one of the biggest repercussions would come from the $5 million lawsuit LA filed against some ins. company (SCA?), perjury, etc.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Well, then the puppeteers must have one hell of a convoluted plan, because every time McQuaid speaks, he damages his own and UCI's credibility.flicker said:McQuaid totes the line. Others pull the strings. He is not the dufus or drunken duffer that posters here portray him as.
That is what you think but apples to oranges you are not an attorney, business owner or CEO. Think how BP canned that talking head in the gulf they had. Not the first time.hrotha said:Well, then the puppeteers must have one hell of a convoluted plan, because every time McQuaid speaks, he damages his own and UCI's credibility.
Berzin said:Remember, all people like him do is schmooze with fellow cronies and push paper from one desk to another. The UCI really don't do anything of substance. What was the last thing they did besides set the stupid weight rule for bikes and eliminate the Cinelli Spinaci handlebar extensions?
Do you agree that the contradictory statements regarding these donations hurt their credibility?flicker said:That is what you think but apples to oranges you are not an attorney, business owner or CEO. Think how BP canned that talking head in the gulf they had. Not the first time.
flicker said:That is what you think but apples to oranges you are not an attorney, business owner or CEO. Think how BP canned that talking head in the gulf they had. Not the first time.
flicker said:I have no doubt that there are many Armstronglike donations to the UCI right? By many teams and individuals. And from what I have heard the riders, DSs, team owners love their PEDs right. Why would Armstrong be extraordinary in his "contributions?
hrotha said:Do you agree that the contradictory statements regarding these donations hurt their credibility?
Alpe d'Huez said:I'm not even sure how to respond to that.
flicker said:McQuaid is right it is a personal vendetta. As I have always said Floyd/Walsh/LeMonds issues are not about doping they are personal issues against certain individuals. F W L need to take large looks inside of themselves dig deep in their pockets full o' courage and get it straight. You dope once you are a doper for life. Doesn't make a difference if it is benzedrine some unknown powder at the Olympic trials or nationals or the finest blood spiked with 100 percent crit EPO. Doping all the same and across the board.
on3m@n@rmy said:"McQuaid suggests US Postal investigation sparked by personal vendetta"... vendetta spin... my heads spinnin!
workingclasshero said:re: lance and cancer riding, I know when LA raced a 'cancer crit' in norway just after TdF09 he did so in return for £200k, when asked what he'd do with the money he replied (paraphrasing) "i might give them to livestrong". Can't believe no noise has been made of that.
thehog said: