The liege front group today struck me as 3 obvious dopers and 2 guys who I'm not sure if I trust or not. Am I naïve for thinking Gaudu might be clean? Certainly we know the level of the top riders has been ridiculous the last 2 years.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Yes.Am I naïve for thinking Gaudu might be clean?
Possibly? The Gianetti Prodigy I certainly find suspect.The liege front group today struck me as 3 obvious dopers and 2 guys who I'm not sure if I trust or not. Am I naïve for thinking Gaudu might be clean? Certainly we know the level of the top riders has been ridiculous the last 2 years.
The liege front group today struck me as 3 obvious dopers and 2 guys who I'm not sure if I trust or not. Am I naïve for thinking Gaudu might be clean? Certainly we know the level of the top riders has been ridiculous the last 2 years.
What narrative are you referring to?Valverde was busted for Puerto.
obvious dopers the others?
and the poor Gaudu from a MPCC team holding to these "obvious?" dopers
the narrative of cycling fans is sometimes out of this world
What narrative are you referring to?
At this point I'm 100% convinced the peloton is where it was during Lance's era and that everyone in it like then is on something. We're right back in the 2000's again just with something different. There is no one that is clean in the peloton.
At this point I'm 100% convinced the peloton is where it was during Lance's era and that everyone in it like then is on something. We're right back in the 2000's again just with something different. There is no one that is clean in the peloton.
When was it any different?
Riders never stopped doping. Anytime. They always have doped. What I think is happening is that there is free reign due to the pandemic. And some riders, or many riders, just go overboard or abuse the drugs. In the 90's we know there was free reign. I don't know about the 2000's because authorities were closing in on the tests. We know now that there was free reign for the Texan since he had the UCI in his pocket. So for me the difference is whether you have free reign or not. It usually happens where there is no testing or there is a new drug. For me is the lack of testing. I don't care if people trying to convince me otherwise. I just look around the world and I say there is no way that in these times there is normal testing. No way. Not close. I don't think there is a new drug. In 2007/2008 there was almost a free reign period until the French federation screwed it all up.
Last thing to say, riders respond different to doping. In this case it has benefitted the best responders obviously. There are some theories about how to check for the best responders but I am not an expert and I am not going to go there.
The worst nightmare of every cycling fan, being considered naïveThe liege front group today struck me as 3 obvious dopers and 2 guys who I'm not sure if I trust or not. Am I naïve for thinking Gaudu might be clean? Certainly we know the level of the top riders has been ridiculous the last 2 years.
Riders never stopped doping. Anytime. They always have doped. What I think is happening is that there is free reign due to the pandemic. And some riders, or many riders, just go overboard or abuse the drugs. In the 90's we know there was free reign. I don't know about the 2000's because authorities were closing in on the tests. We know now that there was free reign for the Texan since he had the UCI in his pocket. So for me the difference is whether you have free reign or not. It usually happens when there is no testing or there is a new drug. For me is the lack of testing. I don't care if people trying to convince me otherwise. I just look around the world and I say there is no way that in these times there is normal testing. No way. Not close. I don't think there is a new drug. In 2007/2008 there was almost a free reign period until the French federation screwed it all up.
Last thing to say, riders respond different to doping. In this case it has benefitted the best responders obviously. There are some theories about how to check for the best responders but I am not an expert and I am not going to go there.
Sky looked lost until the Giro and rebounded in a big way.
You did not finish Rackham. So what do you think happened at the end of the Tour? if everyone was doping anyway.
UAE paying someone? (analogy with Armstrong?)
I go to my same theory. Lack of testing and riders responding different to doping.
This is a massive misconception imo, Bernal and Sivakov were flying just after lockdown, the reasons for their struggles at the Tour were injuries. If Sivakov hadn't crashed and Bernal not damaged his back then Ineos would have been right up there in the podium fight.
I could write an entire thesis on the subject (& my post would be ridiculously long), but yeah, I believe something messed-up happened between the Col de la Loze on the Wednesday (with the Roglic non-motor drama) & the Saturday with Pogacar's stratospheric performance out of nowhere in the TT.
I don't even think this stuff is ever hidden particularly well either. Pogacar was very understated with his reactions after his win last year (just my opinion he didn't really display genuine happiness at all, i.e. a fact many noted but brushed off as a form of winner's "shock") & in the world championship one week later did everything for Roglic to win.
Again, I only see what's in front of me. My guess is there's a underlying acceptance in the peloton that "everyone dopes in the World Tour", but every year we get these really wild rides by certain riders & teams who get a pass for xyz reasons. I know Jumbo-Visma's tactics really, really irked a load of people in the Tour last year (the mood then was they were killing the spectacle), ergo the Time Trial reversal of fortunes came at an "opportune moment" for the drama & entertainment value.
Bernal on the second Friday of the Tour 2020 on stage 13 claimed he had the best numbers of his career & the pretty much insinuated the Slovenians were therefor suspect for beating him (that's what the press & commentators relayed). Then on the Sunday at the Grand Colombier, Bernal totally exploded when Jumbo set their tempo (i.e. a stage which Pogacar won from under Roglic's nose). He then abandoned on the following Wednesday.
What should we believe? i.e. if you say it's Bernal's injury which cost him in the Tour, then he was clearly lying after stage 13 (his numbers couldn't be his best if he was indeed injured). These guys can't have it all ways. Again, I only see , read & hear what's on display.
Bernal on the second Friday of the Tour 2020 on stage 13 claimed he had the best numbers of his career & the pretty much insinuated the Slovenians were therefor suspect for beating him (that's what the press & commentators relayed). Then on the Sunday at the Grand Colombier, Bernal totally exploded when Jumbo set their tempo (i.e. a stage which Pogacar won from under Roglic's nose). He then abandoned on the following Wednesday.
What should we believe? i.e. if you say it's Bernal's injury which cost him in the Tour, then he was clearly lying after stage 13 (his numbers couldn't be his best if he was indeed injured). These guys can't have it all ways. Again, I only see , read & hear what's on display.
Granted, they did have some moments in 2020, especially right after the restart, but to my eye they were not quite up to the level where they had previously been in the Dauphine and Tour. Whether they fell off a touch, or others improved is a fair question. I lean towards the latter being more determinative to the outcomes, but there are many factors involved in those early races. And obviously, they did catch on pretty quickly.This is a massive misconception imo, Bernal and Sivakov were flying just after lockdown, the reasons for their struggles at the Tour were injuries. If Sivakov hadn't crashed and Bernal not damaged his back then Ineos would have been right up there in the podium fight.
That is a bit too simple. There's about 500 riders in the WT. Many more professionals. We see plenty of riders never getting their second contract after being neo-pros; surely, not every single one of them started doping before turning pro. Even in the EPO era, it seems very plausible that Bassons was clean. And that's with a drug that was easy to get, very efficacious, and without a test for.There is no one that is clean in the peloton.
That is a bit too simple. There's about 500 riders in the WT. Many more professionals. We see plenty of riders never getting their second contract after being neo-pros; surely, not every single one of them started doping before turning pro. Even in the EPO era, it seems very plausible that Bassons was clean. And that's with a drug that was easy to get, very efficacious, and without a test for.
Of the WT riders, I would guess that it's more in the 75 % - 95 % range of them that has broken the WADA code within the last 12 months. But it's not easy to have a very informed opinion about that. Maybe it is more than that. Given the accounts of busted riders over the years, it seems to me that a significant part of the dopers only start doping after turning pro (probably not the most reliable part of their confessions), but I'll give that maybe it's more common now to step up as junior.