Another interview in the McGee series on ridermedia. Talks about yates too. All of these McGee articles are worth reading.
http://www.ridemedia.com.au/?p=7636
http://www.ridemedia.com.au/?p=7636
ToreBear said:Another interview in the McGee series on ridermedia. Talks about yates too. All of these McGee articles are worth reading.
http://www.ridemedia.com.au/?p=7636
coinneach said:I am always willing to re-evaluate my position when other people make points: Of course the Murdoch influence in the British Press cannot be ignored, and perhaps I underestimated its potential influence. But I happen to enjoy Richard Moores writing. Would he be strong enough to do a Krimmage? I doubt it, but we can't all be heros.
It hadn't occurred to me that Bobbins might be British, but now that you mention it. He was, however, unlike you, making a valid point
Maybe in future I'll look at the name of the poster and decide if it'll be worth reading......might reduce our interaction though![]()
Dear Wiggo said:You must be hard of reading or something.
I say "He's a sky employee" and you call me "slagging off Richard Moore".
Bobbins says "He's in Sky's pocket" and you give him props for being able to school you in reevaluating your position after making a point.
So let me just clarify here:
"In Sky's pocket" is NOT slagging someone off.
"A Sky employee" IS slagging someone off.
Is that how it goes?
Good effing grief.
bobbins said:He is freelance but is also smart enough to know which side his bread is buttered on. If I remember right, Robert Miller was upset with some aspects of the book although I am happy to be corrected on this.
For me the most exciting part of the book must be the Epilogue, where Richard shares his e-mail communications with Robert Millar about the writing of the book. What a fascinating exchange.
bobbins said:He is freelance but is also smart enough to know which side his bread is buttered on. If I remember right, Robert Miller was upset with some aspects of the book although I am happy to be corrected on this.
ToreBear said:Another interview in the McGee series on ridermedia. Talks about yates too. All of these McGee articles are worth reading.
http://www.ridemedia.com.au/?p=7636
Cycle Chic said:I heard today that Sean Yates was spotted in an unmarked car at the Tour of the Algarve....interesting.
Any news of what Yates is doing at the mo ??
thehog said:Confidant to the "Pro's".
He's the new Rudy Pevenage or Stefano Ferrari.
The link man. Between rider to Doctor.
bobbins said:Retires due to ill health then lines up at a local elite road circuit race. Then this. He's really taking the **** isn't he!
"There is no one at Sky who knows much about bike riding"
Some even suggested Yates's health issues were associated with doping in his riding career. He ignores those comments.
Cycle Chic said:Not a bad article from the Guardian....written with a hint of sarcasm
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2013/sep/12/lance-armstrong-chris-froome-sean-yates
Omertà. Look it up.Bernie's eyesore said:Given how bitter Yates seems to be about the way he was forced out at Sky, it's quite surprising he hasn't chosen to reveal any of his dark secrets about Sky's doping programme in this new book. Obviously he didn't want his sons to know the truth about what their dad used to get up to, that's the only explanation I can think of. Now he's lumbered with a book which will barely sell a copy when he could easily have had a massive best seller on his hands.
hrotha said:Omertà. Look it up.
del1962 said:Yate says Sky no nothing about bike racing, but what would he have added, as he only drove the car![]()
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/yates-defends-armstrong-but-is-critical-of-team-skywebvan said:Where did that "know nothing about cycling" come from, it's certainly not in that article, or is it a rambling on "a large knowledge gap" ? Ridiculous clinic extrapolation as usual...
"There is no one at Sky who knows much about bike riding"
webvan said:...how can he even be climbing Mont Ventoux and Alpe-d'Huez with a pacemaker ?!
if there's nothing to reveal at sky, they wouldn't be hiring proven omertists like sean.webvan said:Where did that "know nothing about cycling" come from, it's certainly not in that article, or is it a rambling on "a large knowledge gap" ? Ridiculous clinic extrapolation as usual...
Oh and maybe he doesn't reveal anything about doping at Sky because there is nothing to reveal ? Oh wait, someone here has solid evidence that they are doped to the gills...
"he has had two strokes and has a pacemaker fitted to his ailing heart"
Didn't know that, wow that's terrible, how can he even be climbing Mont Ventoux and Alpe-d'Huez with a pacemaker ?!
Netserk said: