Yes I agree because even if a rider is caught from a retrospective test he still gets to keep all his prize money and wages..he might even be invited with open arms to commentate on cycling and do tv adds like Mr Virenque..so being caught isn't so bad after all.... But seriously I agree with mrhender..unless retrospective testing is enforced properly riders will just call its bluff.. wages should be taken back from a rider found guilty of doping and his prize money given to the next clean rider in the results (after all the guilty rider has stolen the prize money off the clean rider when he cheated to beat him)...that's the only way it will work properly.
Sitting in front of a room full of journalists and tearfully admitting to past wrong doings is one thing but how can it have any substance if all those ill gotten gains are not returned to their rightfull owner ie. Bradley Wiggins (only kidding there btw )
Sitting in front of a room full of journalists and tearfully admitting to past wrong doings is one thing but how can it have any substance if all those ill gotten gains are not returned to their rightfull owner ie. Bradley Wiggins (only kidding there btw )