• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Soudal - Quick Step Thread

Page 44 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
No, that's not the only reason.

Ineos' budget is big but not unlimited and average budget teams' budgets are lower, but they're not 0. Ineos can't outbid other teams on every rider even if they would hypothetically have unlimited leadership opportunities.

Let's say Ineos have €20m for rider salaries and QS have €8m. Ineos take one big star for €5m, another for €4m and another for €3m. So for their remainding 27 riders they have €8m to spend and QS also have €8m to spend. It means for QS would be able to match or even outbid Ineos for say 1 out of 4 big name riders. Those numbers are made up but you get what's the logic here. After a big budget team commits some of their budget to some of the riders they don't have enough left to outbid other teams on every other rider.
I do think Ineos have paid some huge contracts for pure climbing domestiques. Wasn't Diego Rosa on 1.5M/year?
 
Think you'll find that Jayco's budget is now around 14 million with Alula coming on as a major sponsor - They'll have more money to spend on riders in 2024/2025, however it's important they nail their recruitment of mid-level riders which is sadly lacking in the current team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
No, that's not the only reason.

Ineos' budget is big but not unlimited and average budget teams' budgets are lower, but they're not 0. Ineos can't outbid other teams on every rider even if they would hypothetically have unlimited leadership opportunities.

Let's say Ineos have €20m for rider salaries and QS have €8m. Ineos take one big star for €5m, another for €4m and another for €3m. So for their remainding 27 riders they have €8m to spend and QS also have €8m to spend. It means for QS would be able to match or even outbid Ineos for say 1 out of 4 big name riders. Those numbers are made up but you get what's the logic here. After a big budget team commits some of their budget to some of the riders they don't have enough left to outbid other teams on every other rider.
I explained exactly that reason you are now trying to explain me...

But don't forget that you can't attract 1 top rider if you don't have a good support cast. Just look at guys like Arnaud De Lie, who could have had a very good chance winning 2 races (Omloop and first stage in PN) if he had a better team. Part of the attraction of QS, at least in the classics, was that you were guaranteed to have team mates in the finale, so you didn't have the burden and stress of being the only team leader, and you saw them winning with more than one rider, so you could expect that your winning chances were bigger. Part of the reason why small teams are not attractive for a good classics rider is that are quickly on your own. So you would be willing to ride for QS for e.g. 80% of the wage you could get in another team, but with more chances to win races, and with the opportunity to cash in later in a smaller team when you feel you don't improve anymore.
 
Aren't you always talking about Almeida? He didn't do much outside those years...
You couldn't possibly have understood me better! The noob is gradually hit harder and harder by the realization that "what if the effect of the pandemic on WT might not be known until a couple of years ahead?". "What if the cyclists and teams a noob liked just got lucky in the pandemic lottery?". Then started the noob cycling fan existential crisis.
 
Steimle and van Tricht still need a few percents to regularly ride in their 1a team. Van Lerberghe gets praised a lot. All in all, their team for the Flandrien classics is worse than Evenepoel and his Ardennes men.

Who‘d expected this few years ago?…
Unfair comparison because the Ardennes team has Evenepoel.

It may be a bit weird it's almost like Ardennes like races are a bit of a dead specialisation. There's Alaphilippe and who else?
 
At least the lunch was good, but not a good day otherwise:

Soudal-QuickStep team boss Patrick Lefevere wrote in his Saturday morning Het Nieuwsblad column that his meal on Friday afternoon was the only good part of his day.

"During the E3 Saxo Classic, I had a tasty lunch in Waregem. With that, I had everything that was good yesterday – the food," Lefevere wrote. "The team's performance was below par. I understand not being with the three in the front, they are phenomena. But no-one being in the group behind them either? Sorry, but that's not Soudal-QuickStep.

"On the bus, I gave my thoughts, as always, without shouting. Then I heard from Kasper Asgreen – I did my best, from Florian Sénéchal – I fell, from Julian Alaphilippe – I woke up with a stomach ache and slight fever. What do you want me to say to that? If you have a fever, you shouldn't start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dobrien
No, that's not the only reason.

Ineos' budget is big but not unlimited and average budget teams' budgets are lower, but they're not 0. Ineos can't outbid other teams on every rider even if they would hypothetically have unlimited leadership opportunities.

Let's say Ineos have €20m for rider salaries and QS have €8m. Ineos take one big star for €5m, another for €4m and another for €3m. So for their remainding 27 riders they have €8m to spend and QS also have €8m to spend. It means for QS would be able to match or even outbid Ineos for say 1 out of 4 big name riders. Those numbers are made up but you get what's the logic here. After a big budget team commits some of their budget to some of the riders they don't have enough left to outbid other teams on every other rider.

