on mud tires so the rain in the last two laps derailed him a little bit.
It's really clear how Del Grosso always keeps a huge gap when he's following Nys, whereas Nys is safe to ride on Del Grosso's wheel because the latter hardly makes any mistakes. Which in a way is an advantage for Nys.Del Grosso just looks smoother than Nys, he never looks like he's trying to go fast. Nys on the other hand always looks like he's in a hurry to get to his next crash.
Yep, he's lighter than Nys and Vdp, too so he's great on steep stuff. Nys makes way too many mistakes. Del Grosso looked like he was done but nys let him back in.Sven Nys was saying live on tv that Thibau was planning to change tires in the final lap. Obviously didn't do it.
But what won Tibor the silver medal was the fact that he was the best on that climb, he's been the best on it all weekend. Even better than Mathieu.
From a neophyte's perspective, I thought the course (from a viewing perspective) was pretty one-dimensional. The things that are often the difference makers on many courses--longer running sections, actual climbing (I'm not including humping up those two ramps), off-camber sidehills, sand. Not that any of these would change the overall winner in the elite races. Of course, other cross World's courses have dominated by one element (e.g., sand), and road World's can also be one-dimensional.That was clearly the best race so far. Won by a 16-year-old.
Hopefully the course won't dry out too much before the men's race. This is what this course needs: a bit of mud, a bit of sliding in each corner, the descents a bit more tricky. Then it becomes a really great course.
Del Grosso is definitively heavier than Nys, an probably than MvdP too. He is about the same size as WVA. What made the two Dutch better on that climb was more seated power.Yep, he's lighter than Nys and Vdp, too so he's great on steep stuff. Nys makes way too many mistakes. Del Grosso looked like he was done but nys let him back in.
I don't think online sources for this are to be entirely trusted, but I found Nys at 64kg, del Grosso at 70kg, and van der Poel at 75kg. Del Grosso is the same height as van Aert, but significantly lighter and visibly the skinniest rider (legs and torso) on the podium today. Agreed about seated power. Also gear selection.Del Grosso is definitively heavier than Nys, an probably than MvdP too. He is about the same size as WVA. What made the two Dutch better on that climb was more seated power.
From a neophyte's perspective, I thought the course (from a viewing perspective) was pretty one-dimensional. The things that are often the difference makers on many courses--longer running sections, actual climbing (I'm not including humping up those two ramps), off-camber sidehills, sand. Not that any of these would change the overall winner in the elite races. Of course, other cross World's courses have dominated by one element (e.g., sand), and road World's can also be one-dimensional.
Thanks, it's helpful to get that perspective. Definitely would be a great course to watch in person!Oostende was a sand fest, Fayetteville had a gimmicky long stair climb, but otherwise most of the worlds courses of the last decade had no defining technical feature, notable climbing, or significant running.
I think the usual Hulst course is better, but this one was surely more interesting (and better designed for the on-site spectators) than Lievin or Tabor, the last two hosts.
