I read the article, so what? There was nothing extraordinary hinted at. They had a coach that was into scientific monitoring and some funky cardio gadget, and then?
Here's the thing, I highly, highly doubt that these guys were up to anything nefarious as teenagers in B.C.. Possible but seriously doubtful. When they met the wider world of international competition in the 90's, entirely probable they were onboard for the ride. Otherwise we wouldn't be talking about them.
You just don't understand the backwater culture they came from. We weren't totally naive as to what was going on in Europe, or bigger races in N.A. for that matter, and I'm not suggesting it was lily white here either but on the whole one could compete, and succeed, clean. At least through the amateur ranks. The talent shone through easily.
I (for ex.) went to Europe in '90 to see what was what, got the ultimatum from the team (amateurs), held the vial in my hand and thought "this isn't fun anymore". I walked away, others (I personally know) didn't.
The '90's were what they were, through to today. I suspect it's a lot better now but that mindset doesn't just magically vanish. Everyone has been looking for an advantage forever, nothing new.
Did Ryder win the Giro clean? I have no idea. I have some idea of the mindset(culture) he started from, and the mindset(culture) he would have encountered on his rise, the choices he would have faced. That he's still around speaks volumes to me about his past choices but that's just me. I gave it all up in '91 as the writing was on the wall.
I have no sour grapes, there were more talented riders I was aware of that gave up too. I`m also under no delusions. C`est la vie. Life goes on.