thehog said:That's terrible! But I'm sure it will be lapped up.
Can the Dawg save cycling!my god.
![]()
In many ways I prefer DM's model to the half baked stuff the other "high quality" news sites delivers.
thehog said:That's terrible! But I'm sure it will be lapped up.
Can the Dawg save cycling!my god.
![]()
Parker said:Want a bet on it? Put your money where your mouth is. If I'm one of those people and I'm not, agree to a one month ban.
If mods had any decency they would ban false accusations. It's like footballers waving cards.
Dazed and Confused said:In many ways I prefer DM's model to the half baked stuff the other "high quality" news sites delivers.
Dazed and Confused said:In many ways I prefer DM's model to the half baked stuff the other "high quality" news sites delivers.
That's there usual level of debate. It's like a cult - demonize the oppostion, try to make out that they are part of a campaign. Get a favourable enforcer (Sitting Bison) to eliminate them.del1962 said:I see they have called you a bot, a troll and a sock puppet. Didn't Lance Armstrong call David Walsh a troll
Parker said:That's there usual level of debate. It's like a cult - demonize the oppostion, try to make out that they are part of a campaign. Get a favourable enforcer (Sitting Bison) to eliminate them.
Look for the lifetime ban because I admitted to having a previous account that I can't access.
Benotti69 said:Bassons not only talks the talk but walks the walk. Walsh was right on Armstrong. Walsh has admitted it was personal.
But why change the subject from Bassons criticism of Sky?
Off topic.....but it is amazing how unbelievable the sky doping deniers are and their criticism of the clinic yet they return continously to a place the profess to intensely dislike...![]()
I think they're clean because I look at the personnel and think they are honest on past history.the sceptic said:Well, maybe instead of whining you could debate why you think sky are cleans? Or are you on the fence perhaps?
del1962 said:Also on another topic, didn't Paul Kimmage do an article in the Mail which has been linked to, criticising Sky, not that I am a fan of the mail, but is is amazing how fickle many in the clinic are
Parker said:I think they're clean because I look at the personnel and think they are honest on past history.
However, I have no real vested interest in whether they are clean or not. I don't need to spend every day debating it.
I've not really committed as much emotionally as most of you have. I'm not lusting after that 'I told you so' moment
Benotti69 said:the monstrosity that the TdF has become
Parker said:That thing about the passport, you highlighted. No-one has said it's perfect, but it's better to have it than not.
msjett said:
Benotti69 said:I think the DM in htis case firmly has its tongue in its cheek for smarter readers. But the DM is still an appalling publication.
The high quality from the others is rare.......
mrhender said:http://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme-sur-route/Article/Dave-brailsford-gagner-avec-un-francais/23029
Interesting, have only read the headlines..
Brailsford apparently talking about winning with a frenchman because the team needs a new goal after succeding with a Brit...
Maybe he knows Froome will not last long, or/and to change team?
Surely would be strange "ditching" Froome who should have several years in him yet.. Unless he knows something we don't![]()
Maybe a full read is neccesary, will have a look at it later..
mrhender said:Maybe a full read is neccesary, will have a look at it later..
thehog said:Translation:
"I hate the #%%ing frogs like any Brit does but I need your journalists to lay off us in the coming 2 weeks, so I'll make up some BS about winning with a French rider so you'll like us more"
I mean, hell, it's not like you can pick and choose who wins. Or Sky seems to think so! I guess after winning with Froome Brailsford would think he can win with anyone!
thehog said:...btw...
Has Brailsford hit the AICAR?
![]()
Rollthedice said:Reza from Europcar could fit the Froome profile pre-Vuelta.