Mellow Velo said:'fraid I'd have to add Cadel's Tour ITT, too.
TeamSkyFans said:Levi in Toc and Utah/Horner in ToC. One of the few times ive watched the tv and just laughed. and the fact that there was no testing says it all.
Gilbert. The first win was fine, two was fine, but by the time it became predicatable I had lost all interest.
But most laughably obvious of the year was Levi and Horner.. theres really nothing else came close. Whats funnier is that its a **** pot race that nobody outside of America cares about.
lightclimber said:Exactly! With all the in-house testing done by SKY you'd think they would've had a clue on what Froome was capable of. Say for example "oh on 6/11/11 test, Froome rode 44 minutes @ 415 watts on the trainer, then he followed that up with 52 minutes @ 435 watts 3 weeks later"... But they had NO IDEA what he was capable of... =CHARGING 100%
And Cobo - he goes from wanting to retire and become an electrician to 4 months later winning the Vuelta? Seriously... You expect us to believe that performance?
Made the Vuelta into a laughingstock...![]()
Zoncolan said:Bottle and Horner @ ToC
ghostofjoy said:wrong, horner and levi have always been good climbers, and it's quite possible that they peaked for the TOC. i might have been able to believe that their performance was legit, had it not been for MATT BUSCHE riding the entire race off of his wheel.
i would love to see future races prove that busche's performance on baldy was simply the first revelation of a climbing prodigy. i am overwhelmingly doubtful that this will happen, however.
Caruut said:Obviously they would say this, but Sky did explicitly say that their testing showed he should be getting better results than he did. Sky's in-house testing has nothing to do with how questionable Froome's ride was.
craig1985 said:So what do people think of Peter Sagan? First GT and he wins three stages, big time charger or just freakin' good?
Berzin said:Leipheimer and Horner at the ToC.
Leipheimer at the Tour of Utah. No testing at either race, and since I'm convinced they had advanced knowledge of this, they had to have been doped to the gills.
Both these guys are at the back ends of their respective careers, and by all accounts should not be having performances like they had in 2011. But the doping at Radio Shack goes on seemingly undisturbed, and these two guys are at the top of the list to me.
TeamSkyFans said:Levi in Toc and Utah/Horner in ToC. One of the few times ive watched the tv and just laughed. and the fact that there was no testing says it all.
Gilbert. The first win was fine, two was fine, but by the time it became predicatable I had lost all interest.
But most laughably obvious of the year was Levi and Horner.. theres really nothing else came close. Whats funnier is that its a **** pot race that nobody outside of America cares about.
Zam_Olyas said:yep, it was unbelievable
stage 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7kZt2JCrsE
stage 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=KW0xUE8UwXs
Maxiton said:Where is the Like button?
+1
They made Piepoli and Cobo look like cubscouts on Schwinn Stingrays. Especially on state 7. Ridiculous.
craig1985 said:I thought it was all the beetroot juice that they drink? I used to like Horner until he sold out and started riding for Bruyneel.
Timmy-loves-Rabo said:Froome by a mile.
I don't like Horner's ride either.
Parrulo said:i have been disliking horner ever since he said paulinho was a talentless rider that was only riding the 2009 tour because he was bff's with contador. talk about being butthurt for not being selected.
DirtyWorks said:whoaaah there ghostofjoy.... A top-tier professional cyclist is going to peak for some third-rate event in a sleepy backwater cycling nation like the U.S. with the acknowledged 'biggest bike race in the world' is only a few weeks away? Really? I could see Busche peaking for it, but not Horner and Levi. No way.
