Sockpuppet speculation

Page 13 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 27, 2012
1,436
0
0
Benotti69 said:
it would appear Tinman is part of the liestrong army of bots

Benotti I like your humor, but not sure why the allegation, and it doesn't speak well for you if you are not trying to be funny. Yes conspiracies are rife here, but me? I am almost honored.

Search for my posts on LL, although some of yesterday's ones have been deleted by Bala Verde. I suspect I wasn't far off the truth on her, and probably responsible at least in part for her demise here. I still don't think she is a bot, the technology is not as sophisticated yet to my knowledge - I posted some (now deleted) links on chatterbots technology yesterday. Bala Verde rightly observed they were off topic, should have been in this thread. But the reason I posted these was to "test" the bot theory, to which she very cleverly replied actually. My take is still that she is a very smart, intense but complicated lady who got personally caught up in the unfolding LA drama. Don't underestimate how many people have been sucked into this bulls**t and are quite prepared to spend hours a day on this forum/topic. But I don't have the IP address(es) from which she posts, nor her sign up details.

If you care to read my posts on LA I think my position is pretty clear also on him, as well as my position on UCI.

My motivation is a simple one, to try and be better informed and where possible do my little bit to help clean up this corrupt doping farce cycling has become under Lance/Hein/Pat. If you want to know more or have remaining doubts, PM me, happy to talk.

And maybe next time insert a smiley so I know you are "taking the p**s" (Auzzie slang for "joking"), and not "pulling my leg" ("having me on").

Cheers.
 
Jan 27, 2011
3,399
0
0
the big ring said:
Hi Polish.

ps. your posting style...is ... exactly the same ... as ebandit .... you know....

...periods, periods...
..everywhere...
...and not a drop of ink...
ip address... 192.168.0.1 .... please DOS that address asap....

Cool and all, but Blutto is not Polish :).

p.s. it took you moderators a frikking while to get rid of LauraLynn, when Dim was dox'd the person who did so was banned within a few hours.
 
May 21, 2010
581
0
0
Tinman said:
.... My take is still that she is a very smart, intense but complicated lady who got personally caught up in the unfolding LA drama. Don't underestimate how many people have been sucked into this bulls**t ...

I don't know... have you read her bio?

About LauraLyn

Biography
still studying (ugh), working, travelling, dreaming about growing up, single and connected

Something tells me that someone who is still studying, working and travelling is already past the "dreaming about growing up" stage. Or maybe she's 12 years old.
 

the big ring

BANNED
Jul 28, 2009
2,135
0
0
icebreaker said:
Too F'ing late for this forum to be of any use to anyone.

Besides, the way this place works that poster will probably already have another 5 id's set up and ready to go, and the mods will do nothing about it.

What the hell were the mods doing for the last month while the place got torn to pieces?

I flagged its posts and they were dealt with typically immediately. Who else here flagged her posts?
 
May 21, 2010
581
0
0
blutto said:
...ok, this may come as a total surprise to you, but Polish is seen by some your forum colleagues as one of of the bright lights in an otherwise dark and dreary place....

...btw, count me as one of his admirers, and I count the minutes until his august return....

Cheers

blutto

He was supposed to be back in August!!
 
May 14, 2010
5,303
4
0
icebreaker said:
Too F'ing late for this forum to be of any use to anyone.

Besides, the way this place works that poster will probably already have another 5 id's set up and ready to go, and the mods will do nothing about it.

What the hell were the mods doing for the last month while the place got torn to pieces?

1) We all need to be a lot more vocal about reporting things;

2) Race Radio gave up too easily, I think, but hopefully he'll be back.

For some reason I assumed the mods knew about the outing of RR but, because of the way it was done, they were okay with it. It wasn't until today, when I took the time to really think about it, that I knew they couldn't be aware of it because, if they were, there's no way they'd be okay with it, no matter how it was done.

