Reactions from the peloton

Page 29 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Sep 6, 2012
65
0
0
cineteq said:
The Spaniards comments: Facepalms after facepalms...

facepalm_implied1.jpg
 
May 26, 2011
114
0
0
hrotha said:
Seriously, it's beyond embarrassing now. Anyone knows any good English-speaking French cycling journos on Twitter? I really want to request that interview with Davy.

try @saddleblaze - other way round, English but fluent in French
 
Jul 10, 2009
918
0
0
Iflanceisbannedbanthemall said:
If lance is officially banned for life, than almost all cyclists of the past need to be banned and stripped of their wins. Vaughters, should be banned, Rees, banned, every one. Even the great Eddy Mercxk should be banned and have tours removed. The state of cycling is not defined by lance Armstrong, it was defined by the culture created 50 plus years ago. Cyclists have been doing things to cheat since the beginning, smoking to open the lungs, taking amphetamines, doping, EPO, everything. If cycling is serious, than take any human in the equation out, and that means no deals for anyone. You admit, you are gone. Would all of these snitches have talked if they were threatened with life bans and million dollar fines? Would they have talked if all their accomplishments were removed? If cycling believes holding lance accountable for all dopers, than they really need to look in the mirror. When will the spring classic records be erased, because we all know Musseuw and many of the greats have admitted. So will the records be completely removed?

You have a point. But it is the attitude of Lance that disgusted a lot of people. The arrogance, the bullying, the open trashing of others, sueing/threatening innocent housewives, beating up motorists, sueing newspapers, journalists, fellow bikers etc. An implosion was eminent, so lay the blame firmly at LA's door. We all know the true greats were juiced whether in cycling or in other sports like Athletics etc. But none that I can remember had this kind of DON-like attitude.
 
Jan 14, 2011
504
0
0
Yes and No and who's in charge of the revolution?

Lukenwolf said:
You can have all the will and support for revolution - If nobody takes up the arms, it's a mute idea.
Being born behind the iron courtain in East Germany,
The thing is, that there might be the will for revolution, but nobody is out on the streets protesting.

You re correct in some ways. How many years did it take for East Germans to become "revolutionary"? They did not fo frrom being a herd of passive State Run sheep to revolutionary freedom fighters overnight.

Likewise in cycling, there have been cyclists and journalists trying to reform the UCI / cycling for some time. it takes a lot to go from reform to revolution.

Most "riders in the peloton" seem to fall into two groups.
1. "The Long Ago and Far Away", like Gesink and Schleck. Gesink actually said, or implied, that the whole LA thing was a one team phenomenon, that happened in America, in a previous generation, forgetting that his own team mate Baredo, in Europe, is just now on his way to being busted.

2. The likes of Sanchez. Is that 1000 page report even available in Spanish, French, German and Italian? And how literate are these guys? I doubt many have even turned a page, much less read, analyzed and thought about it. They just cough up the same old: trying to hurt the sport: they can't prove anything: he's just trying to make money on his book: , etc etc crapola

Problem with this revolution is that there does not seem to be anyone to lead it.
 
manafana said:
i see sanchez is still tugging the never tested postive line when he did and did so more than once prehaps. Naive and shows he has something to hide himself

Of course he has. GC and hilly classics riders from other countries are just as suspicious, though. I mean, they have to play the media a certain way and are familiar with that. Spanish riders... not so much.
 
Oct 12, 2012
169
0
0
rickshaw said:
You re correct in some ways. How many years did it take for East Germans to become "revolutionary"? They did not fo frrom being a herd of passive State Run sheep to revolutionary freedom fighters overnight.

It was actually a pretty quick thing. It went from sheep to raging bulls in a matter of 4 to 5 months. In May 1989 the elections were rigged, like they were every four years (cycling: Phat McQuaids MO). But unlike all the 40 years before, people were sick of continuing like that first critical things were published. We started the monday protests and in November the Berlin wall was history. Once the mob reaches critical mass, it all goes south in a damn hurry. Which is why we mustn't allow streamlined media to be silent yet again. This is cyclings tjienanmen moment, it's up to us starting the monday protests...

BTW: the '89 revolution didn't have a leader. The chant "WE are the people" wasn't the main motto without reason. No leader, just most of the people sick of going on with the status quo.
 
Mar 10, 2009
272
2
0
I guess he is worried they are coming after him next. So has to say it is unfair otherwise will look like a hypocrit if other team mates start talking about him.

Everyone knows he most probably doped too though. Greg Lemond says as much. So I believe it. Just wish he wouldn't keep defending Armstrong. Perhaps Come clean himself. We can forgive that era. REgardless he is no Armstrong. He had class and didn't bully the clean riders, etc. Didn't try and win everything.
 
Oct 12, 2012
169
0
0
metaCYCLE said:
what a huge let down... First Sammy and now Mig??? Wow! :mad:

Spanish desease. They all know that the spanish authorities are even more sympathetic with dopists than the UCI. What do they have to fear? I dodn't think they even belive that doping is wrong in any way.
 
Lukenwolf said:
Spanish desease. They all know that the spanish authorities are even more sympathetic with dopists than the UCI. What do they have to fear? I dodn't think they even belive that doping is wrong in any way.

I used to like Samu but this is way too horrible

I mean how can you make such a statement
 
The worst part is that the likes of Samu and Indurain are common in the Spanish peloton. It's really horrible. Most riders and journos are only slightly better: they acknowledge Armstrong is a fraud, but they seem to be more concerned with the witnesses being traitors and snitches. The split among the fans is somewhat less embarrassing, and most hardcore cycling fans are truly appalled by all of this. But casual fans tend to agree with Indurain.
 
Aug 27, 2010
970
0
0
bpickford said:
And now Bruyneel has surfaced on Twitter and endorsed Mig's comments. The ultimate accolade.

Grande Miguel! Siempre ha sido un Caballero, y siempre lo sera!

And people wonder why cycling has problems *vomit*
 
Oct 12, 2012
169
0
0
Bruyneel must have mixed up the blood bags.That guy is such an utter fool. I really hope the Belgians pound the raw stuffing out of him in a trial.
 
Jul 19, 2010
741
1
0
Samu and Indurain are disgraces to cycling. From Armstrong's recent behaviour, even he's accepted he's been caught and deserved to be stripped of the results. So what are these two guys doing?

No wonder cycling has a problem.
 
May 6, 2010
158
0
0
Lukenwolf said:
Spanish desease. They all know that the spanish authorities are even more sympathetic with dopists than the UCI. What do they have to fear? I dodn't think they even belive that doping is wrong in any way.

Why don't you take your ethnic prejudice and racism to a neonazi forum, and shove it up Jan Ullrich, Erik Zabel, Stefan Schumacher, and Team Telekom's ***es.
 
Maybe Sanchez is too old to trot out the "we are paying the price for the previous generation and cycling is clean now" BS - at least he's being honest which is more than you can say for those that are staying "on-message" (even if it leaves little doubt as to how he's gained the results that he has)
 
Apr 26, 2010
358
0
0
Lukenwolf said:
Spanish desease. They all know that the spanish authorities are even more sympathetic with dopists than the UCI. What do they have to fear? I dodn't think they even belive that doping is wrong in any way.

i don't know about that... you may be right, but to me the two simply look like tools. i mean even Liggett ultimately had a more reasonable reaction. :mad: