- Jan 22, 2011
- 404
- 3
- 9,285
the big ring said:ip address... 192.168.0.1 .... please DOS that address asap....
...!!
the big ring said:ip address... 192.168.0.1 .... please DOS that address asap....
Benotti69 said:it would appear Tinman is part of the liestrong army of bots
the big ring said:Hi Polish.
ps. your posting style...is ... exactly the same ... as ebandit .... you know....
...periods, periods...
..everywhere...
...and not a drop of ink...
ip address... 192.168.0.1 .... please DOS that address asap....
Tinman said:.... My take is still that she is a very smart, intense but complicated lady who got personally caught up in the unfolding LA drama. Don't underestimate how many people have been sucked into this bulls**t ...
About LauraLyn
Biography
still studying (ugh), working, travelling, dreaming about growing up, single and connected
icebreaker said:Too F'ing late for this forum to be of any use to anyone.
Besides, the way this place works that poster will probably already have another 5 id's set up and ready to go, and the mods will do nothing about it.
What the hell were the mods doing for the last month while the place got torn to pieces?
blutto said:...ok, this may come as a total surprise to you, but Polish is seen by some your forum colleagues as one of of the bright lights in an otherwise dark and dreary place....
...btw, count me as one of his admirers, and I count the minutes until his august return....
Cheers
blutto
icebreaker said:Too F'ing late for this forum to be of any use to anyone.
Besides, the way this place works that poster will probably already have another 5 id's set up and ready to go, and the mods will do nothing about it.
What the hell were the mods doing for the last month while the place got torn to pieces?
Havetts said:Cool and all, but Blutto is not Polish.
p.s. it took you moderators a frikking while to get rid of LauraLynn, when Dim was dox'd the person who did so was banned within a few hours.
Elagabalus said:I don't know... have you read her bio?
palmerq said:well i was only just made aware of this happening today
Tinman said:Mate if you are the moderator here I apologize for having to tell you the truth but you have been asleep on the job. Many many posts on this in many many threads for well over a month now.
I Watch Cycling In July said:Woohoo. LauraLyn baninated for life.
Took a while.
me.. it was brought it to my attention that ll had been up to no good so i investigated it and after some pms and information gathering i concluded this fellow was up to no good, so i have banned them for good.mewmewmew13 said:Who posted the announcement that LL was permanently banned?
I missed it all.![]()
Tinman said:Mods any chance creating a part of the forum, or separate thread(s) that allows posting by "qualified" posters only, you know who they are, and read access only by others. You have built a site which is contributing to the change in cycling we need, a place where one gets the critical questions asked and some real inside scoop. As well you have created a commercial asset. Please don't allow those with possible alterior motives or other plain idiots to ruin this for you and us.
Qualification can be by identity (you as admins knowing who the poster is and the identity qualifying the poster), or by post quality over time. I'm sure you can think of other criteria.
You may also consider more active moderation, the forum is one of your major assets, the community you have created. If one had Omerta ambitions your forum would be one of the first targets, ie clog it with heaps of ****. Easy to do, create lots of identities, some with ambiguous styles, and just drown out all the good threads over time...
Please find a better way.
Yours truly, a simple cycling fan who wants to be informed (and ask questions) beyond the average journo contributions in the main stream media. Thanks.
Tinman said:in agreement. I am not not precious abut execution. But there needs to be an execution that keeps things focused - i suspect you will only get that by qualifying posters. The rest of the forum can still be used as is by all. If you have better suggestions post them.
by invitation by CN perhaps? Some of these guys are VIPs in the game, just like airlines/hotel chains run VIP programs. Riff raff in cattle class please (myself included). CN knows who they are, and they themselves know. They have been here for years. We need to protect them for the bigger cause, to allow them to help clean up this corrupt mess for our kids.
sorry but a little naive. There are those posting here who have other objectives, ie to have this conversation broken up (I wonder why), and some that are simply stupid and/or need an off line social life![]()
Tinman said:sorry for 3rd post in a row. Wanted to clarify the intent.
Suggestion is to only have a small part of the forum, a few threads, with VIP "post" and general public "read" access. If non-VIPs want to comment they can do so in general threads. VIP's can pick up comments from general threads and re-post these in theirs, or indeed post in general threads.
In the off line world you can also not partake in many VIP conversations... And by the way, I hate the selectivity of a "VIP" concept, but it's not the point.
And I would suggest we get over the "general everyone's forum" idealism. Most forums don't work because of the huge amount of **** on them. The clinic I suspect has been a fairly select hang out until recently, but it's now likely to be targeted (another conspiracy theory right!), certainly having an increase in readership/active posts (I suspect).
So do something rapidly or lose it. Suggestions welcomed, opinion only much less worthwhile...
Tinman said:voted maybe/other. There may be other (perhaps additional) options to reduce clutter and make for easier reading.
The question is how do you reduce noise and increase quality of postings. To better group posts by threads is only partly addressing this, but with the volume of topic developments and overlaps as well as an increase in posters it's going to be hard to execute.
And therefore I do remain of the opinion that it's at the poster level there needs to be better controls, not only postings. Providing a thread (or more) for the guys who we all know shape opinion here and have inside links/info, are connected, etc is one option. Better moderation another, but again hard to do.
Maybe can look also at how other forums resolve this issue; can't be unique to CN, must be some best practice out there, if not, maybe an opportunity to experiment here at the clinic.
palmerq said:me.. it was brought it to my attention that ll had been up to no good so i investigated it and after some pms and information gathering i concluded this fellow was up to no good, so i have banned them for good.
anyway get back on topic :S whatever that is
palmerq said:yes thats true, i will try to do better in the future
JA.Tri said:If anyone has time/inclination (Big Ben/Tower of Pisa), please PM me a brief explanation.
Maxiton said:Obvious Polish is obvious.![]()