The history of this forum has been one of constant trolling to try to disrupt it. It's never been successful and it wasn't this time, either. This one just took a little longer to deal with than most, because he/she was a little more clever than they usually are.

EDIT: Or, to be fair, let's say the troll was successful in disrupting it. His/her success was short lived, however. It's up to us, the regular posters, to make sure the disruption isn't permanent like his/her ban.
 
Mar 19, 2009
1,796
0
0
Havetts said:
Cool and all, but Blutto is not Polish :).

p.s. it took you moderators a frikking while to get rid of LauraLynn, when Dim was dox'd the person who did so was banned within a few hours.

well i was only just made aware of this happening today, and to be fair it was a bit of a vague post made by ll
 
Aug 27, 2012
1,436
0
0
palmerq said:
well i was only just made aware of this happening today

Mate if you are the moderator here I apologize for having to tell you the truth but you have been asleep on the job. Many many posts on this in many many threads for well over a month now.

And regarding trolls in general and the forum being a target, which has been going on for some time also, apparently, there are plenty who are making suggestions on how to resolve. I have posted on this also, including making constructive suggestions for change several times. The impression I am getting is that this is simply not being picked up by you guys at all.

And half the reason RR walked was not because of the trolls, but because of you guys being asleep on the job, as I interpreted his posts on this. IMHO.
 
Mar 19, 2009
1,796
0
0
Tinman said:
Mate if you are the moderator here I apologize for having to tell you the truth but you have been asleep on the job. Many many posts on this in many many threads for well over a month now.

yes thats true, i will try to do better in the future
 
Mar 19, 2009
1,796
0
0
mewmewmew13 said:
Who posted the announcement that LL was permanently banned?

I missed it all.:confused:
me.. it was brought it to my attention that ll had been up to no good so i investigated it and after some pms and information gathering i concluded this fellow was up to no good, so i have banned them for good.

anyway get back on topic :S whatever that is
 
Aug 27, 2012
1,436
0
0
Apology accepted. For the record - from my previous posts (1015017, 1015104, 1015131, 1016413) - now I seem to have your attention:

Tinman said:
Mods any chance creating a part of the forum, or separate thread(s) that allows posting by "qualified" posters only, you know who they are, and read access only by others. You have built a site which is contributing to the change in cycling we need, a place where one gets the critical questions asked and some real inside scoop. As well you have created a commercial asset. Please don't allow those with possible alterior motives or other plain idiots to ruin this for you and us.

Qualification can be by identity (you as admins knowing who the poster is and the identity qualifying the poster), or by post quality over time. I'm sure you can think of other criteria.

You may also consider more active moderation, the forum is one of your major assets, the community you have created. If one had Omerta ambitions your forum would be one of the first targets, ie clog it with heaps of ****. Easy to do, create lots of identities, some with ambiguous styles, and just drown out all the good threads over time...

Please find a better way.

Yours truly, a simple cycling fan who wants to be informed (and ask questions) beyond the average journo contributions in the main stream media. Thanks.

Tinman said:
in agreement. I am not not precious abut execution. But there needs to be an execution that keeps things focused - i suspect you will only get that by qualifying posters. The rest of the forum can still be used as is by all. If you have better suggestions post them.



by invitation by CN perhaps? Some of these guys are VIPs in the game, just like airlines/hotel chains run VIP programs. Riff raff in cattle class please (myself included). CN knows who they are, and they themselves know. They have been here for years. We need to protect them for the bigger cause, to allow them to help clean up this corrupt mess for our kids :).



sorry but a little naive. There are those posting here who have other objectives, ie to have this conversation broken up (I wonder why), and some that are simply stupid and/or need an off line social life :)


Tinman said:
sorry for 3rd post in a row. Wanted to clarify the intent.

Suggestion is to only have a small part of the forum, a few threads, with VIP "post" and general public "read" access. If non-VIPs want to comment they can do so in general threads. VIP's can pick up comments from general threads and re-post these in theirs, or indeed post in general threads.

