- May 19, 2010
- 1,899
- 0
- 0
Benotti69 said:How did Sky know Vini were doping?
They saw some neon yellow dudes running off with their good stuff.
Benotti69 said:How did Sky know Vini were doping?
Taxus4a said:Why?
Sky is very freakie antidoping, specially Wiggo...
.
So what you're saying is, you WANT Mauro Santambrogio to feel suicidal, and all dopers to feel the same. That because he cheated in a sporting event, he deserves to be put into a position where death is the best way out.Taxus4a said:I have just read an interview to Santa of today.
He is bad, but it is really how he deserve to feel. He must pay not just as cyclist, but as person as well. It is the only way to change this, that he feel as the worst for the cycling world and the society...unless he apologize and try to help cycling in some way.
No apologize for the damage to cycling again. I cant say what I feel of that man, becouse it was deleted in other message.
He says cycling is his life...He was very.........to doing that choice.
He said he felt as a champion in the Giro, and now... Man, that the prize you must pay, and this is a message for all the riders that try to do the same: YOU WILL PAY.
I am sorry to be so hard, but must be like that, he has his friend to avoid his suicide, he didnt respect cycling world, and stil do it by dont apologize. He cant have my respect.
I know how he feels, I have feel like that sometimes, but he need apologize. it was his fault, just his fault, we have had long time when you can consider a lot of factors when a man dope, the environment, a lot of people did it, pressure, loft controls,...a lot of good and fair persons doped. But today is very stupid to dope, and more in that way that make him one of the best riders of the year.
I didnt mind if Wiggins or Froome suicide if one thay is proven that they dope just one day is their life. I am not goping to help that, but I would be very very hard. It would be very serious after his statements in the era we are. It would be much more serious than Santa. I know it is not the case, but just in case... and they know that now things are like that, we could excuse Lance, but we wont escuse things like that in the future. They have the choice today: dont dope. Today they are not escuses to say no.
Froome knows that is one day is proven he doped just once, his life will be a hell and he will want to die.
Andy for instance, has denied doping, but if tomorrow is proven that he doped in the past, it is not the same case, it was another time, and nobody talked about that, and feel they were doing the correct thing. I hope no, but I wouldnt be surprised
You are a pretty sick person who lives in a dreamworld. Get some help.Taxus4a said:I have just read an interview to Santa of today.
He is bad, but it is really how he deserve to feel. He must pay not just as cyclist, but as person as well. It is the only way to change this, that he feel as the worst for the cycling world and the society...unless he apologize and try to help cycling in some way.
No apologize for the damage to cycling again. I cant say what I feel of that man, becouse it was deleted in other message.
He says cycling is his life...He was very.........to doing that choice.
He said he felt as a champion in the Giro, and now... Man, that the prize you must pay, and this is a message for all the riders that try to do the same: YOU WILL PAY.
I am sorry to be so hard, but must be like that, he has his friend to avoid his suicide, he didnt respect cycling world, and stil do it by dont apologize. He cant have my respect.
I know how he feels, I have feel like that sometimes, but he need apologize. it was his fault, just his fault, we have had long time when you can consider a lot of factors when a man dope, the environment, a lot of people did it, pressure, loft controls,...a lot of good and fair persons doped. But today is very stupid to dope, and more in that way that make him one of the best riders of the year.
I didnt mind if Wiggins or Froome suicide if one thay is proven that they dope just one day is their life. I am not goping to help that, but I would be very very hard. It would be very serious after his statements in the era we are. It would be much more serious than Santa. I know it is not the case, but just in case... and they know that now things are like that, we could excuse Lance, but we wont escuse things like that in the future. They have the choice today: dont dope. Today they are not escuses to say no.
Froome knows that is one day is proven he doped just once, his life will be a hell and he will want to die.
Andy for instance, has denied doping, but if tomorrow is proven that he doped in the past, it is not the same case, it was another time, and nobody talked about that, and feel they were doing the correct thing. I hope no, but I wouldnt be surprised
Taxus4a said:I didnt mind if Wiggins or Froome suicide if one thay is proven that they dope just one day is their life.
TheGame said:Is this guy for real? I really hope, that neither you, nor any of your family get struck down by mental illness, and if you do, I really hope people don't have the attitude towards you that you have towards them.
Benotti69 said:I bet Landis would give those millions for his marriage and his father in law, but sadly money cant buy anything back.
To not see the hard road Landis has been and come out with BS about money either shows an obession with money, a complete lack of understanding or both.
TourOfSardinia said:I don't see why Mauro doesn't meet up with Riccò and Di Luca and have
a few out of competition races. You might get some public turning up just to see how they are doing.
MarkvW said:Landis suffered because of his own bad choices. I don't see how that makes him a victim.
Although immediately fired by his Vini Fantini-Selle Italia team, Santambrogio’s case remains in the balance, given that the UCI has yet to confirm the analysis of the B sample. In September, it was reported that the low levels of EPO in the A sample – believed to indicative of micro-dosing – were such that they might not be repeated in an analysis of the B sample, in which case Santambrogio would be cleared.
TheGame said:Is this guy for real? I really hope, that neither you, nor any of your family get struck down by mental illness, and if you do, I really hope people don't have the attitude towards you that you have towards them.
MarkvW said:Landis suffered because of his own bad choices. I don't see how that makes him a victim.
Benotti69 said:I did not say he was a victim. But your take is wrong.
For me that Landis was the keystone to the 'reasoned decision' is enough to give some accolades. For doping he got more than was deserved and I am suspicious of Armstrong's part in that. But does he deserves millions from the qui tam case? Yep he does.
Santambrogio is fortunate to have so many looking out for him. I hope he is able to move forward away from cycling and find a life where cheating is not the norm.
Benotti69 said:I did not say he was a victim. But your take is wrong.
For me that Landis was the keystone to the 'reasoned decision' is enough to give some accolades. For doping he got more than was deserved and I am suspicious of Armstrong's part in that. But does he deserves millions from the qui tam case? Yep he does.
thehog said:I would add Cipolinni to this. When Ricco had gone off the edge he gave him a bike and some part time work. Got him riding again. Ricco had put on 20kg and had a young child to support. Now in a much better place. Riding the fondo scene which doesn't have the mafia roots like pro-cycling does.
ElChingon said:That was true Omerta working the way it should or is supposed to work. Santambrogio doesn't seem to be in it (omerta) or it has fallen back a a bit. This new generation might not be as well covered.
ElChingon said:That was true Omerta working the way it should or is supposed to work. Santambrogio doesn't seem to be in it (omerta) or it has fallen back a a bit. This new generation might not be as well covered.
Race Radio said:Note that Santambrogio and yet to be given his official sanction, even though he tested positive 8 months ago. This is because he has been working with the UCI and CONI telling them what he knows in exchange for a reduced sanction. He could be racing later this year.
Think BMC is concerned?