Page Mill Masochist said:
Notice the change in McQuaid's tone?
You obviously haven't read the article just run by cyclingnews, "McQuaid suggests personal vendetta"...
In it, McQuack says among other things:
- It's too bad Floyd "went public". Really Pat, Really?? Floyd didn't go public. He sent his emails off to US cycling officials, which then leaked them.
- Says you have to question whether the Novitsky investigation is genuine. Gee Pat, is it genuine to investigate illegal PED trafficking, or is that just silly-talk??
- Says the investigation should have been handled internally. Riiiight. Just like the UCI handled the "LA bribe" internally...
- Says there is "nothing" the UCI could have done to favor LA. Riiiight. Like advance phone tipoffs of surprise controls. That would be IMPOSSIBLE. No way it could happen. That is about as likely as say, BKohl's manager bribing lab workers...
Sorry, I don't sense any "change in tone" from McSmack. The dude is still the same crankyanker he was yesterday.
Seriously, CYCLINGNEWS: why do you run this drivel, unchallenged? Where is the "journalistic integrity"? Are you even a journalistic organization -- a just a for-profit cheerleading site??
At least have the courtesy of changing the homepage: CN: "World centre of cycling propaganda"