But there are more teams than just Ineos. And if you are outbid by 5 teams for 3 riders each, you'll only get the 16th best available...

Which is exactly why Quickstep has to rely on their scouting to work flawless. For years they had a pipeline of young classics riders on the cheap. Pozzato, Boonen, Stybar, Trentin, Lampaert, Asgreen, etc. all joined on cheap contracts. When did they actually outbid anyone for a star rider from another team? There was hardly any money left after trying to retain their own talents. And some of them they had to let go because of it. Like Pozzato, Kwiatkowski, Trentin, Schachmann, ... imagine they could've kept them all together.

Problem is, in recent years this pipeline of talent has dried up. Bagioli did not become the next Alaphilippe. Vernon did not become the next Cavendish. Senechal did not become the next Terpstra...
 
Problem is, in recent years this pipeline of talent has dried up. Bagioli did not become the next Alaphilippe. Vernon did not become the next Cavendish. Senechal did not become the next Terpstra...
And with an increasing number of the big talents on or having come through the U23 teams of other WT teams (while QS' own feeder team is pretty weak) and half the peloton copying what QS did with Evenepoel and snapping up the biggest talents at 18 or 19, it's hard to see the pipeline returning to its past state. The reality is that QS haven't really innovated their approach for a while, which has allowed other teams to catch up with and pass them. They should consider themselves fortunate to have Evenepoel papering over just about as many of the cracks as a single rider possibly can - and they might not have had him had he been from any other country than Belgium - because the rest of their lineup is increasingly average. Or perhaps worse, in the case of their cobbles squad.
 
Last edited:
Bad timing, too, that their two most prominent non-Remco riders are struggling at the same time.

Alaf I think is maybe just a bit over the hill. Physically he looks good but clearly isn't the rider he was just 18 months ago. Could also be that his crash has left some lasting effects, but he's also a rider who has done a lot of all-out efforts in his career, and may have already peaked.

But Asgreen is a mystery to me.
 
Bad timing, too, that their two most prominent non-Remco riders are struggling at the same time.

Alaf I think is maybe just a bit over the hill. Physically he looks good but clearly isn't the rider he was just 18 months ago. Could also be that his crash has left some lasting effects, but he's also a rider who has done a lot of all-out efforts in his career, and may have already peaked.

But Asgreen is a mystery to me.
Seems these all out attacking riders really crack sensationally. Straight up non competitive one season to the next
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
The problem is not just lacking the talent. Alaphilippe might have been the strongest in the 2020 TDF. Asgreen won the 2021 TDF. They are being left in the dust left and right by pelotons of 30 or 40 riders.
This. The QS team that absolutely dominated the 2021 E3 is more or less the same team that GOT dominated in the same race in 2023. Their opponents are also the same (Pogačar is the only one extra). The loss of performance of especially Asgreen and Alaphilippe is remarkable. Guys like Lampaert, Ballerini, Jakobsen and Senechal are slightly worse than they used to be (some more than others), but I find Van Lerberghe and Merlier better than expected. And yeah, I am well aware of the changes in the team personel that can´t be discussed here, but I wonder why certain QS riders can maintain themselves beter than others.
Underperforming riders are of course a way to get rid of some big salaries, money that can be used to spend on Remco´s train. But PatLef can´t be thàt cynical? Or can he?
 
Last edited:
This. The QS team that absolutely dominated the 2021 E3 is more or less the same team that GOT dominated in the same race in 2023. Their opponents are also the same (Pogačar is the only one extra). The loss of performance of especially Asgreen and Alaphilippe is remarkable. Guys like Lampaert, Ballerini, Jakobsen and Senechal are slightly worse than they used to be (some more than others), but I find Van Lerberghe and Merlier better than expected. And yeah, I am well aware of the changes in the team personel that can´t be discussed here, but I wonder why certain QS riders can maintain themselves beter than others.
You saw Jörgensen & Garcia at E3. There's your answer. Asgreen always was just a solid rider. Nothing more. Senechal is a mediocre rider that suddenly won bunch sprints. Look at Bennett & Viviani. Cavendish is riding on crutches like he used to prior to re-joining Quick Step. Gaviria suddenly rides well again. Except for his unprofessionalism to be unmotivated once it heavily rains.

Jakobsen on the other hand has been harmed in development, because of his major crash and the injuries. He just can't confirm that super talent status into becoming a rocket sprinter. But he's still very good.
 
pan-y-agua-27910005.jpg
 

TRENDING THREADS