In the off line world you can also not partake in many VIP conversations... And by the way, I hate the selectivity of a "VIP" concept, but it's not the point.

And I would suggest we get over the "general everyone's forum" idealism. Most forums don't work because of the huge amount of **** on them. The clinic I suspect has been a fairly select hang out until recently, but it's now likely to be targeted (another conspiracy theory right!), certainly having an increase in readership/active posts (I suspect).

So do something rapidly or lose it. Suggestions welcomed, opinion only much less worthwhile...



Tinman said:
voted maybe/other. There may be other (perhaps additional) options to reduce clutter and make for easier reading.

The question is how do you reduce noise and increase quality of postings. To better group posts by threads is only partly addressing this, but with the volume of topic developments and overlaps as well as an increase in posters it's going to be hard to execute.

And therefore I do remain of the opinion that it's at the poster level there needs to be better controls, not only postings. Providing a thread (or more) for the guys who we all know shape opinion here and have inside links/info, are connected, etc is one option. Better moderation another, but again hard to do.

Maybe can look also at how other forums resolve this issue; can't be unique to CN, must be some best practice out there, if not, maybe an opportunity to experiment here at the clinic.
 
Mar 19, 2009
1,796
0
0
well that is way beyond my power, you would have to contact people who actually work for cycling news, maybe send daniel benson a pm(he is here sometimes) or try to contact him on twitter, i think he said that was the best way of contacting him...

well it is an interesting idea but not really one i would support as you said a vip only section is not my bag. but i will suggest it to them though
 
Aug 9, 2010
6,255
2
17,485
palmerq said:
me.. it was brought it to my attention that ll had been up to no good so i investigated it and after some pms and information gathering i concluded this fellow was up to no good, so i have banned them for good.

anyway get back on topic :S whatever that is

Thanx P!
:)
 
May 14, 2010
5,303
4
0
palmerq said:
yes thats true, i will try to do better in the future

No need to apologize. You can't be everywhere all the time. If no one comes to you with something specific and substantive, I don't see how you can be expected to know about it, unless you just happen to come across it at random. For someone who (very generously) volunteers his time and energy for everyone's benefit, you do a fine job, IMO.
 
May 20, 2010
718
1
0
Laura Lyn ban

Call me "lacking insight"

Please forgive.

While I found some posts confusing/confused I could not see what was wrong. Esp when compared to Polish (baiting) and some of the abuse/condescension of others.

If anyone has time/inclination (Big Ben/Tower of Pisa), please PM me a brief explanation.

ta js
 
Aug 27, 2012
1,436
0
0
JA.Tri said:
If anyone has time/inclination (Big Ben/Tower of Pisa), please PM me a brief explanation.

me likewise. A PM would be appreciated with rationale for the lifetime ban, and whether this was preceeded with warnings, or whether there was evidence of malicious intent (ie. outside agency postings).

We can all learn from this one.
 
elementary dear.....................

Maxiton said:
Obvious Polish is obvious. :D

ha ha! i never expected this 'niche' corner of the forum to explode into life in such a manner

we all do love a good conspiracy theory......................why? let reality get in the way of a good story

so i'm polish...............except...................my ideas are 100% anti polish
such as 'from the quiver of awesomeness 7 glorious wins 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
...............all gone!'.................a parody

yes! i am aware when polish's ban ends...........info is on the forum

just wait ..........if he is back............i will be first in line to give him grief
 
Aug 27, 2012
1,436
0
0
My last post on the lady in question you all love to hate.

If indeed this is who she is, I certainly believe so. And yes I do think she is misinterpreted by many folk here. If you do some homework on google you will see her posting on many cycling websites (eg Gerard Vroomen), keen to dig into Livestrong funding discrepancies, and certainly no longer a supporter of LA.


Please explain her lifetime ban, PM is fine. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater is never good.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.