no its being realist...Waterloo Sunrise said:Evans support group kicks in to action.
In the Dauphine, the irrelevant training race, Evans lost 4 seconds to Brad and beat Dennis by 9 seconds.
Maybe Evans was peaking for a training race, who knows.
But please, keep going with the rewriting of history and pretending this is a par performance for Cadel. He's better than this, and he will probably show it tomorrow, but it's sweet to watch you denying his ability.
El Pistolero said:Well, that only shows how much you'll have to fear Menchov in the coming 3 weeks.![]()
Don't think Cadel was crap at the start of that Tour. He was coming off the Giro and took yellow early on, before he cracked (his elbow).Waterloo Sunrise said:Compared to their TT ability, Evans has a much better pedigree in short efforts than Dennis. He was 20 seconds in front in 2010 (the tour where Dennis was good and Cadel was crap).
thehog said:Chavanel! Brillent! He should win tomorrow's stage and take yellow.
AussieEdge said:no its being realist...
9 seconds can easily be made up and passed in 3 weeks
your acting like its the worst performance in history and he's down by 100 seconds
Get real
Waterloo Sunrise said:I agree, and I'm pleased that for once you're beating a tactical retreat in the face of reality.
I'm sure Evans will do well over the next few weeks, but this performance today was less than he is capable of.
Incidentally I also think Wiggins was slightly below par today, but it's masked by Tony's incident and Cadel's performance.
If only.................................... wouln't it be great.Mshengu said:Bravo Fabian! now go on and win the Tour of France!!!!
thehog said:Thanks Hog agreed.
AussieEdge said:no its being realist...
9 seconds can easily be made up and passed in 3 weeks
your acting like its the worst performance in history and he's down by 100 seconds
Get real
Logic-is-your-friend said:Well... some interesting results. Sagan, Samu, Monfort, JVDB... disappointing. Cancellara, Nibali, Menchov... on the other hand.
stop acting like he's lost the tour then...Waterloo Sunrise said:It's a bit windy to be constructing strawmen.
You are acting like it was a good or average performance. It was below par for cadel. 8 times out of 10, he would do better in this situation. It could have been worse, but please stop the delusion and admit it was not good.
Just a minor omission: Cadel EvansDekker_Tifosi said:Differences are pretty small..
GC favorites (might have missed a few, sorry)
1 Wiggins
2 Menchov +6
3 Froome +10
4 P Velits +11
5 Nibali +11
6 Hesjedal +11
7 Klöden +12
8 Westra +13
9 Mollema +14
10 Brajkovic +15
11 Pinot +17
12 Poels +17
13 D Martin +17
14 N Roche +18
15 Coppel +18
16 Gesink +19
17 Vinokourov +19
18 Vandenbroeck +21
19 Leipheimer +21
20 Basso +22
21 Kruijswijk +23
22 Horner +27
23 Valverde +28
24 Scarponi +30
25 F Schleck +31
26 S Sanchez +33
27 Cobo +37
28 Rolland +38
El Pistolero said:Or was it just Menchov that did better than he's capable of?
![]()
Hey, I thought Wiggins was disappointing after the first time check and then he ended up nearly winning.
yeah and we have 3 weeks of Alps and Pyrenees to get through first....Inquitus said:9 seconds in 6km is a fair whack, when we have 95 more km of TT to go.
cineteq said:Just a minor omission: Cadel EvansYou can add Basso too.
Someone missing?Dekker_Tifosi said:Differences are pretty small..
GC favorites (might have missed a few, sorry)
1 Wiggins
2 Menchov +6
3 Froome +10
4 P Velits +11
5 Nibali +11
6 Hesjedal +11
7 Klöden +12
8 Westra +13
9 Mollema +14
10 Brajkovic +15
11 Pinot +17
12 Poels +17
13 D Martin +17
14 N Roche +18
15 Coppel +18
16 Gesink +19
17 Vinokourov +19
18 Vandenbroeck +21
19 Leipheimer +21
20 Basso +22
21 Kruijswijk +23
22 Horner +27
23 Valverde +28
24 Scarponi +30
25 F Schleck +31
26 S Sanchez +33
27 Cobo +37
28 Rolland +38
Waterloo Sunrise said:Yeah, Evans expected to lose time to Menchov, and his own ****ty teammate.
Honest Guv, nothing to see here.
cineteq said:Just a minor omission: Cadel EvansYou can add Basso too.