State of the Peloton 2025

Page 25 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
You're confusing Mayo with Mauro Gianetti. Understandable but from my understanding they are two very different people.

Looking at present day Mayo, you could possibly be excused for being confused.

oar2.jpg
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Didinho and E_F_
Pogacar's 2023-2024 improvement is nothing compared to the improvement Froomie made in about a week in 2011.
What Froome very much demonstrated was that if you come up with a somewhat plausible explanation, even if it's pretty darn unlikely, people will suspend belief and buy into it.

We keep on seeing these pretty weak explanations that supposedly support such total transformations. Bilharzia! A change in trainers!
 
This really belongs here
Wiggins/Froome/Sky era is not even close to what we are seeing. Sky's level is way overestimated IMO. Of course conditions and race day tactics matter but I always look at Alpe D'Huez climbing times as a general guide to compare eras:
  • When Sky launched Geraint Thomas to win on the Alpe in 2018 it took 41 minutes to climb that mountain.
  • In 2022 Thomas finished with Pogacar and Vingegaard in 39 minutes.
  • After 2024 PdB who would bet against Pog and Vingo demolishing Marco's record of 36'40"?
I mean, when you look at this all in hindsight, and toss any motor related strangeness, in general the Sky years were basically what you look like with massive TUE abuse and potentially a bit of extra dabbling. It is what closer racing looks like across the board. Times are tight and you can only get a bit above to get ahead.

Froome's monthfirmation transformation is another thing, but whatever; even at his best he would get dusted completely now.
 
The pundits of the French speaking Belgian television (former pro Cyril Saugrain being among them) are beginning to seems quite fed up with Politt. "Politt managing the gap and the GC group again" "He's a big guy Politt," "Yeah, about two Lenny Martinez, i don't understand" "Some riders crack and others seems to never crack" "This is vintage Hincapie".
 
  • Like
Reactions: b0ydman and E_F_
In today's stage thread someone posted a a table charting overall avg speed of 45+kmh for this year. Which is some 2-3kmh faster than any other edition.

Was the table real or for the lulz? I know it's been fast but that would be quite a bump.
 
May 18, 2012
13
21
8,560
We have no evidence of dirty stuff, other than bald timing facts and wattages and comparisons to the times of known juicers. But we have no proof

So at this moment in time all these pages in the clinic are just subjective finger pointing.

But you know what, in the last 40 years pretty well EVERY time we saw something that was unreal, we found out later that no, it wasn't real.

All those pages in the clinic (or equivalent of the day) were also just subjective finger pointing, but they were right and the truth was essentially in there.

I have no doubt we are witnessing the same, once again, and that we eventually will be proven right, once again. The urge to win is no less today than it was in the past

While we may be wrong in specific observations and speculations: batteries, engines, CO, TUEs etc, the fact always was that yes Dorothy, they were doping.

One would have to be incredibly naïve to believe that this is all bread and water, and the balance of probabilities is that too many riders ARE doping.

The 3 key questions are

1) Are they the winning riders, and
2) What is the process/ technology they are currently using? (is it new/ advanced, biological or motorised)
3) How much is the pro cycling system protecting it this time around?

Pro cycling is hard to watch. Even when I can celebrate a lesser team stage win I am sad because I'm still skeptical.

Too old and cynical - seen this all before, too many times
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeachBum and E_F_
Nairoman just can't catch a break


The Arkéa-Samsic/Nairo Quintana affair? “An old story,” said, until recently, a figure in the peloton. Many players in French cycling thought that this investigation, opened after a search during the 2020 Tour de France, had yielded nothing. On the contrary. According to our information, Nairo Quintana's doctor, Fredy Alexander Gonzales Torres, will be tried on September 2, 2024, in Marseille.
Above quote from "State of the Peloton 2024"
https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/fo...-of-doping-substances-in-2020-tour-de-france/
Colombian doctor Fredy Alexander Gonzales Torres has received a six-month suspended prison sentence and a €15,000 fine for possession and administration of doping substances during the 2020 Tour de France.

Gonzales Torres was not present in the Marseille court for the verdict, remaining in Colombia for the month-long trial. His lawyer has already confirmed he will appeal the sentence.

The Colombian acted as doctor for Nairo Quintana and his brother Dayer during the 2020 Tour France, as well as being a stand-in for the Arkéa-Samsic squad in the race after their usual doctor had fallen ill with COVID-19. ...Gonzales Torres was accused of possessing an intravenous drip during that year's Tour, discovered by police when they searched his room at one of the hotels used by the team on the COVID-delayed race that year.
So was this old fashioned IV recovery, which fell foul of the "no needles" ruling which nearly got Wiggins? Strange that no doping substances were found (or something on WADA's list?) only "vitamins" according to Nairoman, which sounds like IV recovery.
(UCI's no needles ruling news at
https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/uci-approves-no-needle-policy/)
 
Some interesting tit-bits from Tudor's Storer -
https://cyclinguptodate.com/cycling...ogacar-and-uaes-tactics-at-the-tour-de-france
Modern breakaways, Storer said, are nothing like what they used to be. “The 10-minute breakaways are finished. It’s all about forcing the breakaway now. The peloton doesn’t let you go, they have to be broken. That makes the racing extremely hard.”
Whilst this is true for days when a break might make it to the finish, if it's going to be a bunch sprint, then no one goes now (or only a couple of guys who get like 3 minutes max)
One topic Storer found particularly ridiculous? Watches in racing. “I’m totally fine with not wearing a Richard Mille on the cobbles. Cyclists are so focused on aerodynamics, then wear watches with drag. It makes no sense.”
He also dismissed overhyped recovery hacks. “There’s no magic cherry juice potion that’s going to fix your recovery. Maybe it’s 0.1% of your recovery. If I was an amateur, I wouldn’t be buying cherry juice.”
Yeah, get the latest aero socks then strap on a sponsors clunky watch, and of course the overhyped cherry juice in a box drink, which was a great marketing ploy by whoever thought it up.